General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I am, not surprised; but, somewhat dismayed with ... [View all]rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)"If you understood the issue". and this "But you so clearly, painfully do not understand the economic issues associated with trade." Can't you present your case w/o deriding me?
No one has brought out any arguments that favor the TPP, yet you deride me for not understanding. You fail to address the concerns that trade is a small fraction of this "agreement".
"Can you explain why Warren said she is glad HRC is running for President, and she thinks HRC is terrific if HRC is such an fan of oligarchy? Does that make sense to you? " I wouldn't expect Sen Warren to say anything else until she decides to run herself. She is a good Democrat and will support HRC. That certainly doesn't mean she supports Clinton's views on letting Wall Street run amok.
Clinton in 2002 demonstrated that she will support the Republicons in a time of crisis.
Clinton and her husband have amassed an amazing amount of wealth, one hundred million dollars, in the last 15 years putting them in the highest of the 1%'ers.
Clinton has very close ties with Goldman-Sachs and told them she thought banksters were being picked on.
Clinton is expected to raise close to two billion dollars to assure she gets elected. This money comes from the 1%. They view it as an investment.
Clinton has the interest of the neocons because of her hawkish foreign policy.
Sen Sanders is a man of the people.