Wells Fargo fires employee for 1972 shoplifting conviction! The banksters can kiss my ass!

[slackmaster]

84. If the "progressive" ideology means letting unrepentant thieves and liars work for banks,

I'll have nothing to do with it. BTW, I don't know where you got the idea that I call myself progressive. I never have. I consider myself a moderate, a centrist. I think for myself, adopt the ideas of others when they make sense, and reject those that don't make sense.

There is a growing conflict in America between the 1% filthy rich and the rest of us and you're posts clearly indicate you're on the wrong side in this conflict.

Isn't the real conflict between those who take things that they don't deserve, vs. those who don't?

For the first time ever on DU I have must place a poster on total ignore for taking the side of big business and Wall Street against working people.

Big business and Wall Street didn't write the law. Congress did at a time when our nation was in the worst financial crisis in history, and I expect banks to abide by it. If the story had been about Wells Fargo covering for her and NOT firing her (or any other employee at any level who was found out to have done something similar,) I'd be very pissed at Wells Fargo.

I don't want to read any more of your lame posts in defense of Wall Street and corporate American tycoons when they attack ordinary working people as in this case.

Wall Street tycoons didn't do anything to Yolanda Quesada other than what the LAW required, and I haven't said a single word in their defense. She did it to herself by making two very bad decisions - One 40 years ago, the other five years ago. Is she someone who can be counted on not to lie or steal again in the future when it happens to be convenient or doesn't seem like a big deal to her?

Connect the dots!