Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Dear Bernie one way to make yourself insignificant is lumping in [View all]cyberswede
(26,117 posts)95. It pisses me off that Stephanopolous immediately turned the discussion to Hillary.
He asks Bernie why he's running, Bernie answers, and Stephanopolous immediately turns the conversation to Hillary. Where were the follow-up questions to the reasons Bernie actually gave? Where were the follow up questions about the wealth disparities between the 1% and the rest of Americans?
The media wants a dog fight.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
210 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
He didn't equate the Kochs to the Clinton foundation. He equated the politicans ...
Scuba
May 2015
#115
He needs to stop his wobbling.. and state clearly it is not the same as the Koch Bros.
boston bean
May 2015
#15
I did not see what you are talking about but I do know that he has been changing the subject
jwirr
May 2015
#51
seems ot be the knee jerk response the men like to give you BB. wonder why? nt
seabeyond
May 2015
#153
The issue was his criticism of the Clinton Foundation. If he says it he needs to respond
boston bean
May 2015
#160
I wouldn't necessarily suggest that anyone here is deliberately making things up.
Jackpine Radical
May 2015
#137
I did and it looked like it to me. i could be wrong but it looked like he did.
hrmjustin
May 2015
#18
Amazing how a self-declared Sanders supporter pretty much is constantly attacking him.
Bonobo
May 2015
#57
i do not find it strange at all. men, that have a strong need for status quo. nt
seabeyond
May 2015
#66
you and the men that have attacked womens issues for three years are now consistently attacking me
seabeyond
May 2015
#62
Still doesn't explain why you don't seem to be supporting a candidate you say you support.
Bonobo
May 2015
#70
when you ignore like a zillion posts i have made supporting and encouraging his campaign,
seabeyond
May 2015
#71
I simply could not wade through that "fool" post so didn't see anyone's post there. nt
Bonobo
May 2015
#72
they are all over the board, well before he declared. but wtf bonobo, find any post to pounce on
seabeyond
May 2015
#75
no. again, fabrications ot create your story, for your battle. critical of SUPPORTERS
seabeyond
May 2015
#87
people often times will make their political point and then come back with liking the person.
seabeyond
May 2015
#122
It pisses me off that Stephanopolous immediately turned the discussion to Hillary.
cyberswede
May 2015
#95
His position is that he isn't part of that class, so it follows that one would ask if
boston bean
May 2015
#106
The media is carefully avoiding the topic of money in general corrupting politics, which means
Fred Sanders
May 2015
#20
Irrelevant, to lump Hillary with givers of these large amounts who want to right sling this country
uponit7771
May 2015
#88
Ad homs are an indicator of a weak position, we'll see if there are more slung her way
uponit7771
May 2015
#206
+1, so Sanders is the first to fling mud rather than policy... sigh.. this shit is old already
uponit7771
May 2015
#83
Some DUers have done this. I'll wait to see if Bernie did, there are some differences of opinion.
PeaceNikki
May 2015
#30
No it is not. He is referring to obscene amount of money going into campaigns, mostly because of
still_one
May 2015
#46
It was in response to Bernies most recent criticism of the Clinton Foundation.
boston bean
May 2015
#48
2 Bostonians fighting. Meet up at the GraneryTavern on Milk st and hash it out.
Fla Dem
May 2015
#69
I hear your you, and you may have a point if he meant that linkage. First of all there is
still_one
May 2015
#60
Oh good lord, when you have to resort to lying you make both you and your candidate
LondonReign2
May 2015
#35
Clearly, I have provided exactly what he said. You will see that in any transcript.
boston bean
May 2015
#49
the guys are playing a game with you BB. now they are just jumping on that one. the giggles....
seabeyond
May 2015
#183
That is not his style. Now reports I have seen in the last couple of day regarding Bernie very
still_one
May 2015
#41
Oh please, provide the transcript in your posting that actually is relative to the OP.
boston bean
May 2015
#54
Dear Clinton Supporter one may to make yourself insignificant is to misrepresent
TheSarcastinator
May 2015
#67
Senator Sanders is concerned about big money dominating politics. I hope you agree.
rhett o rick
May 2015
#76
He isn't. And it looks desparate to try to twist his words to make him look bad.
rhett o rick
May 2015
#92
Didn't Bernie just say he would not say anything negative about Hillary Clinton?
leftofcool
May 2015
#90
Stephanopolous bent over backward to make whatever Bernie said be about Hillary
cyberswede
May 2015
#93
Bernie has been critical of the Clinton Foundation, that is what prompted the question.
boston bean
May 2015
#94
"Don't post direct evidence from the interview I'm freakout out about, it doesn't fit my narrative"
AgingAmerican
May 2015
#192
So constant outrage and hurt feelings is the way Hillary supporters will support their candidate?
BrotherIvan
May 2015
#114
Whose feelings are hurt... this is a campaign... are you feelings hurt by the criticism leveled in
boston bean
May 2015
#117
are you kidding? cause i brought up my issue, within sanders camp, as a supporter, you and others
seabeyond
May 2015
#125
So, aside from her gender, what it it about Hillary's policy goals that recommend her over Sanders?
lumberjack_jeff
May 2015
#120
how insignificant, right jack, being an advocate for women. i get, was drilled, educated that sander
seabeyond
May 2015
#128
There are plenty of women who find Sanders candor and policy goals worthy of support.
lumberjack_jeff
May 2015
#145
there are plenty of fundamentalist women that vote repug. your point? peoples priorities. right?
seabeyond
May 2015
#146
us women arent interested in your question and not our job to accommodate you.
seabeyond
May 2015
#161
I'm like what does he see so wrong with supporting Hillary because of her stance
boston bean
May 2015
#164
abso fuckin' lutely. we will watch this angle continue to play. the obvious tell is the same players
seabeyond
May 2015
#167
This is your thread. Your criticism of Sanders is that he's too hard on the Clinton foundation...
lumberjack_jeff
May 2015
#173
He said big money has ruined our once proud democracy. That is true. The Foundation is part of tha
Doctor_J
May 2015
#131
Seems Bernie could have handled this slightly differently and I bet money he will clarify
NoJusticeNoPeace
May 2015
#150
You'll have to try harder. Bernie is steering the conversation away from Clinton.
pa28
May 2015
#148
Big mistake from Bernie. I support Bernie, but he needs to watch what he says.
TerrapinFlyer
May 2015
#187
I don't like to nit-pick what people say. It's so easy for someone to insert or leave out an....
BlueJazz
May 2015
#190