Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: HRC was critical of TPP before it was cool [View all]Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)66. Nice to see you're finally (albeit implicitly) conceding the "gold standard" quotation.
You've refused to do even that much for several days, and just in this thread you strongly implied that anyone asserting that Clinton had called the TPP "the gold standard" was a tool of the right-wing media. So, congratulations, you're making (very slow) progress toward addressing the real world instead of a Clinton-can-do-no-wrong bubble.
Now, as to your quotation -- I can't imagine why you boldfaced the 40% passage. That's been undisputed from the beginning.
Then you write:
So are you saying that ALL trade agreements are automatically bad for the US? They are only good for the rest of the country, but bad for the United States? Do you advocate just making it illegal for US corps to sell or buy anything outside the United States?
My answers: No, no, and no, and I'll add that nothing I've written comes close to raising any serious suspicion that I might hold the extreme positions you ask me about. Putting question marks at the end of your unsubstantiated ravings makes them only marginally less ridiculous.
I've written about the TPP. We know more about TPP than about TTIP, but there are strong similarities and I will probably go along with most people in treating them the same. (Some people will support both and some will oppose both; few will be split.)
Have there been trade agreements that were good for the U.S.? Absolutely. The most obvious example is the reduction in tariffs that occurred after the Smoot-Hawley tariffs of 1930 were seen to have done great harm. Higher U.S. tariffs prompted retaliatory tariff increases by other countries. Putting an end to that trade war (through various bilateral and multilateral agreements) benefited everyone.
As numerous commentators have pointed out, though, tariffs are generally much lower today than they were before FDR took office. There's not all that much scope for promoting trade through tariff reduction. As a result, although the TPP has some provisions relating to tariffs, most of it is about non-tariff matters. Those are the provisions that have raised the most concern.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
153 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
No, some politicians and economists think it should be, but right now - not in it.
djean111
May 2015
#10
We CAN'T push for anything, that is the problem, far more of a problem than what is in it or not, is
sabrina 1
May 2015
#120
We all have jobs that are answerable upline.....unless we are the CEO/owner/President
Sheepshank
May 2015
#24
Hillary did the right thing with the Server, Obama's emails have been hacked into!
lewebley3
May 2015
#152
I remain unconvinced that you and thinking are on so much as nodding terms, Maggie
cali
May 2015
#88
Nice to see you're finally (albeit implicitly) conceding the "gold standard" quotation.
Jim Lane
May 2015
#66
Then she should have IMMEDIATELY said when entering the race that she is against Fast Track...
cascadiance
May 2015
#28
That is bullshit. She doesn't have to criticize the President. It's about policy not personalities
cali
May 2015
#42
No-o-o.... She could criticize the REPUBLICANS who support this piece of crap!
cascadiance
May 2015
#64
Yeah, who was the Secretary of State who was negotiating the TPP from 2009 to 2013?
jeff47
May 2015
#55
"evolving" the HRC campaign talking points "to the left" requires a lot of revisionism.
delrem
May 2015
#80
Notice that your defense of Hillary is completely inconsistent with the OP's defense of Hillary.
Jim Lane
May 2015
#118
Unlike her vote on the Iraq War Resolution, she has not said she made a mistake.
Jim Lane
May 2015
#136
Explanation: This is a mix of Clinton quotation and someone else's commentary
Jim Lane
May 2015
#147
By the way, I have been posting criticism of the TPP here since 2013, so "almost a year ago"
djean111
May 2015
#139
You need to send this to Sanders followers, the are telling lies about Hillary on TPP!!
lewebley3
May 2015
#151