General Discussion

marym625

(17,997 posts)

305. That's opinion

Sat May 2, 2015, 09:08 PM

May 2015

And it's not correct.

I am actually pretty shocked.

Please do some more research. I will link a couple. Things but I am not rehashing all the arguments from 2000. The fact is that the election was stolen.

There are two documentaries, one is free, and a book in these links. There are many more sources.

http://www.gregpalast.com/vultures-and-vote-rustlers-watch-the-trailer-get-the-film/

http://www.michaelparenti.org/stolenelections.html

http://www.diggers.org/freecitynews/_disc1/0000001e.htm

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2012/06/yes-bush-v-gore-did-steal-the-election.html

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/jun/06/uselections2000.usa

http://www.documentary24.com/presidential-election-2000-how-bush-stole-the-white-house--161/

http://www.gregpalast.com/ballotbandits/

I hope you read and watch. As I said, I am not going to rehash an almost 15 year old argument when the facts speak for themselves

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

487 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

All you fools supporting Sanders were probably supporting Nader in 2000 [View all] woolldog May 2015 OP

Oh, go fool yourself. djean111 May 2015 #1

Does a fool need to fool themselves? marym625 May 2015 #5

Only when the bear is Catholic and the Pope shits in the woods. smokey nj May 2015 #83

LMAO! marym625 May 2015 #89

First of all - NADER RAN AS A THIRD PARTY CANDIDATE. FourScore May 2015 #112

Yep. SusanCalvin May 2015 #211

You are correct in your first point but wrong in the second. former9thward May 2015 #235

Wow! That's some selective editing. Here's the entire explanation (Gore won!) FourScore May 2015 #247

Selective editing? former9thward May 2015 #270

Thank you for your factchecking. nt woolldog May 2015 #272

You need to fact check marym625 May 2015 #306

That's opinion marym625 May 2015 #305

Its not an opinion. former9thward May 2015 #392

wow! marym625 May 2015 #393

I have one question..., Exilednight May 2015 #436

I have no idea who Nader voters would have voted for if he was not on the ballot. former9thward May 2015 #439

LOL! YOU'RE calling The Guardian "agenda driven"? A simple search of your DU posts shows FourScore May 2015 #440

Having a journal is a DU requirement now? former9thward May 2015 #441

Since when is reporting the truth considered an "agenda"? cui bono May 2015 #473

So the NYT and Washington Post, etc. former9thward May 2015 #480

iirc, the NYT stated that Gore won after all the ballots had been counted. cui bono May 2015 #483

No they said the opposite. former9thward May 2015 #484

The NYT didn't count the ballots a consortium did. cui bono May 2015 #486

Nevetheless, you were quite wrong Stargleamer May 2015 #398

No, the New York Times said Bush had won. former9thward May 2015 #438

How's the pay in your line of work? n/t FourScore May 2015 #442

Good, how is yours? former9thward May 2015 #443

His quote was from a subsequent article in 2012.. . Stargleamer May 2015 #448

That changes nothing. Major Hogwash May 2015 #403

Why are you in this thread then? The OP is about the 2000 election. FourScore May 2015 #437

To point out how hopeless your argument is. Major Hogwash May 2015 #461

YEP! Rosa Luxemburg May 2015 #238

You are calling the wrong people fools marym625 May 2015 #2

sorry but someone needs to be the voice of reason. woolldog May 2015 #17

no, the reason the election was stolen marym625 May 2015 #25

I understand Sanders is only running for the primary. woolldog May 2015 #51

So, THAT'S why we "lost" in 2000? Really, now... MrMickeysMom May 2015 #59

I was very involved in 2000 and SCOTUS only had a chance to step in due to Nader's stupidity Gothmog May 2015 #206

In Florida in 2000, the average Black Man had 3/5's of a vote, ... stone space May 2015 #430

I'm more likely to put the blame there... MrMickeysMom May 2015 #467

jesus christ on a cheese sandwich! marym625 May 2015 #67

we didn't lose in 2000. nt barbtries May 2015 #76

yes, yes we did: woolldog May 2015 #90

disagree. barbtries May 2015 #97

The only reason the SC got to rule on it was because it was so close. woolldog May 2015 #115

RThe reason it appeared to be so close was because of all the stolen votes. Jackpine Radical May 2015 #163

and don't forget 100s of thousands of votes not counted marym625 May 2015 #173

Yeah. I omitted the "Felons List" too. Jackpine Radical May 2015 #189

Sabrina1 got them marym625 May 2015 #194

See, there is apparently some parallel universe fantasy land wherein Cal Carpenter May 2015 #279

Fantasy lands can be fun marym625 May 2015 #285

Well the OP is acting like a child davidpdx May 2015 #412

And if Gore had managed even to carry his home state . . . markpkessinger May 2015 #407

Al Gore lost because Nader's stupidity and making the election in Florida to be close enough Gothmog May 2015 #208

Bernie is running to win. And we intend to help him do that. Nader had ZERO to do with the sabrina 1 May 2015 #123

+1000 marym625 May 2015 #193

+1000 Pooka Fey May 2015 #423

Why can Sanders not win a general election? freedom fighter jh May 2015 #138

So we should just crown her queen. Ms. Toad May 2015 #142

I trust HRC is politically adroit enough to navigate through these waters. DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #151

Yes. That's the only sensible thing for Democrats to do. Have our differences in the Cal33 May 2015 #248

I am in L A... I expect she will do very well here... DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #250

The nomination is usally sewn up long before the CA primary. Would be really cool though KingCharlemagne May 2015 #324

"forcing Clinton to go on the record..." Buns_of_Fire May 2015 #203

That attitude of yours could very well also mean helping the GOP cheaters to win. They Cal33 May 2015 #253

Post removed Post removed May 2015 #327

+1000!!! AND isn't part of the purpose of the primary to DebJ May 2015 #394

"Forcing Clinton to go on the record on controversial issues" - aha. Warren DeMontague May 2015 #313

Amen, Warren! markpkessinger May 2015 #406

Excuse me, but how can Sanders force Clinton to do anything? stone space May 2015 #427

The reason so many votes could be manipulated... CherokeeDem May 2015 #165

no. wrong. But thanks for playing marym625 May 2015 #168

Were you in Florida during the 2000 election? CherokeeDem May 2015 #207

I didn't have to be in Florida to know what happened. marym625 May 2015 #214

I know exactly what happened.... CherokeeDem May 2015 #281

OMG You were there! I can't help thinking where we'd be today Pooka Fey May 2015 #287

It was the most unbelievable time of my life... CherokeeDem May 2015 #307

My experience of observing the 2007 presidential election in FR Pooka Fey May 2015 #414

Oh my lord! marym625 May 2015 #288

I never said they didn't steal the election.... CherokeeDem May 2015 #303

I believe everything you say marym625 May 2015 #311

Rubbish. More Dems voted for Bush than voted for Nader. So trying to pin 2000 on Nader rather KingCharlemagne May 2015 #330

Not Rubbish..... CherokeeDem May 2015 #341

+1000 Pooka Fey May 2015 #416

So, what did your local party do about all the Dem voters voting for Bush? n/t eridani May 2015 #345

Even dumb people are free to choose their candidate in a democracy, that's how it works Pooka Fey May 2015 #421

I'm saying why more angst over Dems who voted for Nader compared to-- eridani May 2015 #471

Seriously? CherokeeDem May 2015 #428

And the small number of Dems who voted for Nader-- eridani May 2015 #470

I would love to see the statistics CherokeeDem May 2015 #479

Nader only drew 24,000 Democrats to his cause, yet 308,000 Democrats voted for Bush eridani May 2015 #487

Actually, it was Pat Buchanan that siphoned a lot of the votes in Florida. Jamastiene May 2015 #48

Don't worry. He'll only hurt Hillary by telling the truth to power. L0oniX May 2015 #53

Sanders will not siphon votes away from HRC notadmblnd May 2015 #88

he will weaken our only viable candidate. woolldog May 2015 #96

Bullshit. One or the other will be the nominee notadmblnd May 2015 #98

Bernie may be able to move HRC some to the left, But I doubt it. LiberalArkie May 2015 #108

Exactly how is he going to weaken her? jwirr May 2015 #239

If a primary would weaken her, she's not viable. This isn't the Special Olympics. AtomicKitten May 2015 #309

BINGO!!!!! BEST rebuttal! n/t DebJ May 2015 #396

+1000 smirkymonkey May 2015 #434

If Hillary Clinton is our only viable candidate... Chan790 May 2015 #323

Our candidate should be representative of our ideals and have the balls DebJ May 2015 #395

How, exactly, will he weaken Hillary? markpkessinger May 2015 #405

You are forgetting something: There are Democrats (including here at DU) who openly state that Cal33 May 2015 #267

No, there's simply not enough of them notadmblnd May 2015 #269

You're right. The GOP has nobody of presidential caliber to offer. Those intending to Cal33 May 2015 #275

Ah, but you must remember, the SC decided that one. notadmblnd May 2015 #286

Yes, that's what I said. And the same Supreme Court is still around this time. Cal33 May 2015 #411

How many DUers won't vote for Clinton? Change has come May 2015 #389

One? The same DUer who stayed home to eat waffles, SMC22307 May 2015 #447

This message was self-deleted by its author notadmblnd May 2015 #95

Bernie is not running as an independent so he will not siphon votes. Voice for Peace May 2015 #110

While I agree with your assessment of Nader's influence on the election, Ms. Toad May 2015 #140

Hillary is out of touch with the base...and will also hurt the party. Chan790 May 2015 #322

What about the hundreds of thousands of Dems voting for Bush? eridani May 2015 #344

Well, you are certainly not that voice .Gore Won The Election. The SC stole it for Bush sabrina 1 May 2015 #383

It can't hurt the primary to have a real debate in the contest for the nomnation Ken Burch May 2015 #388

You're not being the voice of reason...you're being the sneer of snark Ken Burch May 2015 #469

... Cali_Democrat May 2015 #3

^^That^^ onecaliberal May 2015 #55

Yep, +1. nuff said chknltl May 2015 #260

Someone didn't get the updated talking points. smokey nj May 2015 #4

To be fair, though, Jackpine Radical May 2015 #192

....... smokey nj May 2015 #197

OP Fail. Agschmid May 2015 #6

oh dear gwheezie May 2015 #7

PUMA is back. tridim May 2015 #8

And it is just May 2, 2015 nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #69

...... cali May 2015 #93

Please delete your stupid and divisive post. n/t Comrade Grumpy May 2015 #9

This Agschmid May 2015 #26

What Grumpy said. kestrel91316 May 2015 #205

Nader ran in the democratic primary? sufrommich May 2015 #10

BTW...Bernie is running for the Democratic nomination... Cali_Democrat May 2015 #11

I really don't blame Nader for 2000. I think he became understandably bitter with age, struggle4progress May 2015 #12

Ironic rec - A post so bad it's actually great for laughs Cheese Sandwich May 2015 #13

Oh hell. Why not? -nt LiberalAndProud May 2015 #39

Its good in the way a really low budget B movie can be, The "plan 9" of posts Dragonfli May 2015 #243

Nader & Sanders are two very different situations. Not comparable at all. 99th_Monkey May 2015 #14

You left out the Dirty Hippie, Commie, and Red, parts of your post. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2015 #15

Is this satire or a genuinely held belief? (nt) muriel_volestrangler May 2015 #16

That's what I was wondering. SusanCalvin May 2015 #212

I was thinking it looked more like N Korea /nt Dragonfli May 2015 #245

You're right. SusanCalvin May 2015 #273

only a fool would make such a stupid assumption cali May 2015 #18

wait a minute, honeypie woolldog May 2015 #68

I doubt it. so what, sweetpea? cali May 2015 #82

because, honeybun, woolldog May 2015 #113

that's opinion, not fact, cupcake. cali May 2015 #120

she needs to be protected, woolldog May 2015 #155

I believe that a contested primary will strengthen her cali May 2015 #170

A bold viewpoint Babel_17 May 2015 #283

"she needs to be protected...because she's not a very good politician." Chan790 May 2015 #325

How does a poor politician negotiate with world leaders and with Congress? DebJ May 2015 #397

I'm getting hungry. B2G May 2015 #166

lol! Yeah. HappyMe May 2015 #191

How did you know lemon is my favorite?? B2G May 2015 #199

I believe Bernie will beat Hillary in the primary. I fail to see how that makes him a spoiler.... peacebird May 2015 #91

Because he has no chance in hell of winning a general election. woolldog May 2015 #100

Silly wabbit, wool over your eyes. I personally feel HRC has no chance in the general. peacebird May 2015 #109

+1000 n/t MissDeeds May 2015 #179

Harry Truman would feel closely aligned with Bernie Sander's ideology than Hillary and said this... cascadiance May 2015 #225

Please learn the proper use of "begs the question". Exilednight May 2015 #101

nothing wrong with the way I used the phrase. woolldog May 2015 #104

You're THAT kid. I get it now. Exilednight May 2015 #111

Oh god woolldog May 2015 #141

Then you should know how to properly use the Exilednight May 2015 #160

... woolldog May 2015 #184

You're funny. Making accusations when your OP is nothing Exilednight May 2015 #202

... woolldog May 2015 #217

IMHO before you decide to be a stickler for correct grammar in someone else's post, truebluegreen May 2015 #295

I'm not a stickler for that kind of nonsense. woolldog May 2015 #297

I stand corrected. truebluegreen May 2015 #300

When people start posting their test scores to bolster their argument, puppies weep. cyberswede May 2015 #230

When people start posting their test scores, I seriously wonder about their "credentials". Exilednight May 2015 #233

Yes, Bernie most definitely can beat Hillary in the Primary. Are you trying to turn people against sabrina 1 May 2015 #130

You don't seem to know what "spoiler" means. Marr May 2015 #216

He most certainly can be a spoiler woolldog May 2015 #220

Take it up with the english language. Marr May 2015 #222

Maybe you should? woolldog May 2015 #226

Good for you! Here's another word: Marr May 2015 #234

says the guy who doesn't understand that a spoiler is woolldog May 2015 #242

Keep digging. Marr May 2015 #246

Actually, I think he's doing a pretty good job of convincing me to support Bernie. DebJ May 2015 #399

! Adsos Letter May 2015 #262

Here's the specific, political, definition Babel_17 May 2015 #278

where did I say anything about a "spoiler effect"? woolldog May 2015 #338

This message was self-deleted by its author Babel_17 May 2015 #459

Horrors 1939 May 2015 #282

Damage, like a flower? Babel_17 May 2015 #457

Woolldog iz seriuz fillosffy mayjer! Woolldog knos lojik! muriel_volestrangler May 2015 #227

... woolldog May 2015 #229

Sanders is running as a Democrat, not an independent. NuclearDem May 2015 #19

EXACTLY! Poster should Delete...There's no comparison... KoKo May 2015 #137

I think you just crapped your pants. LuvLoogie May 2015 #20

Careful now LondonReign2 May 2015 #271

This is helpful sharp_stick May 2015 #21

Better to lose with Bernie then win with hillary . bowens43 May 2015 #22

No,it's not. sufrommich May 2015 #33

Agree. Agschmid May 2015 #148

President Cruz applauds you workinclasszero May 2015 #63

Why do you hate the poor? nt. Starry Messenger May 2015 #122

No, it's not. NuclearDem May 2015 #164

Oh. Here comes the "traitor " name calling mylye2222 May 2015 #23

That's a great OP headline. FarPoint May 2015 #24

Thank you. woolldog May 2015 #188

You alerted on a post that has already been alerted. DisgustipatedinCA May 2015 #27

I got the same thing. Agschmid May 2015 #152

And I HERVEPA May 2015 #376

Since a jury didn't hide it, I'll guess it goes in my ever-enlarging trashcan full of crazy. ScreamingMeemie May 2015 #28

Nah stay and watch the FAIL. Agschmid May 2015 #61

Lulz TransitJohn May 2015 #29

Please stop H2O Man May 2015 #30

You understand how primaries work, right? gollygee May 2015 #31

Let the primary wars begin. LiberalAndProud May 2015 #32

the effect will be the same however: woolldog May 2015 #85

Nonsense, woolldog. LiberalAndProud May 2015 #92

Hillary lost in 2008! And Obama is not Hillary! woolldog May 2015 #153

Seriously? LiberalAndProud May 2015 #159

oh bullshit. you realize that Martin O'Malley is almost certainly getting in and cali May 2015 #107

Funny. LiberalAndProud May 2015 #121

bullshit, bumkum, nonsense, codswallop, garbage- they all work fine. cali May 2015 #126

This. Chan790 May 2015 #329

Thats just not true. Agschmid May 2015 #339

Having more than one strong Dem candidate will also mean the Clowns on the other side DebJ May 2015 #400

Chill... If Bernie wants to run, let the guy do so. Xyzse May 2015 #34

LOL! HappyMe May 2015 #35

The ignorance is strong with this one. arcane1 May 2015 #36

Thank you DU jury members woolldog May 2015 #37

So not only do you not understand the political process, you don't understand the First cui bono May 2015 #64

I didn't say anything about the first amendment, now did I? woolldog May 2015 #128

I rest my case. cui bono May 2015 #347

you have no case... woolldog May 2015 #357

Court has already adjourned. cui bono May 2015 #358

This message was self-deleted by its author G_j May 2015 #280

You understand what a Primary is? Matariki May 2015 #38

The last thing we need right now is to go for each other's throats! world wide wally May 2015 #40

Gore won Florida... Nice glamour shot Hillary! flamebait... haikugal May 2015 #41

"Nice glamour shot Hillary!" sufrommich May 2015 #71

Do you disagree? It is a glamour shot and she looks good. haikugal May 2015 #240

What an arrogant and factually incorrect post. PeaceNikki May 2015 #42

Um, you do realize this is the primary, don't you? Zenlitened May 2015 #43

Appropriate given the OP: Cooley Hurd May 2015 #44

. LWolf May 2015 #58

All you people who keep voting for corporate candidates onecaliberal May 2015 #45

*** L0oniX May 2015 #46

Calling Sanders supporters 'fools' would equal projection in your case IDemo May 2015 #47

Im hoping for Bernie but if Hillary wins the Primary Drale May 2015 #49

I think Sanders is who we ALL have been waiting for... MrMickeysMom May 2015 #50

Nope. LWolf May 2015 #52

Bernie has a 100% rating from NARAL and the Human Rights Campaign. Zorra May 2015 #54

So you're saying you have zero knowledge of how politics works. cui bono May 2015 #56

Hillary will lock in the very evils of Bush Jr. Joe Turner May 2015 #57

OP FAIL. Agschmid May 2015 #60

'Tis better to be silent and be thought a fool stage left May 2015 #62

That's some weak gruel for trash talk. Come back when you get something more inflammatory KittyWampus May 2015 #65

This OP is embarrassing for you...and DU, frankly. cyberswede May 2015 #66

Actually I see a post that has united DU. I'm kind of sorry IT smokey nj May 2015 #79

LOl - good point! wooldog is a uniter, not a divider! cyberswede May 2015 #86

Did Nader run as a Democrat? AgingAmerican May 2015 #70

Excuse me? SheilaT May 2015 #72

Tell it to the 300,000+ registered Florida Democrats who voted for Bush. SMC22307 May 2015 #73

+300,000 PDittie May 2015 #144

all you fools. barbtries May 2015 #74

Also, Al Gore cost Al Gore the election in 2000 Zenlitened May 2015 #75

It always puzzles me when I see posts here like the OP deutsey May 2015 #146

To this add he didn't even win his home state of Tennessee. cloudbase May 2015 #149

Precisely. PDittie May 2015 #150

You are entitled to your opinion Sherman A1 May 2015 #77

Total logic fail. The two are unrelated If no Nader, Gore wins Florida and presidency. HERVEPA May 2015 #380

Thank You for Your Opinion Sherman A1 May 2015 #401

Actually, I stated facts, not opinions. HERVEPA May 2015 #413

...... daleanime May 2015 #78

Bwahahahaha!!!! Motown_Johnny May 2015 #80

Sir, Nader is no Senator Sanders. nt ladjf May 2015 #81

wtf? that so does nothing for the discussion. it is factually wrong, not logical nor does it make seabeyond May 2015 #84

Thank you JustAnotherGen May 2015 #236

What elected office did Nader hold then? JHB May 2015 #87

LaLaLaLa Binkie The Clown May 2015 #94

I can get over snark, but the dumb on this level is unforgivable. Read up on Election 2000 in FL. Pooka Fey May 2015 #99

"Hillary Clinton is the only Democrat that can win in 2016. We are better off rallying workinclasszero May 2015 #102

Not the same thing matt819 May 2015 #103

There's a big difference between a vote in a primary enough May 2015 #105

Fools? Maedhros May 2015 #106

Must obey corpomedia and their pollsters. moondust May 2015 #114

Hey your OP and the folks that rec it Puglover May 2015 #116

You do not appreciate the ironic rec? LiberalAndProud May 2015 #134

:) Puglover May 2015 #143

Hillary Clinton disagrees with you KMOD May 2015 #117

Sure, if by democracy you mean insisting disqualified votes be counted AtomicKitten May 2015 #127

So you agree with the OP, I guess. KMOD May 2015 #147

Bernie is running in the Democratic primary, not as a third party challenger like Nader. AtomicKitten May 2015 #156

Did you even read my post? KMOD May 2015 #161

You suggested I agree with the OP which is horseshit. AtomicKitten May 2015 #169

Are you just trying to argue? KMOD May 2015 #176

You paint her as a champion of democracy when as she demonstrated in 2008 AtomicKitten May 2015 #181

No. I said HRC stayed in the race because she believes in giving voters a choice. KMOD May 2015 #195

Okay. AtomicKitten May 2015 #402

Pfft. AtomicKitten May 2015 #118

.. Liberal_in_LA May 2015 #119

lol polichick May 2015 #124

This is silly, since the circumstances are totally different. Starry Messenger May 2015 #125

Was this really necessary? Feel better now? nt LiberalElite May 2015 #129

You're wrong, I voted for Gore. Why are you insulting people? CharlotteVale May 2015 #131

Welcome to DU, CharlotteVale!! Stargleamer May 2015 #454

Thank you! CharlotteVale May 2015 #462

And were 10-1 supporting Nader in 2000 Ms. Toad May 2015 #132

My wife and I decided that so far we're supporting Hillary. Dr Hobbitstein May 2015 #133

Name calling is juvenile cwydro May 2015 #135

Could your graphic image be any more creepy and Soviet? Throd May 2015 #136

I was thinking Orwell's 1984. Comrade Grumpy May 2015 #183

First thing I thought of Go Vols May 2015 #186

It certainly could not be more out of date - looks like it's from the 1990's. Divernan May 2015 #343

FFS... Agschmid May 2015 #346

I like it. woolldog May 2015 #374

Something that looks like it is straight from the DPRK art department is "retro-chic"? Throd May 2015 #453

I thought the same thing. n/t AngryOldDem May 2015 #460

Mein Fuehrer deutsey May 2015 #139

Obvious troll is obvious Kelvin Mace May 2015 #145

A terrible thread and some comments are even worse. PDittie May 2015 #154

I'll bite, what is your case? You have asserted that a primary will destroy Clinton's chances TheKentuckian May 2015 #157

see you around campus Skippy olddots May 2015 #158

Note - I'm not supporting Sanders at this time JustAnotherGen May 2015 #162

I am a Sanders supporter, but I probably won't talk about it. freshwest May 2015 #296

Get your joy back! JustAnotherGen May 2015 #408

OMG You're serious! hootinholler May 2015 #167

Uh, no wryter2000 May 2015 #171

You're the fool rjsquirrel May 2015 #172

Wow. Bernie Sanders really has some people coming completely unhinged Scootaloo May 2015 #174

to put it simply and politely, "Up yours" hobbit709 May 2015 #175

Reminds me of a Chairman Mao picture Go Vols May 2015 #177

That's just silly. MineralMan May 2015 #178

... rbnyc May 2015 #180

Not comprable LynnTTT May 2015 #182

Anyone who would vote for Sanders will LynnTTT May 2015 #185

straight to my ignore list. liberal_at_heart May 2015 #187

... Rex May 2015 #190

Here's why I support Bernie Sanders... Octafish May 2015 #196

And so the panic begins AgingAmerican May 2015 #198

+1, certainly seems that way. Marr May 2015 #223

.... SomethingFishy May 2015 #200

I don't think Sanders supporters are fools. I'd love to see his vision of a Scandinavian type Hoyt May 2015 #201

I am supporting Bernie in the Democratic primary. You can go pound sand. kestrel91316 May 2015 #204

Many fewer people will see your posts after this error on your part. roody May 2015 #209

This flame bait shit again? Pathetic. You are giving bush cover. morningfog May 2015 #210

Hillary's number one campaign liability: Hillary fans. /nt Marr May 2015 #213

Indeed. smokey nj May 2015 #291

^^^Truth. Chan790 May 2015 #336

You're right about Nader, but wrong about Sanders. DanTex May 2015 #215

Sanders is running as a DEMOCRAT! ananda May 2015 #218

Message auto-removed Name removed May 2015 #219

Stupid stupid post HERVEPA May 2015 #221

This post is a put-on. earthside May 2015 #224

You may be right... awoke_in_2003 May 2015 #268

lol fishwax May 2015 #228

Not me. And by the way. Nade lost in the primary but then ran in the general pulling votes away jwirr May 2015 #231

I think you're right. Sanders certainly wouldn't do it, and Hillary wouldn't either. She would Cal33 May 2015 #259

This message was self-deleted by its author G_j May 2015 #232

A fool is someone who can't count. Such as yourself. jeff47 May 2015 #237

None of that changes the fact that woolldog May 2015 #249

Yes, actually it does change it. jeff47 May 2015 #251

. Dragonfli May 2015 #241

Hey everybody! It is the VOICE OF REASON MuseRider May 2015 #244

These threads aren't helpful... DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #252

Sounds like a butthurt Hillary '08 supporter to me. shawn703 May 2015 #254

Primaries are EXACTLY the time to support the candidate that best suits your ideals. Mayberry Machiavelli May 2015 #255

For you it turned out okay obviously whistler162 May 2015 #256

Oh yeah? Oh yeah? Well, anyone who doesn't vote like *I* do is a big ol' poopiehead! Buns_of_Fire May 2015 #257

Well that's an oppinion you might share with maybe 63 DUers... chknltl May 2015 #258

Sorry, but that "Hillary 2016" picture looks like something from "1984." Oneironaut May 2015 #261

But her hair looks faaabulous... SMC22307 May 2015 #314

. PowerToThePeople May 2015 #263

I can virtually see the spittal flying LondonReign2 May 2015 #264

For the record tiredtoo May 2015 #265

That's why Bernie is running as a Democrat and not an Independent. Vinca May 2015 #266

Nope, I was too young to vote. Neoma May 2015 #274

Nope. n/t MadrasT May 2015 #276

I'm Ready For Oligarchy - Are You? - Vote HRC - Only Fools Vote Against Their Best Economic Interest cantbeserious May 2015 #277

Teh stoooopid must hurt. Sanders is running on the Dem ticket. nt valerief May 2015 #284

Pssst! Bernie and HRC are running in THE SAME PARTY! Nader was 3rd party spoiler. Lil Missy May 2015 #289

Oh god. bravenak May 2015 #290

I knew it was coming. We are 1 inch away from "narcissist trying to stay relevant!" nt Bonobo May 2015 #292

IF I wanted D's to vote Hillary in the General election should she win... Omaha Steve May 2015 #293

That's stupidest fucking thing I have read all year. 99Forever May 2015 #294

Nope get the red out May 2015 #298

nader did not run as a democrat DonCoquixote May 2015 #299

I gave bernie money and am actively working to see him elected. Hillary boooo boomer55 May 2015 #301

Sure he can't win but Hillary won't either so what doc03 May 2015 #302

SHE'S INEVITABLE I TELLS YA Warren DeMontague May 2015 #304

Pardon me, if i say yuiyoshida May 2015 #308

Squirm. cherokeeprogressive May 2015 #310

What a compelling message you have composed, here, to encourage support for Hillary Clinton! Warren DeMontague May 2015 #312

Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris and the US Supreme Court stole the election in 2000 Agnosticsherbet May 2015 #315

Well, perhaps only temporarily, but it would seem that the two camps are almost Buns_of_Fire May 2015 #316

Apparently a jury decided it's ok to call supporters of a Democratic candidate fools. rhett o rick May 2015 #317

This thread got a lot of responses. hrmjustin May 2015 #318

Apparently it's ok to bad mouth Sen Sander's supporters. Where are the hosts? rhett o rick May 2015 #348

It certainly has been reciprocated bby Sanders supporters. hrmjustin May 2015 #349

Is that what you want? Is that your justification? Do you think Sen Sanders rhett o rick May 2015 #350

No I know he doesn't. Agschmid May 2015 #351

This message was self-deleted by its author rhett o rick May 2015 #352

It's not a lost cause. Agschmid May 2015 #354

Ok thanks. I want to keep things civil. I hope Sen Sanders supporters don't behave like this. nm rhett o rick May 2015 #355

Some will, some won't. Agschmid May 2015 #359

I hear you but I don't want us getting into "handing butts back". We lose sight of the rhett o rick May 2015 #362

Without seeing the host conversation I can't judge what they did. Agschmid May 2015 #363

I try but as soon as I get in as host, I seem to get a lot of alerts on my posts. rhett o rick May 2015 #368

What are you talking about? hrmjustin May 2015 #353

Here is the deal, both "sides" dish it, both "sides" can take it. Agschmid May 2015 #360

Tell him that. hrmjustin May 2015 #366

This message was self-deleted by its author rhett o rick May 2015 #361

With due respect Rhett... hrmjustin May 2015 #364

This message was self-deleted by its author rhett o rick May 2015 #369

WHERE THE HELL DID I CALL SANDERS SUPPORTERS FOOLS ? hrmjustin May 2015 #371

I apologize. I thought for sure you were defending the OP. nm rhett o rick May 2015 #373

Goodbye Rhett! hrmjustin May 2015 #375

Don't think he did that? Agschmid May 2015 #372

How did you feel when anyone that dared say... one_voice May 2015 #463

Do you have a link? nm rhett o rick May 2015 #464

First, I shouldn't have accused you of double standards... one_voice May 2015 #465

I try to not have double standards but I am sure I slip. rhett o rick May 2015 #466

The sign of desperation Carolina May 2015 #319

Post removed Post removed May 2015 #320

To the jury: A-Schwarzenegger May 2015 #326

LMFAO. Thanks for that. I needed it! - nt KingCharlemagne May 2015 #328

Now watch, I'll get the hide. A-Schwarzenegger May 2015 #332

I have no interest in hiding anyone's posts. woolldog May 2015 #335

This message was self-deleted by its author rhett o rick May 2015 #365

Nah, I should take the hide. I knowingly and with malice aforethought crossed KingCharlemagne May 2015 #337

I didn't even know who the poor guy was except A-Schwarzenegger May 2015 #340

That's not true. Bernie Sanders is nothing like freaking nader. Please don't be rude like some of Cha May 2015 #321

I don't give .... sendero May 2015 #331

I was working for Al Gore quaker bill May 2015 #333

Gore won Florida Politicalboi May 2015 #334

Thanks for your concern. GoneOffShore May 2015 #342

Why oh why KMOD May 2015 #356

LOL, i'm drunk too!!! Nt Logical May 2015 #367

The OP is wrong on every point. Congratulations your post wins my load of lies award. Vincardog May 2015 #370

Here is exactly the way you portray yourself as a Hillary Clinton supporter...... davidpdx May 2015 #377

CURIOUS: Anybody else alert on this OP as Disruptive Meta (SOP)? A-Schwarzenegger May 2015 #378

Silly. Meta aimed at Sanders supporters and/or Hillary critics is not disruptive meta. merrily May 2015 #387

Things that make you go hmmm ... A-Schwarzenegger May 2015 #390

The alleged high road sure went downhill fast as soon as a populist challenger arrived. merrily May 2015 #379

Yep, low road Carolina May 2015 #419

I think Hillary supporters have a right to criticize Sanders. merrily May 2015 #420

moronic gibberish not even good enough for compost. 2banon May 2015 #381

This message was self-deleted by its author jeepers May 2015 #382

Please define "the extreme left" with some well-defined characteristics. How can I ID them? n/t xocet May 2015 #384

Congratulations! You win "Troll of the Day" John Poet May 2015 #385

I'd rethink your graphic there if I were you. Ken Burch May 2015 #386

Bernie will defeat Hillary because the voters will recognize authenticity. Enthusiast May 2015 #391

Bravo! Carolina May 2015 #417

Bogus comparison . . . markpkessinger May 2015 #404

the fool here is one who equates the general election with the primaries karynnj May 2015 #409

Wrong Robbins May 2015 #410

Horseshit krispos42 May 2015 #415

I didn't. AngryOldDem May 2015 #418

LOL, I hope you're not in charge of recruiting votes for HRC. City Lights May 2015 #422

A new "all you fools" meme for DU: IDemo May 2015 #424

See, there's this thing called sweeping generalization... sakabatou May 2015 #425

I haven't decided who to support in the primary, but you're dead wrong MH1 May 2015 #426

Not even comparable to Nader. Bernie is running as a Democrat, Nader did not, and Nader's still_one May 2015 #429

Okay Okay Okay Caretha May 2015 #431

UNREC brooklynite May 2015 #432

Thanks! Agschmid May 2015 #450

Dear Fool, lunatica May 2015 #433

Don't try to pull the wool over my eyes Autumn May 2015 #435

OMG, and this steaming pile of a post appears more than a year and a half before the election..... marmar May 2015 #444

that picture of her looks like Evita Person TheSarcastinator May 2015 #445

Yeah, it's so over the top I can't help but wonder deutsey May 2015 #449

Wow. That's one of the more pointlessly insulting attack-posts I've seen in a while. Orrex May 2015 #446

????? tazkcmo May 2015 #451

Haa!!! Good question !!!! orpupilofnature57 May 2015 #478

Sorry, for making you think outside your box, but no your orpupilofnature57 May 2015 #452

Jury RandiFan1290 May 2015 #475

I rest my case, and I apologize for my Rude remark, orpupilofnature57 May 2015 #476

Nervous huh? Joe Turner May 2015 #455

FOOL? LMAO Lunabell May 2015 #456

DEFCON 1 false equivalence. You watch too much Fox News WhaTHellsgoingonhere May 2015 #458

Dumb post. Blue_In_AK May 2015 #468

I agree with you on principle, but there's no need to call fellow DUers "foolish". Beacool May 2015 #472

Bernie already said he would support Hillary if he loses. Your post is meaningless. nt Quixote1818 May 2015 #474

Gore had more votes after a statewide recount. RedstDem May 2015 #477

I s'pose it's about that time when bumper-sticker wisdom and bubble-gum-wrapper philosophies LanternWaste May 2015 #481

Didn't Bernie support Gore in 2000? Hasn't he been a consistent Dem vote in the U.S. Senate WI_DEM May 2015 #482

Why is Hillary the only Democrat who can win in 2016? IVoteDFL May 2015 #485