Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
12. So you *are* judging President Obama's trade deal with those of past presidents.
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 12:41 PM
Apr 2015

How prejudiced of you. And not very open-minded. And I blame "the public" for not trusting this president when they've known him for nearly SEVEN YEARS and that he's always, always worked on behalf of the middle class and the American worker.

Why the undeserved disrespect and distrust now?

Anyway...

President Obama has campaigned on renegotiating NAFTA's horrible enforcement provisions, and he's doing just that in the TPP. This Admin's goal is clearly detailed at the U.S.T.R.'s site.

Members of Congress - including Senators Warren and Sanders - have access to the drafts so far negotiated but what can change and are not yet set in stone. All changes, too, will be accessible to Senators. Anyone saying that's untrue is a liar and lying to pry open the wallets of their constituents.

By the way? President Obama is STILL IN THE MIDDLE OF NEGOTIATIONS. Nothing is set in stone, however, the latest TPA (aka fast track) compromise by Congress gives Congress and the American people a full six months - as opposed to 90 days in prior TPA pacts - to consider an agreement. That change alone should be touted as proof that a Black man has to work TWICE as hard for half the credit (or, in President Obama's case, NO credit).

Then, for the first 60 days after an accord is reached and even before the president can sign it, the trade agreement will have no action from Congress but will be fully open to public comments. Then you and other anti-trade Americans have more than enough time to demonize pick-a-part review the negotiated deal in public, via C-Span, via MSNBC, via CNN, via Fox "News" Channel, via all broadcast media giants and affiliates, via all print media, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera... Following that, Congress would have another 120 days to take an up-or-down vote.

Congress, for the first time, is also imposing a human rights negotiating objective, and 60 senators can end this authority at any time should they deem that the final deal did not meet objectives set out by Congress.

In summation...if the American people loathe NAFTA and CAFTA so much and want to change it, and if they distrust China more than they do President Obama, they would do well to support, not demonize or attack, the Trans-Pacific Partnership now in the able hands of this president.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

You mean Unions. And Unions should support the TPP if only to protect those union workers BlueCaliDem Apr 2015 #1
Well, if TPP is so much better than older agreements then WHY IS IT SECRET DAMMIT?!! cascadiance Apr 2015 #2
Why are all other international negotiations secret? pampango Apr 2015 #6
Can you tell me *which* international trade agreements had been broadcast via C-Span before Obama's BlueCaliDem Apr 2015 #7
And which international trade agreements haven't screwed the American public... cascadiance Apr 2015 #10
So you *are* judging President Obama's trade deal with those of past presidents. BlueCaliDem Apr 2015 #12
History shows that BOTH Democrat and Republican presidents have signed CRAPPY trade deals... cascadiance Apr 2015 #14
In short, your answer is "Yes". Clearly. Then there's nothing more to say to you. BlueCaliDem Apr 2015 #15
Thank you for your valualbe input on this thread, Blue Cali. I believe the President and not those Cha Apr 2015 #16
You're so welcome, Cha, and thank you for your support. Finding support for President Obama is hard BlueCaliDem Apr 2015 #17
Now Obama is doing this.. "Obama to announce eBook initiative for low-income students" Cha Apr 2015 #18
that's a very good article cali Apr 2015 #3
Excellent summary of the reasons why people are so suspicions. hifiguy Apr 2015 #4
K/R moondust Apr 2015 #5
Capitalism loves the wealth and hates the laborer, it really is that simple. Rex Apr 2015 #8
AFL-CIO has sued other countries IIRC 70 times now under NAFTA/CAFTA Recursion Apr 2015 #9
Interesting information, Recursion. Thanks for posting it. n/t pampango Apr 2015 #11
Neither CAFTA nor NAFTA have any "teeth" to go after violators. That's why we NEED the TPP. BlueCaliDem Apr 2015 #13
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Here's Why Democrats Don'...»Reply #12