Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(151,435 posts)
21. I'm sorry, but that's just silly.
Sun May 3, 2015, 01:03 PM
May 2015

Most of the manufacturing worldwide is of items that absolutely require automation. Every sort of electronic device is made of components that are impossible to make by hand. Without automation, you could not type on DU. So much of our technology would be impossible without automation. No human being can make a microprocessor or memory chip. It simply cannot be done. People put those parts together in the final assembly. That's it. And even that is becoming more automated.

How about automobiles? Every component in today's cars and trucks is made on automated equipment. Every component. Workers are needed to operate that automation, but an individual or even a group of individuals cannot manufacture those components by hand, from tires to the parts of an engine or transmission. There are a few cars that are assembled by hand and even with some parts made by hand. You cannot afford any of them. They are limited production luxury vehicles.

What about food products? Have you ever seen a food packaging line in operation? Automation does everything, from opening packaging and filling it with products to packing those packages in cases for shipping. Even the preparation of the actual food products is automated. If it weren't, you wouldn't be able to afford any of your favorite foods.

You want to eliminated automation? If so, you want to return to the 19th Century. That's not going to happen. It can't happen and still have the goods and technology we use every day.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

You want over 1/3 of the population to retire? Buzz Clik May 2015 #1
If your over 50, you will not be force to take SocSec, but it is a needed security net for CK_John May 2015 #3
How do you pay for it. Travis_0004 May 2015 #38
Well I quit working before I was 50 back in 2002 tech3149 May 2015 #40
The solution is to bring up this question as a nation, and have a talk about it: Nay May 2015 #2
Also a candidate needs to educate the voters to the process, they only propose programs CK_John May 2015 #6
Perfect response! tech3149 May 2015 #44
Halt automation?? Sinistrous May 2015 #4
A guaranteed minimum income would solve it. immoderate May 2015 #5
How so, if every job is automated? CK_John May 2015 #7
You won't depend on a job for income. immoderate May 2015 #11
Sharing the profits technology yields would be a start n/t leftstreet May 2015 #8
Sharing with who? CK_John May 2015 #10
You. Agschmid May 2015 #16
Halting automation would only work if we halted trade sufrommich May 2015 #9
The OP questioned who would take a position to halt automation??? Assumed answer nobody. CK_John May 2015 #12
Sorry, I misunderstood. nt sufrommich May 2015 #13
I think that's a false dilemma: Automation or no automation Populist_Prole May 2015 #14
All stats report on the increase in productivity (buzz word for automation)en CK_John May 2015 #15
Actually the MacJobs pay pretty well... Agschmid May 2015 #17
Lulz Jesus Malverde May 2015 #18
I don't think it's the "only solution". Trillo May 2015 #19
Your premise is flawed tkmorris May 2015 #20
I'm sorry, but that's just silly. MineralMan May 2015 #21
Reread the OP, I do not halt automation. CK_John May 2015 #22
I know that. I gave the reasons why MineralMan May 2015 #23
You keep flogging this turd. Ain't never going to happen. Throd May 2015 #24
Ridicule or awareness Jesus Malverde May 2015 #25
Ridicule. You can't stop automation. Throd May 2015 #26
I said it's unstoppable. Jesus Malverde May 2015 #27
Lower Social Security eligibility to 50 is not a realistic solution. Throd May 2015 #29
maybe not realistic Jesus Malverde May 2015 #30
They will be working elsewhere in the industry. Throd May 2015 #32
yep... or not Jesus Malverde May 2015 #33
Of course there will casualties. There always are. Throd May 2015 #36
. Jesus Malverde May 2015 #37
And halt computer use too! FLPanhandle May 2015 #28
Maybe one answer to automation... katsy May 2015 #31
Excellent suggestion and one worthy of consideration. Jesus Malverde May 2015 #34
"Only"? kentuck May 2015 #35
We need to change the focus from the system to the people daredtowork May 2015 #39
I'll say it one more time: hunter May 2015 #41
When you say 'halt automation', do you mean everything should be made by hand? pampango May 2015 #42
Automation in an era of declining population is a magnificent opportunity for a leap in wellbeing. Hortensis May 2015 #43
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The only solution to the ...»Reply #21