Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Ruth Bader Ginsburg eviscerates same-sex marriage opponents in court [View all]blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)11. ,
,
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Just a bit of literary licence. The right likes to constantly dwell on her age. They lust for her
Monk06
Apr 2015
#23
I have no problem with the license or the taking of it. Just adding info for those who may have
merrily
Apr 2015
#27
Freepers use that incident, if you can call it that, to advocate for Ginsburg's retirement and
Monk06
Apr 2015
#48
The RW hopes they get their way with the next SC pick especially with a RW congress and what they
Monk06
Apr 2015
#62
Be thankful Cruz has his eyes on the GOP nomination. He would is more than qualified professionally
Monk06
Apr 2015
#64
I remember that one. Freepers accepted that slander as eye witness testimony. Endlessly repeated.
Monk06
Apr 2015
#69
The text and picture look likethey came from this article at The Guardian (link within)
Cerridwen
Apr 2015
#8
Scalia is smart. Deceptive, but smart. For a justice, he tries too hard to draw attention
merrily
Apr 2015
#52
yes, then she made a peace sign with her fingers, kissed it, held it up and said "Peace Out."
GreatGazoo
Apr 2015
#21
Tell me about it. Breyer and Kagan joined the (R) clowns on the Medicaid part of the ACA decision.
merrily
Apr 2015
#30
No question. Runs circles around the rest of the court. And Clarence Thomas? Not even
LuckyLib
Apr 2015
#50
Because, under traditional analysism, the state only has to have a rational basis
Ms. Toad
Apr 2015
#36
Our entire research budget should go toward preserving her health and quality of life
Orrex
Apr 2015
#12
The other side has that lying waste of skin, Scalia, yet he and Ginsburg love each other's company.
merrily
Apr 2015
#22
people with like magintudes of intelligence almost always enjoy each other's mind.
Cryptoad
Apr 2015
#24
Oh jeez, I have no idea how I badded that bad! I've edited my post. Thanks, spooky3. nt
ChisolmTrailDem
Apr 2015
#40