Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: President Obama Weekly Address: Fighting for Trade Deals that Put American Workers First [View all]pampango
(24,692 posts)38. Your faith in congress to make this a better agreement, if given the chance, is intriguing.
You don't throw up your hands and say 'we can either just vote blindly for something negotiated by the Executive Branch or do nothing.
Iow, do it the Democratic way. Let Congress add amendments, take out stuff that is harmful to the American people etc.
IS there a reason why letting Congress represent those who hired them, has become so controversial?
Iow, do it the Democratic way. Let Congress add amendments, take out stuff that is harmful to the American people etc.
IS there a reason why letting Congress represent those who hired them, has become so controversial?
I would not go so far as to say "just vote blindly for something negotiated by the Executive Branch or do nothing" are good ideas. If every single word of the TPP is not released before any vote, it should be defeated. If it is all released, then we would not be 'voting blindly for something negotiated by the Executive Branch'. It may still deserve to be defeated if it is not a high-standards, high-enforcement agreement.
I would go so far as to say that I trust Obama to negotiate a good agreement more than I trust Boehner and McConnell to "change things that are good for Corporations" or "add amendments, take out stuff that is harmful to the American people" and make any Obama-negotiated agreement better for the American people.
I agree that to "do nothing" is a dismal alternative.
IS there a reason why letting Congress represent those who hired them, has become so controversial?
I suspect that, for many liberals, trusting the Boehner-McConnell congress to solve our problems is a rather rare occurrence. The majority of our base seems to want to keep the republican congress as far from influencing the content of this agreement as possible and sees TPA as a way to do this. And the prospect of those two republicans having the power to add and delete anything they want in the TPP is a scarier thought yet. It is unusual to see your level of bipartisanship here on DU.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
President Obama Weekly Address: Fighting for Trade Deals that Put American Workers First [View all]
lovemydog
Apr 2015
OP
First of all, the trade deal HAS been negotiated in secret. But our Reps on the Trade Commission
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#17
Plus infinity! Level playing field implies we all have the same standard of living...
cascadiance
Apr 2015
#28
Yes, now that we know about this horror that is part of this Trade Agreement and since
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#56
Thank you, and yes, a minimum wage IS important. However, much as I agree with that, the TPP
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#54
This bill is not like the old trade bills - from what we have seen so far it is about profits for
jwirr
Apr 2015
#43
Can you tell us what is in this Trade Deal that will help the Middle Class? Other than
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#25
I'm not sure what you are asking 'without the trade deal'. Do you want us to assume
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#53
Don't understand all you are saying but it seems to me that this would be a way of keeping the
jwirr
Apr 2015
#46
Totally agree, the argument that wage increases hurts overall profit if crap and needs
Rex
Apr 2015
#22
Mr. President, stop renegotiating NAFTA (and the FTA's with Australia, Chile, Peru and Singapore).
pampango
Apr 2015
#24
If it enforces higher labor and environmental standards on trading partners then it should address
pampango
Apr 2015
#29
Your faith in congress to make this a better agreement, if given the chance, is intriguing.
pampango
Apr 2015
#38
What do you think of Obama's 'level of bi-partisanship'? Thanks for the slam, this is what has made
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#40
"Most Republicans support Obama on this, while most Democrats do not." Not true.
pampango
Apr 2015
#44
Where are you getting that 'democrats support fast track'? Unions oppose it, even
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#49
"Only Democrats that identify as “liberal” strongly favor the idea. ... Republican majority oppose .
pampango
Apr 2015
#58
Kudos to your continued focus on discussing policies not posters. Many have missed
pampango
Apr 2015
#30
Great Revealer of True Motives and Beliefs strikes another blow for truth, justice and
pampango
Apr 2015
#45