Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Charles Pierce Asks: "How does one reason in the face of brutalized futility?" [View all]stone space
(6,498 posts)5. Nonviolence does not require giving ones opponent a veto over your actions.
It also requires reson among the people backing the other side.
No method of struggle works well when you hand your opponent a veto over your own protests that he can exercise simply by being unreasonable.
Nonviolence allows for reason on the part of your opponent, by removing factors of fear that short circuits reason, but does not compel it.
But in the end, nonviolence is about the exercise of power. It's a form of coercion.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Charles Pierce Asks: "How does one reason in the face of brutalized futility?" [View all]
kpete
Apr 2015
OP
No, it doesn't. Non-violent resistence requires reason on the part of nonviolent activists.
stone space
Apr 2015
#1
It's only coercive when violence is unacceptable to the people you are trying to overcome.
jeff47
Apr 2015
#10
Nope, we are not doomed. We just have to realize that a single tool can not fix all problems.
jeff47
Apr 2015
#16
Who should I threaten with what specific violent action, and how will it help?
stone space
Apr 2015
#26
what you absolutely fail to understand and acknowledge is that your lifestyle depends upon violence
TheSarcastinator
Apr 2015
#29
I'm not pushing guns at all. I mentioned several roles in the struggle that . . .
brush
Apr 2015
#45
Actually, non-violent protest only works under critical assumptions of the aggressor.
DetlefK
Apr 2015
#8
I dispute that a non-violent struggle works better than a violent struggle. Very different.
DetlefK
Apr 2015
#42
I fear we have come to a "Y" in the road...some hard choices are going to have to be made.
libdem4life
Apr 2015
#2