Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Baltimore riots: 'They even took the ATM' – Pakistani shop owner may have lost $100,000 to looters [View all]romanic
(2,841 posts)12. Look up the business relationship
between Arab/Chaldean owned businesses located in mostly-black neighborhoods.
Maybe the owners weren't specifically targeted for being Pakistani; they could've been targeted for not being black in a black area.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
238 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Baltimore riots: 'They even took the ATM' – Pakistani shop owner may have lost $100,000 to looters [View all]
ForgoTheConsequence
Apr 2015
OP
I remember the korean guys shooting back but I don't remember them being targeted.
Hassin Bin Sober
Apr 2015
#10
Do you have any evidence that the store owner in the OP mistreated anyone?
NaturalHigh
May 2015
#203
I tend to agree it wasn't because of ethnicity. Shops and cars were damaged as a group effort
still_one
May 2015
#204
I don't think 1SBM thinks "people are making it up"; 1SBM is questioning an old facile narrative
Recursion
May 2015
#222
they were targeted because they weren't black, because they were Chinese and Arab
geek tragedy
May 2015
#47
NONE here expressing sudden "concern"about ATM's or CVS's actually give a shit
NoJusticeNoPeace
May 2015
#78
Unfortunately I don't see this getting a lot of attention or concern here
riderinthestorm
Apr 2015
#13
where have you been, young lady? i had some spare time this weekend, and made something for you...
dionysus
May 2015
#227
the looters successfully purged the neighborhood of the plague of small businesses.
geek tragedy
May 2015
#23
The "long term repercussions" are still rooted in police treatment of black folks
Blue_Tires
May 2015
#77
You can mourn for the uninsured property loss; I'll mourn for the tragically needless dead...
Blue_Tires
May 2015
#84
And some of us can fucking evaluate which one takes precedent over the other...
Blue_Tires
May 2015
#87
I'm bi-racial. That said, there's plenty of folks of all color concerned here
riderinthestorm
May 2015
#89
CVS can afford to write off a rebuilt (and possibly reburned) store for PR purposes nt
geek tragedy
May 2015
#43
As I said, as PR expense. Generate some nice warm fuzzy stories about not giving up on
geek tragedy
May 2015
#55
Bitter laugh. Watts, Detroit, Newark and other riot torn neighborhoods prove otherwise
riderinthestorm
May 2015
#52
Because if you own a business in a high crime area insurance is prohibitively expensive./NT
DemocratSinceBirth
May 2015
#37
most of these policies have force majeure clauses - so would not cover these circumstances
DrDan
May 2015
#38
If the ATM fees were double what they are everywhere else, then you could say they were
okaawhatever
May 2015
#63
Because that totally justifies destroying a family's sole source of income nt
geek tragedy
May 2015
#45
200 media filming & watching looters break in and steal from the charles street businesses, &
Sunlei
May 2015
#49
Because "it's only property". Meanwhile she lives in a gated community. Just sayin'.
WillowTree
May 2015
#58
Remember conservatives harping about Al Gore's "I created the internet" guote?
NobodyHere
May 2015
#73
A good friend from high school lives in a "gentrified" part of the city
JustAnotherGen
May 2015
#106
I saw Wilkerson give a talk about the re-migration (at Howard, oddly enough)
Recursion
May 2015
#231
No. You clearly haven't read the article. The $$ loss and the ATM are unrelated
riderinthestorm
May 2015
#161
That is where a black person is ahead of a white person in line at the movie theater
NoJusticeNoPeace
May 2015
#174
A riot falls under force majeure. I'm sure they aren't covered in that case
riderinthestorm
May 2015
#122
So 10 years on DU talking about my small biz are all a front for this moment?
riderinthestorm
May 2015
#141
Does he want a steel/black/blue GMT, the new one? Ask him, he will know what I mean
NoJusticeNoPeace
May 2015
#176
It is ABSURD to compare the MINIMAL property damage done when you realize
NoJusticeNoPeace
May 2015
#152
They do have their lives, the boy with the snapped neck dosent have his life!
lewebley3
May 2015
#170
i am saying, these criminals finally got up to what middle white crime steal, and get away with.
seabeyond
May 2015
#160
why do you do that? why do some argue in that manner? it isnt factual, it isnt a productive
seabeyond
May 2015
#164