Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
2. Translated... Does this mean that she is AGAINST Fast Track Authority being passed now?
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 02:47 PM
Apr 2015

... since this ISDS provision would likely be in the TPP bill subsequently brought in under Fast Track rules, without congress having the ability to amend it to have it taken out, and if she is principled in her statements here, she'd then say they would have to vote no on the subsequent TPP bill because this ISDS piece would be in it without any ability at that point to have it removed.

I wish she'd be more clear that this statement means that she is AGAINST Fast Track and urges all Democrats to vote against it if they favor what her administration would like to have put in place if she's elected president.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hillary Clinton Agrees Wi...»Reply #2