Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Rush Limbaugh says Clinton Foundation spends just 15 percent on charity, 85 percent on overhead [View all]
Some 'populists' at DU have been posting/recommending this Limbaugh accusation as if it were true, so here's the reality (spoiler alert: Limbaugh and the Clinton Haters are full of it)
http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/apr/29/rush-limbaugh/rush-limbaugh-says-clinton-foundation-spends-just-/
When most people in the charitable world think of foundations, they think of organizations that give away a lot of money in the form of grants to others who go out and do good works. The Clinton foundation works differently -- it keeps its money in house and hires staff to carry out its own humanitarian programs.
...
Our ruling
Limbaugh said "85 percent of every dollar donated to the Clinton Foundation ended up either with the Clintons or with their staff to pay for travel, salaries, and benefits. Fifteen cents of every dollar actually went to some charitable beneficiary."
Theres a grain of truth here -- roughly 85 percent of the foundations spending was for items other than charitable grants to other organizations, and a large chunk of this 85 percent did go to Clinton Foundation staff for travel, salaries and benefits. However, the foundation says it does most of its charitable work in-house, and its not credible to think that the foundation spent zero dollars beyond grants on any charitable work, which is what it would take for Limbaugh to be correct.
The claim contains some element of truth but ignores critical facts that would give a different impression, so we rate it Mostly False.
...
Our ruling
Limbaugh said "85 percent of every dollar donated to the Clinton Foundation ended up either with the Clintons or with their staff to pay for travel, salaries, and benefits. Fifteen cents of every dollar actually went to some charitable beneficiary."
Theres a grain of truth here -- roughly 85 percent of the foundations spending was for items other than charitable grants to other organizations, and a large chunk of this 85 percent did go to Clinton Foundation staff for travel, salaries and benefits. However, the foundation says it does most of its charitable work in-house, and its not credible to think that the foundation spent zero dollars beyond grants on any charitable work, which is what it would take for Limbaugh to be correct.
The claim contains some element of truth but ignores critical facts that would give a different impression, so we rate it Mostly False.
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rush Limbaugh says Clinton Foundation spends just 15 percent on charity, 85 percent on overhead [View all]
geek tragedy
Apr 2015
OP
Oh we know their point, all too well. Weird how rush limbaugh garbage makes it way
NoJusticeNoPeace
Apr 2015
#29
not really, because the argument was that all the money they spent internally
geek tragedy
Apr 2015
#17
Yes, without which expenses the foundation would fail to achieve its aims.
closeupready
Apr 2015
#25
There is an easy way to put a stop to this. Go to one of those charity rating sights and release the
jwirr
Apr 2015
#6
No, there is no easy way to stop Limbaugh and his fellow Clinton haters from spreading horseshit
geek tragedy
Apr 2015
#11
Here it is. According to their 2013 form 990, 80% of their spending was on program services.
lumberjack_jeff
Apr 2015
#16
This, coming from a mook who'd have no problem with that same balance if it were a rethug fascist
Populist_Prole
Apr 2015
#8
Additionally, if RL said this, he's nuts or lying, because he's reversed the numbers.
closeupready
Apr 2015
#18
More to the point, an organization which spent 85% on grants and 15% on overhead...
lumberjack_jeff
Apr 2015
#13
if you think the Clintons are idiotic, simple-minded fraudsters willing to spend time in federal
geek tragedy
Apr 2015
#32
So if someone says it's inconceivable that Hillary had Vince Foster killed, you'd consider
geek tragedy
Apr 2015
#38
the FACTS of the charitable activities and spending of the Clinton foundations are
geek tragedy
Apr 2015
#44
If Oxycontin Boy's lips are moving, then he's blowing it out of his ass as usual.
hobbit709
Apr 2015
#50
No, Limbaugh picked up a story from one rightwing website, made the claims,
geek tragedy
Apr 2015
#62