Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

McCamy Taylor

(19,240 posts)
24. He's just afraid the SCOTUS will be flooded by stupid rulings from judges who were "bought"
Sun May 3, 2015, 09:24 PM
May 2015

and the court will spend all its time trying to cover for these bought and paid for judges and their very wealthy clients. Obviously, it would better for him if only legislators are bought, then the laws they pass will only end up in the SCOTUS if they violate the Constitution.

For example, imagine that one of the Koch Brothers roasts and BBQs a baby on his front lawn--then pays off the judge in the civil case (the local prosecutor refuses to press charges on the grounds that the Koch Brothers own him) so that the family of the baby ends up having to pay the Kochs because their baby gave the Koch Brother indigestion thanks to the zany rulings of the judge over the civil case who is also owned by the Kochs. Since this is a civil case, there would be appeals and more appeals until finally the SCOTUS would be forced to choose between upholding the initial judgment which they will really want to do because the Kochs own them, too. But, on the other hand, who wants to be on record as saying that you can counter sue the parents of the baby you killed and ate because they did not raise a tasty baby?

Roberts is 100% about self interest. That is the only thing that separates him from Scalia and the others.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

EXACTLY! elleng Apr 2015 #1
Staggeringly cynical and simultaneously naive to the point of stupidity. (nt) enough Apr 2015 #2
Who would have thunk it! marym625 Apr 2015 #3
well that's because he is gay wilt the stilt May 2015 #28
So quid pro quo KT2000 Apr 2015 #4
Pretty much. If your goal is to ruin the nation. Enthusiast May 2015 #15
Wow dhol82 Apr 2015 #5
K & R. Revealing Roberts..! appalachiablue Apr 2015 #6
Based On This Language That Applies To Judges Can The Citizens United Decision Be Reopened And.... global1 Apr 2015 #7
heard Nina Totenberg read that on NPR and fell down laughing. rurallib Apr 2015 #8
Roberts is still a corporate hack. GeorgeGist Apr 2015 #9
And he's a fucking IDIOT. Of the first order. Any Chief Justice of the SCOTUS should know the calimary May 2015 #16
Ah... here's the entire oath Scootaloo May 2015 #21
He got it wrong, they had to redo it. mountain grammy May 2015 #25
Roberts is trying to have it both ways Gothmog Apr 2015 #10
He's an idiot. See above. calimary May 2015 #17
Scalia was pretty pissed off in his dissent. Orrex Apr 2015 #11
And HE'S a JERK! calimary May 2015 #18
That's his blessing on Pay to Play government. nt valerief Apr 2015 #12
Banana republicans dreamnightwind May 2015 #13
Which means their expanding clown car is turning into a banana boat! calimary May 2015 #23
Do politicans take oaths to advance the causes of their financial backers? RiverNoord May 2015 #14
VOTE! raven mad May 2015 #19
It's the infection of MBA's in our politics Scootaloo May 2015 #20
He's completely wrong. Politicians shouldn't hughee99 May 2015 #22
He's just afraid the SCOTUS will be flooded by stupid rulings from judges who were "bought" McCamy Taylor May 2015 #24
Now, that little tale is about the best explanation of the influence of money mountain grammy May 2015 #27
Twisted logic. kentuck May 2015 #26
Citizens United essentially legalized bribery blackspade May 2015 #29
Everything that is wrong with Citizen's united=Pay to play is wrong. midnight May 2015 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chief Justice Roberts Acc...»Reply #24