Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

daredtowork

(3,732 posts)
39. We need to change the focus from the system to the people
Sun May 3, 2015, 02:55 PM
May 2015

We are always looking at how to win at "competition" and "the economy" and bailing out big businesses in order to preserve the capitalist system. That's why we'd rather give millions to a guy who is already rich than help a family starving on welfare. The millionaire is (ostensibly) making the system go, while the family is a loose cog that fell off that wheel. That no longer even fits in the wheel. The problem is that the rapid pace of technological change means that wheel is always changing shape, so government "services" (training, resume polishing) can't fit those cogs in fast enough anymore.

There has to be a way to (slowly) rebuild the economy around people having jobs - so they automatically continue to receive their livelihood income and smoothly get retrained to do whatever is needed - rather than catering to the system itself. IMHO we should somehow try to discourage specialist job descriptions: that's one of the drivers of economic inequality. Instead have very broad educational categories: "Science", "Humanties", etc. People should be considered qualified to do any job within those categories. Instead of being laid off, workers should be traded/moved to other companies. Emphasis should be placed on society keeping the productivity/value of the worker, not the benefit of a particular capitalist.

If people can be billed continuously for rent/mortgage, student loans, child care, elder care, etc. then they should be able to DEMAND a continuous, regular source of income throughout their lives. I'm sure I'm a commie heretic for thinking my generation was betrayed by being subjected to regular work "gaps" and savings depletions that made it impossible to match all the rent-seeking demands. But it's my firm belief that the two sides need to be balanced with stability of livelihood for the individual so they will be able to shell out for all the rent-seekers throughout their lives.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

You want over 1/3 of the population to retire? Buzz Clik May 2015 #1
If your over 50, you will not be force to take SocSec, but it is a needed security net for CK_John May 2015 #3
How do you pay for it. Travis_0004 May 2015 #38
Well I quit working before I was 50 back in 2002 tech3149 May 2015 #40
The solution is to bring up this question as a nation, and have a talk about it: Nay May 2015 #2
Also a candidate needs to educate the voters to the process, they only propose programs CK_John May 2015 #6
Perfect response! tech3149 May 2015 #44
Halt automation?? Sinistrous May 2015 #4
A guaranteed minimum income would solve it. immoderate May 2015 #5
How so, if every job is automated? CK_John May 2015 #7
You won't depend on a job for income. immoderate May 2015 #11
Sharing the profits technology yields would be a start n/t leftstreet May 2015 #8
Sharing with who? CK_John May 2015 #10
You. Agschmid May 2015 #16
Halting automation would only work if we halted trade sufrommich May 2015 #9
The OP questioned who would take a position to halt automation??? Assumed answer nobody. CK_John May 2015 #12
Sorry, I misunderstood. nt sufrommich May 2015 #13
I think that's a false dilemma: Automation or no automation Populist_Prole May 2015 #14
All stats report on the increase in productivity (buzz word for automation)en CK_John May 2015 #15
Actually the MacJobs pay pretty well... Agschmid May 2015 #17
Lulz Jesus Malverde May 2015 #18
I don't think it's the "only solution". Trillo May 2015 #19
Your premise is flawed tkmorris May 2015 #20
I'm sorry, but that's just silly. MineralMan May 2015 #21
Reread the OP, I do not halt automation. CK_John May 2015 #22
I know that. I gave the reasons why MineralMan May 2015 #23
You keep flogging this turd. Ain't never going to happen. Throd May 2015 #24
Ridicule or awareness Jesus Malverde May 2015 #25
Ridicule. You can't stop automation. Throd May 2015 #26
I said it's unstoppable. Jesus Malverde May 2015 #27
Lower Social Security eligibility to 50 is not a realistic solution. Throd May 2015 #29
maybe not realistic Jesus Malverde May 2015 #30
They will be working elsewhere in the industry. Throd May 2015 #32
yep... or not Jesus Malverde May 2015 #33
Of course there will casualties. There always are. Throd May 2015 #36
. Jesus Malverde May 2015 #37
And halt computer use too! FLPanhandle May 2015 #28
Maybe one answer to automation... katsy May 2015 #31
Excellent suggestion and one worthy of consideration. Jesus Malverde May 2015 #34
"Only"? kentuck May 2015 #35
We need to change the focus from the system to the people daredtowork May 2015 #39
I'll say it one more time: hunter May 2015 #41
When you say 'halt automation', do you mean everything should be made by hand? pampango May 2015 #42
Automation in an era of declining population is a magnificent opportunity for a leap in wellbeing. Hortensis May 2015 #43
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The only solution to the ...»Reply #39