This message was self-deleted by its author

[merrily]

22. As I posted to you at the time, I had laughed when I heard a gal reality show "star" say it.

Sorry you didn't get over my finding funny something that you did not find funny. And how ago was that? (And I'm supposedly playing victim?)

I'm not going to entertain you.

Yet, you keep replying, though it's true that your name calling replies are boring, rather than entertaining.

You were annoyed by my ebola posts. You jumped into my Eric Garner post for no good reason. You are the biggest (edited) here.

Annoyance? No, disagreement. I have no memory of your ebola or Garner posts. However, if anyone posts something with which I disagree, I just might state my disagreement, as might others who disagree. The response is to prove me wrong, not to start flinging ad homs. No one is shy about disagreeing with me and I don't take substantive disagreement personally. Most often, I welcome it.

You've been carrying this grudge about a substantive disagreement on a message board since the ebola outbreaks? Wow. Yet, I am a victim if I reply to your personal insults in the next post? Double standards isn't the term for it.

I've yet to see anyone support you in your agenda.

I have no agenda. However, posters have expressed agreement with a number of my posts, sometimes, strong agreement, thanked me, etc. Sorry you missed them. And, others have done the same in pms.

Most people ignore you. And from now on I will too.

Be my guest. I love it when someone who calls me names because we disagree puts me on ignore instead.