Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

sulphurdunn

(6,891 posts)
47. She cynically voted to give that imbecile
Sat May 2, 2015, 04:23 PM
May 2015

George Bush a green light to invade Iraq. She did that when anybody who took the time to learn anything about what was happening knew it was a fraud. I will vote for no politician who supported that war.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Sirota just made the case for Sanders 2016, imo n/t fredamae May 2015 #1
+1000000000 woo me with science May 2015 #3
Agree peacebird May 2015 #7
the big money borg. Hillary has long been part of it. cali May 2015 #2
I'm ambivalent about Hillary, but conflating the Clinton Foundation with Hillary's checkbook is bull lumberjack_jeff May 2015 #4
Agree. GeorgeGist May 2015 #9
Absolutely. nt okaawhatever May 2015 #13
Two points... Had to jump in somewhere... DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #40
It aspires to be a foundation with global reach not unlike the Gates foundation. lumberjack_jeff May 2015 #42
I see quid...I don't see quo... DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #43
Except for that 9 out of 10 thingy....as in "not always" Caretha May 2015 #72
If there were a quo... DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #76
Why wouldn't we try to beat them at their own game? JaneyVee May 2015 #5
Agree GeorgeGist May 2015 #10
Because they're corrupt. Marr May 2015 #18
We can end Citizens United by beating them at their own game. JaneyVee May 2015 #20
That makes as much sense as digging your way Motown_Johnny May 2015 #21
You can dig your way out of a hole. Its called a tunnel. JaneyVee May 2015 #23
Kind of like having sex for chastity? 99Forever May 2015 #61
We may beat the Rs at their game but the big money guys are going to want something for their jwirr May 2015 #56
Ding ding! Winner winner chicken dinner! Populist_Prole May 2015 #60
So the correct decision is to unilaterally disarm? brooklynite May 2015 #6
Exactly. Nothing more than another Clinton hit piece. What an irresponsible article. nt okaawhatever May 2015 #14
Well, duh! One of the big reasons given as to why Hillary should be The One - BIG MONEY! djean111 May 2015 #8
+1 The problem presented as the excuse. woo me with science May 2015 #11
Well, I hope you make it an absolute condition of Sander's campaign that he not take money okaawhatever May 2015 #16
LOL! woo me with science May 2015 #17
Wow so the majority of Bernie's money comes from PACs and the majority of Clinton's money okaawhatever May 2015 #19
And who took more money from PAC's? LOL KittyWampus May 2015 #31
I guess you really CAN tell about people by the company they keep. n/t pa28 May 2015 #34
I am just saying that Hillary's big wad of money was given as an actual reason that she djean111 May 2015 #55
really? Florencenj2point0 May 2015 #52
Hillary is just playing by the rules. sulphurdunn May 2015 #12
No. You don't commit campaign suicide. You win and as soon as possible overturn those laws. CU will okaawhatever May 2015 #15
A progressive candidate sulphurdunn May 2015 #30
The problem is now presented as the excuse! woo me with science May 2015 #22
So, to be clear...even though the Republicans will raise $1 B + through Super PACS... brooklynite May 2015 #25
Yea, that's about right. sulphurdunn May 2015 #33
"Not to play" = give up brooklynite May 2015 #39
Sometimes it means "not a sucker" sulphurdunn May 2015 #46
explain then how you compete with the Republicans who WILL take every last SuperPAC dollar brooklynite May 2015 #48
You don't. That's the idea. sulphurdunn May 2015 #53
...and you believe you can win a national election on that basis? brooklynite May 2015 #54
I think you miss my point. sulphurdunn May 2015 #58
And in the meantime, I still think a Democrat is better...maybe you don't? brooklynite May 2015 #62
There is no meantime. sulphurdunn May 2015 #63
Good observation Populist_Prole May 2015 #26
^^^THIS^^^ L0oniX May 2015 #75
Unilateral disarmament does not lead to peace. geek tragedy May 2015 #24
Bad analogy. sulphurdunn May 2015 #37
Losing is not much of a strategy. nt geek tragedy May 2015 #65
Fighting for Tweedledum sulphurdunn May 2015 #66
The Democrats are not a rightist party. geek tragedy May 2015 #69
He made case for Hillary: If Hillary want to really win, She and Dem's have to win! lewebley3 May 2015 #27
Winning the battle but losing the war Populist_Prole May 2015 #28
Hillary was good for the 99% most successful Administration in History! lewebley3 May 2015 #32
To the GOP sulphurdunn May 2015 #38
If that is what you think Hillary: You have been lazy about learning about her! lewebley3 May 2015 #44
She cynically voted to give that imbecile sulphurdunn May 2015 #47
Again, the War was Bush's Decision alone: He said so!! lewebley3 May 2015 #77
Kosovo was a PNAC war nationalize the fed May 2015 #49
Dem's can only be good for 99% : if GOP win 99% will be fighting a war in Iran! lewebley3 May 2015 #45
You don't get it, and never will Populist_Prole May 2015 #59
Sirota is such a liar: "the party SEEMS to be collectively saying" KittyWampus May 2015 #29
Democrats have embraced a number of right wing concepts, Maedhros May 2015 #35
You left out the Heritage Foundation Health Insurance Mandate nationalize the fed May 2015 #50
David Sirota has been on a roll lately. pa28 May 2015 #36
If he's as successful at taking down Hillary as he was in taking down Rahm HRC will certainly be #45 DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #41
I'm Ready For Oligarchy - Are You? - Vote HRC - What Better Way To Enrich The 1% Even More cantbeserious May 2015 #51
this article is insane Florencenj2point0 May 2015 #57
What lies are there? uppityperson May 2015 #64
no! not the LEFT WING! and your sigline says Clinton's progressive--care to explain the difference? MisterP May 2015 #68
the reasoning is that if we don't support TPP we can't make it "more liberal" and if we're MisterP May 2015 #67
And which Democrats are those? ibegurpard May 2015 #70
Who writes this shit!? Caretha May 2015 #71
Sirota is as full of shit as a christmas turkey madokie May 2015 #73
Yer bad! Yer very very bad! L0oniX May 2015 #74
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»David Sirota: In Defense ...»Reply #47