Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
109. Actually, the term social democratic is easier to understand until they are OTT. My sister, a bagger
Mon May 4, 2015, 05:45 AM
May 2015

recently got enlightened by the help she got from Obamacare, her hopes for women and gay rights from Hillary, getting on Social Security and Medicare.

It was warming her up. Want to know about this family member, take a look. I don't know that it will take 5 minutes, so perhaps you are having some eye or computer problems, as the post you said took you 5 minutes took me more life a half a dozen minutes, but then I understood the concept he's arging already.

So I may be wasting my time, and you may not want to read this tale of a big turnaround:

Called teabag relation yesterday although I didn't expect to do much good in Glennbeckistan.

Sounded the most rational I'd heard in years after the absolute hysteria I'd endured just before the election. It had been building up since 2008 and got worse from 2010 on. This is the post of what happened in November:

** Am copying what the link says for you below:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021449535#post15

So now I call her, not expecting much at all. Her mood was completely changed, she was relaxed and happy talking about how they are going to go on Medicare and all of that.

I deliberately hadn't called her for over a month. She didn't feel any need to talk about Obama at all this time. What happened, I didn't dare ask.

**Glennbeckistan on me. I didn't know that this article is what spurred the insanity for yesterday!

She was ranting about 'Obama going to foreign countries' making deals on importing millions of Mexicans to win elections. Said how they were are all being given driver licenses, put on welfare, so of course they would all vote for Democrats!

To which I said, we don't do that up here (upper Left Coast blue state) and you should talk to your Governor Perry about it being done down there. I went into how we didn't have many illegals except in the red areas where they're used for cheap labor.

She wanted to know why, and I said we are not a Right-to-Work (for less) state, our legislature doesn't give welfare to illegals, nor licenses, nor do they vote. She was mildly comforted at that idea, wasn't sure if Texas was doing it, but didn't bring up California at all. I doubt she knew.

I tried to shift the conversation over to a friend who'd just paid off her home and retired, put on solat panels, etc. That we were also making use of wind power and hydroelectric, etc. and our light company is non-profit. She said it'll never work in Texas, and I pointed out the large amount of wind turbines in the west part of the state I'd seen and even talked to those putting them up.

She said that had not worked out, but I said it had for those I knew who built them for their farms and used them to get off the grid. I suggested that with all that sunshine in Texas, it could lead the way with solar power. She said the weather was too bad. I remarked since we have 310+ million people and are predicted to have many more people by the turn of the century, we'll have to try harder.

That led her back to blaming that increase on illegal Mexicans having millions of babies on welfare so the Democrats would win elections. So she finally began to froth at the mouth, talking about how 'this isn't the country I grew up in!' and 'this is a Christian Nation, and 'if they don't like it they can go back to where they came from!'

I started to say that most Mexicans are Christians, but she was on a roll. Warmed up, she yelled, 'We can't take four more years of Obama turning us into Communism!' Grammatically incorrect, but what do you expect?

Mind you, her hubby, the sane one of the pair, is on Social Security and VA disability. She's been excited about going on Social Security herself, and their medical care is government supported and very good.

When she got louder about Obama, she yelled at me saying, wasn't I was scared about him getting re-elected? To which I said, 'No, I'm not worried about it at all. No one up here is.' That's when the frothing began, how could I not be concerned about how he will end this nation and she pulled out her final verbal weapon...

How Obama is bringing in Sharia Law!!!. Finally rounded up with 'If I have to, I'll take up arms, although I've never fired a gun, and I'll kill anyone who tries to do it.'

At that point I had to bite my tongue and not say if she'd just stay home, no one would notice her and no one was coming to get her to convert. Actually I think she'd look cuter in a burka than that sofa throw cover she walks around in.

Somewhere in the middle of the diatribe, she also went into how she's met people in the Tea Party, that the media is lying about them, they are really nice and never rude or violent like the Occupy people. Who she said are running loose raping people, defecating everywhere, drunk and scumbags, etc. (Shades of Breitbart.)

I thought she was coming back to Sanity a while back after the 47% uproar, but hate radio and FOX has pulled her right back into her alternative reality, and it's really scary. What a weird way to end the evening. Fortunately, her husband got her off the phone...

Sigh. And this story was a trigger for her.

So....


She recently even asked me about socialism. Mind you this woman could not tell the difference between a C. And S. and a D.S. And his has been going on with her for over a dozen years!

I explained the difference between D.S. and S., and I did ot by explaining it as a sort of way of treating everyone equally. That it's more about We're All In This Together than Everyman For Himself.

That it has worked well in Scandinavia and the Anglosphere. She saw that as a positive. Now she's going to vote for HRC, but might even with time vote for BS. She is retired and FNN just lost another sucker.

So unless your family is extremely difficult, explaing what Bernie is about in New Deal terms or democratic socialism works very well. AFAIK>

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Some advice for Sanders supporters [View all] struggle4progress May 2015 OP
GET OUT THE FUCKING VOTE GOTFV but, many will NOT be allowed to vote, if unconstitutional ID randys1 May 2015 #1
this might be a good time to ensure that all potential voters... Buzz Clik May 2015 #30
Unconstitutional to require ID...see how this works is they create a hurdle that is ILLEGAL randys1 May 2015 #57
Give in? Until the law is declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, it's the law. Buzz Clik May 2015 #59
Most of us that has a residence is fine & will be there JonLP24 May 2015 #90
Giving in by allowing unconstitutional laws to be put in place in the first place randys1 May 2015 #61
When Bernie wins the primary... Cosmic Kitten May 2015 #2
Getting Democrats elected is a big purpose for DU. Thinkingabout May 2015 #3
I'm not sure that's legal. mythology May 2015 #7
It's not really, haha. Agschmid May 2015 #18
You DO know that Campaign "A" can't give Campaign "B" "lots of cash"? brooklynite May 2015 #48
I think they can give it to the National Committee though. nt Snotcicles May 2015 #51
Nope...same limits brooklynite May 2015 #52
Give it to the party than. nt Snotcicles May 2015 #56
Sanders team should highlight his brand of socialism as defined by Einstein and Henry Wallace. blm May 2015 #4
Hardly anybody will remember who Henry Wallace was; and his background was progressive Republican struggle4progress May 2015 #22
Wallace has become better known with internet shares of his anti-fascism commentary. blm May 2015 #28
I knew someone who worked out at California JonLP24 May 2015 #93
You seem to be living in the past, re: the kneejerk association of socialism with totalitarianism daredtowork May 2015 #69
huh? blm May 2015 #80
Yes I meant to reply to the OP daredtowork May 2015 #83
Did you mean yellow dog Dem? A blue dog Dem is pretty conservative--sort of Republican light. nt tblue37 May 2015 #5
yep. thanks for the correction struggle4progress May 2015 #8
Freudian slip I guess n/t Ichingcarpenter May 2015 #39
LOL deutsey May 2015 #67
LMAO L0oniX May 2015 #75
No doubt. Rex May 2015 #81
Funny how they want to give advice, yet have no idea about the Democratic Party. Rex May 2015 #79
you make some good points, but let me correct you on this: cali May 2015 #6
Thanks. It's great if he supports $15/hr struggle4progress May 2015 #10
No if. Bernie has long advocated for a living wage- as in for many, many years cali May 2015 #14
I don't mean "living wage" -- I mean $15 struggle4progress May 2015 #25
advcated specifically for that too. Hey, what's Hillary's position? cali May 2015 #34
Clinton will probably have enough $$$ to buy organization so she may not need struggle4progress May 2015 #41
There is no conflict, a living wage is higher than $15/hr in most (but not all) places Dragonfli May 2015 #45
Good start but cilla4progress May 2015 #16
I suggest reading his economic plan for America which covers all that- and more cali May 2015 #17
We are definitely going to need cilla4progress May 2015 #43
I'd be as interested in Karl Rove's advice. Marr May 2015 #9
Have a lovely day struggle4progress May 2015 #11
LMFAO L0oniX May 2015 #74
K & R nt okaawhatever May 2015 #12
That sounds like practical advice treestar May 2015 #13
You got it right this time. BrotherIvan May 2015 #20
You don't even seem to know Bernie's positions. His candidacy will be a big voter draw here in Bluenorthwest May 2015 #15
. Agschmid May 2015 #19
Nice summary! peacebird May 2015 #27
Check out the Bernie Sanders Bulletin Board for more! Agschmid May 2015 #31
women's issues stage left May 2015 #91
These positions are too radical for most Americans to handle. Major Hogwash May 2015 #117
Do you think LWolf May 2015 #21
I am worried about the same thing, I live in NYS, the only real vote to cast is primary but Dragonfli May 2015 #46
In '08, LWolf May 2015 #47
Totally agree BrotherIvan May 2015 #23
After our 2010 state legislature loss here, due to low turnout, gerrymandering handed our state over struggle4progress May 2015 #24
Welcome to my world. Major Hogwash May 2015 #120
I don't accept advice from Teabaggers or others significantly to my right. DisgustipatedinCA May 2015 #26
I suspect internet chatter is no substitute for dialing phones and jingling doorbells: struggle4progress May 2015 #29
Thank you for yet more advice that I won't need from you. DisgustipatedinCA May 2015 #32
Have a lovely day! struggle4progress May 2015 #33
that right there is what gives the Sanders campaign a bad name.. some of his supporters on DU who Cha May 2015 #50
Hey there, big brave keyboard warrior. DisgustipatedinCA May 2015 #60
Oh no.. you're the "big brave keyboard warrior" always dropping mean spirted crap and not expecting Cha May 2015 #63
It's hard to receive pushback when you misdirect it to someone else. DisgustipatedinCA May 2015 #96
Here's my answer...SS is Socialism, free Education is Socialism, free Fire and Police are Socialism, libdem4life May 2015 #35
Try that argument on some relatives/friends who aren't as liberal as you... brooklynite May 2015 #37
Oh, I have. They get glassy-eyed, but I always win. You can't deny it. Do you pay when the fire libdem4life May 2015 #38
But I would contend they don't see that as "socialism"...and honestly, neither do I brooklynite May 2015 #40
Clearly, you don't me or my family. This has been going on for 45 years. Has nothing to do with libdem4life May 2015 #44
Actually, the term social democratic is easier to understand until they are OTT. My sister, a bagger freshwest May 2015 #109
Of course. But you assume the general electorate actually listens to rational argument. Adrahil May 2015 #111
I don't consider it an argument. I just present it as fact...ends the discussion. libdem4life May 2015 #112
Here's a clue...neither candidate will run a 50 State Strategy... brooklynite May 2015 #36
I suspect you're right but it breaks my heart struggle4progress May 2015 #42
Advice from you? 99Forever May 2015 #49
+10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Phlem May 2015 #54
^^^THIS^^^ L0oniX May 2015 #73
And OP doesn't know the difference between DINOs and yellowdogs...but IS a DEM... Rex May 2015 #82
When I first read this post, he described himself as a blue dog. Marr May 2015 #84
I just wish blue dogs had the guts to admit to it here and stop pretending to be liberals. nt Rex May 2015 #85
Yeah: that was sloppy of me struggle4progress May 2015 #97
Excellent advice from someone who's had so much experience on the ground. LOL @ these Bernie Cha May 2015 #53
! Phlem May 2015 #55
Project much? Katashi_itto May 2015 #58
You know it's true.. and that's all you have. Figures. Cha May 2015 #62
Lol...again project much? Katashi_itto May 2015 #64
Parrot much. Cha May 2015 #65
Only if its true. See #58 Katashi_itto May 2015 #66
And we've still got a long way to go! Major Hogwash May 2015 #68
I don't think Bernie would be proud of some of the bully supporters around here Cha May 2015 #71
Oh, I agree totally. Major Hogwash May 2015 #72
Hey Cha sheshe2 May 2015 #107
I was on that Jury, too. You should have been asleep there, Bah-stun! freshwest May 2015 #115
Lol~ sheshe2 May 2015 #116
Advice for Clinton supporters Aerows May 2015 #70
The panicked, almost hysterical SUPPORT from this man's supporters here is bizarre and unsettling Number23 May 2015 #76
Watch and learn. n/t 99Forever May 2015 #77
Yeah, I'm "watching" this place go off the deep end. Again. Number23 May 2015 #78
Oh I know... 99Forever May 2015 #87
See what I mean about hysterical, "panicked" support? Thanks for proving my point. Number23 May 2015 #100
Of course I did... 99Forever May 2015 #110
This post doesn't make a bit of sense. It's obvious you want to refute something I've said Number23 May 2015 #113
Simply put: 99Forever May 2015 #118
There was nothing condescending and sure as hell nothing untrue in my post Number23 May 2015 #119
Sad truth, I think they are like that in RL and have no idea. nt. Rex May 2015 #121
Ain't that the truth. n/t 99Forever May 2015 #122
Like what, Rex? Like "what" in real life? Number23 May 2015 #123
"hysterical"? How sexist! nt Bonobo May 2015 #92
The hysteria comes especially when they're using rw sites to try and make their rw talking points.. Cha May 2015 #94
Interesting that a Republican polling firm polled her unfavorability rating lower than national ones JonLP24 May 2015 #98
I really must not pay attention at all to Fox News JonLP24 May 2015 #95
I liked Dean too. I learned alot about Kucinich's time in Ohio from DUers here. It wasn't pretty Number23 May 2015 #101
He seems to be saying the things to appeal to those "Warren supporters" JonLP24 May 2015 #102
Re: "....they can blanket DU with thread after thread...." chknltl May 2015 #103
Here sheshe2 May 2015 #104
Yes, that garnered a 7-0 for Leave It Alone. Will not be alerting for a day, I guess. n/t freshwest May 2015 #105
Stupid Fucking Alert! sheshe2 May 2015 #106
Thanks fresh and sheshe! Number23 May 2015 #114
Socialism modeled after Canada & Europe fadedrose May 2015 #86
Sanders already knows what he believes AgingAmerican May 2015 #88
I've seen philosphical articles from the RW JonLP24 May 2015 #89
A question for everyone else. How will all the answers pan out to the issues mmonk May 2015 #99
The R's will call any D candidate a "socialist" quaker bill May 2015 #108
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Some advice for Sanders s...»Reply #109