Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

calimary

(90,618 posts)
16. And he's a fucking IDIOT. Of the first order. Any Chief Justice of the SCOTUS should know the
Fri May 1, 2015, 04:31 PM
May 2015

Presidential Oath of Office backwards and forwards - drunk, stoned, and half asleep. THAT is one of the special jobs of the Chief Justice. Swearing in the new President, or the newly-reelected President. The Chief Justice does that. Furthermore, as such, the Chief Justice has at least a couple of months - from Election Night on the First Tuesday in November til Inauguration Day on January 20th - early November through mid/semi-late January - to practice, to rehearse, to prepare. It's 35 words. A single long run-on sentence. ONE SENTENCE. And Chief Justice john IDIOT botched the oath. The first Presidential swearing-in - for the first-in-American-history African American President of the United States. HISTORIC. JUST MONDO MEGA HISTORIC.

As a retired news person I just about had a seizure. "YOU FUCKED UP THE SOUND BITE, YOU IDIOT!!!!!!!!!" I just screamed when I witnessed that. Notice, mind you, that whenever you see that video clip from THAT DAY, THAT HOUR, THAT INAUGURAL CEREMONY, THAT TAKING-of-the-OATH, there will be NOT ONE soundbite or video clip that will show or play the entire oath. That landmark never-to-be-had-again moment in this nation's history can never be fully savored again. That fucker ruined the damn soundbite.

You watch. WHENEVER there's a retrospective on the Presidency, or on Barack Obama's presidency, his eventual obit, ANYTHING on that order, you watch. They will have to bail out on that HISTORIC "I, Barack Hussein Obama, do solemnly swear..." BOOM. OUT. That's all they've got. For all time. That's all they can use - now and forever more, amen. That fucking idiot roberts ruined the historical record in a single instant. And it's not as though he was caught off-guard or had to rush over at the last minute or didn't understand his damn job or didn't have a chance to prepare or that it had some been kept secret from him until just moments before he had to administer the oath. He had almost THREE MONTHS to prepare, to rehearse, to memorize that very brief Presidential Oath, or at least write it down on a damn cue-card. He knew about THIS HISTORIC Inaugural - and about HIS own role in that historic moment, from the moment Barack Obama was pronounced the winner of the election on Election Night.

It pisses me off so much that I will be relentlessly reminding people of his idiocy as long as I draw breath. I will NEVER let this one go. OR let it be forgotten. john roberts is a FUCKING IDIOT. If he can't get 35 words right, with almost three months to prepare, I don't care what else he may do for the rest of his life. He's a FUCKING IDIOT. Then again, he was nominated by an idiot, so what else could we expect?

The oath of office of the President of the United States is an oath or affirmation required by the United States Constitution before the President begins the execution of the office. The wording is specified in Article Two, Section One, Clause Eight:

Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:— “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” (I counted 35 words - not including the "or affirm" part.)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oath_of_office_of_the_President_of_the_United_States

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

EXACTLY! elleng Apr 2015 #1
Staggeringly cynical and simultaneously naive to the point of stupidity. (nt) enough Apr 2015 #2
Who would have thunk it! marym625 Apr 2015 #3
well that's because he is gay wilt the stilt May 2015 #28
So quid pro quo KT2000 Apr 2015 #4
Pretty much. If your goal is to ruin the nation. Enthusiast May 2015 #15
Wow dhol82 Apr 2015 #5
K & R. Revealing Roberts..! appalachiablue Apr 2015 #6
Based On This Language That Applies To Judges Can The Citizens United Decision Be Reopened And.... global1 Apr 2015 #7
heard Nina Totenberg read that on NPR and fell down laughing. rurallib Apr 2015 #8
Roberts is still a corporate hack. GeorgeGist Apr 2015 #9
And he's a fucking IDIOT. Of the first order. Any Chief Justice of the SCOTUS should know the calimary May 2015 #16
Ah... here's the entire oath Scootaloo May 2015 #21
He got it wrong, they had to redo it. mountain grammy May 2015 #25
Roberts is trying to have it both ways Gothmog Apr 2015 #10
He's an idiot. See above. calimary May 2015 #17
Scalia was pretty pissed off in his dissent. Orrex Apr 2015 #11
And HE'S a JERK! calimary May 2015 #18
That's his blessing on Pay to Play government. nt valerief Apr 2015 #12
Banana republicans dreamnightwind May 2015 #13
Which means their expanding clown car is turning into a banana boat! calimary May 2015 #23
Do politicans take oaths to advance the causes of their financial backers? RiverNoord May 2015 #14
VOTE! raven mad May 2015 #19
It's the infection of MBA's in our politics Scootaloo May 2015 #20
He's completely wrong. Politicians shouldn't hughee99 May 2015 #22
He's just afraid the SCOTUS will be flooded by stupid rulings from judges who were "bought" McCamy Taylor May 2015 #24
Now, that little tale is about the best explanation of the influence of money mountain grammy May 2015 #27
Twisted logic. kentuck May 2015 #26
Citizens United essentially legalized bribery blackspade May 2015 #29
Everything that is wrong with Citizen's united=Pay to play is wrong. midnight May 2015 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chief Justice Roberts Acc...»Reply #16