Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Baltimore riots: 'They even took the ATM' – Pakistani shop owner may have lost $100,000 to looters [View all]NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)34. No that's the expected amount of merchandise lost.
The ATM and its contents are likely property of the sponsoring bank.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
238 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Baltimore riots: 'They even took the ATM' – Pakistani shop owner may have lost $100,000 to looters [View all]
ForgoTheConsequence
Apr 2015
OP
I remember the korean guys shooting back but I don't remember them being targeted.
Hassin Bin Sober
Apr 2015
#10
Do you have any evidence that the store owner in the OP mistreated anyone?
NaturalHigh
May 2015
#203
I tend to agree it wasn't because of ethnicity. Shops and cars were damaged as a group effort
still_one
May 2015
#204
I don't think 1SBM thinks "people are making it up"; 1SBM is questioning an old facile narrative
Recursion
May 2015
#222
they were targeted because they weren't black, because they were Chinese and Arab
geek tragedy
May 2015
#47
NONE here expressing sudden "concern"about ATM's or CVS's actually give a shit
NoJusticeNoPeace
May 2015
#78
Unfortunately I don't see this getting a lot of attention or concern here
riderinthestorm
Apr 2015
#13
where have you been, young lady? i had some spare time this weekend, and made something for you...
dionysus
May 2015
#227
the looters successfully purged the neighborhood of the plague of small businesses.
geek tragedy
May 2015
#23
The "long term repercussions" are still rooted in police treatment of black folks
Blue_Tires
May 2015
#77
You can mourn for the uninsured property loss; I'll mourn for the tragically needless dead...
Blue_Tires
May 2015
#84
And some of us can fucking evaluate which one takes precedent over the other...
Blue_Tires
May 2015
#87
I'm bi-racial. That said, there's plenty of folks of all color concerned here
riderinthestorm
May 2015
#89
CVS can afford to write off a rebuilt (and possibly reburned) store for PR purposes nt
geek tragedy
May 2015
#43
As I said, as PR expense. Generate some nice warm fuzzy stories about not giving up on
geek tragedy
May 2015
#55
Bitter laugh. Watts, Detroit, Newark and other riot torn neighborhoods prove otherwise
riderinthestorm
May 2015
#52
Because if you own a business in a high crime area insurance is prohibitively expensive./NT
DemocratSinceBirth
May 2015
#37
most of these policies have force majeure clauses - so would not cover these circumstances
DrDan
May 2015
#38
If the ATM fees were double what they are everywhere else, then you could say they were
okaawhatever
May 2015
#63
Because that totally justifies destroying a family's sole source of income nt
geek tragedy
May 2015
#45
200 media filming & watching looters break in and steal from the charles street businesses, &
Sunlei
May 2015
#49
Because "it's only property". Meanwhile she lives in a gated community. Just sayin'.
WillowTree
May 2015
#58
Remember conservatives harping about Al Gore's "I created the internet" guote?
NobodyHere
May 2015
#73
A good friend from high school lives in a "gentrified" part of the city
JustAnotherGen
May 2015
#106
I saw Wilkerson give a talk about the re-migration (at Howard, oddly enough)
Recursion
May 2015
#231
No. You clearly haven't read the article. The $$ loss and the ATM are unrelated
riderinthestorm
May 2015
#161
That is where a black person is ahead of a white person in line at the movie theater
NoJusticeNoPeace
May 2015
#174
A riot falls under force majeure. I'm sure they aren't covered in that case
riderinthestorm
May 2015
#122
So 10 years on DU talking about my small biz are all a front for this moment?
riderinthestorm
May 2015
#141
Does he want a steel/black/blue GMT, the new one? Ask him, he will know what I mean
NoJusticeNoPeace
May 2015
#176
It is ABSURD to compare the MINIMAL property damage done when you realize
NoJusticeNoPeace
May 2015
#152
They do have their lives, the boy with the snapped neck dosent have his life!
lewebley3
May 2015
#170
i am saying, these criminals finally got up to what middle white crime steal, and get away with.
seabeyond
May 2015
#160
why do you do that? why do some argue in that manner? it isnt factual, it isnt a productive
seabeyond
May 2015
#164