Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

boston bean

(36,941 posts)
Mon May 4, 2015, 08:30 AM May 2015

For those who seem to forget.... [View all]

SCOTUS Citizens United was brought on because of a RW movie about Hillary Rodham Clinton back in 2008.


Hillary: The Movie is a 2008 political documentary about United States Senator and presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. It was produced by Citizens United. The film was scheduled to be offered as video-on-demand on cable TV right before the Democratic primaries in January 2008, but the federal government blocked it.[1] The blocking of the film's airing was the subject of the court case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. The documentary interviewed various conservative figures such as Dick Morris and Ann Coulter and reviewed various scandals in which Hillary Clinton allegedly participated, such as the White House travel office controversy, White House FBI files controversy, Whitewater controversy, and cattle future controversy.[2]

In early 2008, the case, known as Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, was brought to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. This court sided with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) that Hillary: The Movie could not be shown on television right before the 2008 Democratic primaries under the McCain-Feingold Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act.[3]

The Supreme Court docketed this case on August 18, 2008,[4] and heard oral arguments on March 24, 2009.[5][6][7] A decision was expected sometime in the early summer months of 2009.[8] However, on June 29, 2009, the Supreme Court issued an order directing the parties to re-argue the case on September 9 after issuing briefs on larger issues. The court ruled 5-4 in 2010 that spending limits in the McCain-Feingold act were unconstitutional, allowing essentially unlimited contributions by corporations and unions to political action committees. This was one of the most controversial rulings of the term.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary:_The_Movie

Clinton states this:

"We need to fix our dysfunctional political system and get unaccountable money out of it once and for all—even if it takes a constitutional amendment," Clinton said in opening remarks at a roundtable event with Kirkwood students and instructors.


Seems like Bernie may be mimicking her. There is nothing there folks, but a reality that she swims in the waters with the sharks. She is not responsible for Citizens United. She was against it, before it even happened.... But believe it or not, the evil Hillary doesn't make supreme court decisions. You play by the rules that are there at the given time. Bernie is being completely disingenuous... and to try and to make it seem as though she is some fundraising pariah, he links up the RW Clinton Foundation smears to try to get it to stick. The reality is not even close.

52 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
For those who seem to forget.... [View all] boston bean May 2015 OP
A lot of people don't know the origin of CU, sufrommich May 2015 #1
If they only researched a little bit. boston bean May 2015 #2
Thank you for posting this. leftofcool May 2015 #3
You're welcome... the truth of the matter has to be said by someone! LOL boston bean May 2015 #5
Well well well, dancing with the blame game Iliyah May 2015 #4
Good post ismnotwasm May 2015 #6
except Bernie has been focusing on the problem of big money in politics cali May 2015 #7
Proof of the big money problems... boston bean May 2015 #8
do you consider Zephyr Teachout right wing, bean? cali May 2015 #10
Proof please, spell it out to me.... boston bean May 2015 #15
gad cali May 2015 #20
Ok, so more RW Clinton Foundation bullshit... boston bean May 2015 #21
you are wrong, and you can't even come up with the slimmest refutation cali May 2015 #27
I'm not going to worry myself with feelings about wrong doings. I deal with the facts. You got some boston bean May 2015 #28
creating your own "facts" is not the same as dealing with actual facts cali May 2015 #41
My own facts??? what are my own facts???? boston bean May 2015 #42
I guess you were supposed to buy the DURHAM D May 2015 #44
"I don't care what mouthpiece it comes from, it's just repeating bullshit." hootinholler May 2015 #30
nice hootinholler... you are good with the personal insults. boston bean May 2015 #31
Post removed Post removed May 2015 #34
Is there a sliver of difference between Bernie and Hillary regarding Citizens United? boston bean May 2015 #35
You could have just pointed out that their views are the same in your OP cyberswede May 2015 #39
The overarching point was they sound like one another. boston bean May 2015 #40
I wasn't making any comment on Citizens United hootinholler May 2015 #45
Ok. What are you, my father. Like I said boston bean May 2015 #46
Mimicking her eh? TM99 May 2015 #9
making shit up to fit your narrative. it's a pretty crumby thing to do. cali May 2015 #11
Yes, it is. TM99 May 2015 #12
you know what's funny? there are some valid ways to oppose/attack cali May 2015 #13
I already pointed them out to you. boston bean May 2015 #37
Damn. DURHAM D May 2015 #14
The over reaction to this is quite telling imho. boston bean May 2015 #17
a reply to an Op is an overreaction? Wow. merrily May 2015 #19
read them... LOL boston bean May 2015 #23
I did Seems like a relatively tame thread to me. merrily May 2015 #26
people tend to react to obvious mendacious shit. shocker. cali May 2015 #32
This is obvious mendacious shit?? boston bean May 2015 #33
Claiming Bernie is "mimicking" her on this issue? Yeah. Sure is. cali May 2015 #36
Is there a shred of difference between their position... NO. boston bean May 2015 #38
One person's "unaccountable" is another person's "oops, I didn't realize Algeria was foreign!" n/t lumberjack_jeff May 2015 #49
Lobbyists do it all the time. Not formally, of course, but they write many bills. merrily May 2015 #18
No kidding? I didn't know. DURHAM D May 2015 #22
That is your problelm. merrily May 2015 #24
Damn, you obviously can't read either. TM99 May 2015 #47
What is with the insults and why DURHAM D May 2015 #48
How precious. TM99 May 2015 #50
I like Bernie. He is a good man. DURHAM D May 2015 #51
Again with snark and insults? TM99 May 2015 #52
Apparently, not being able to file a bill yourself = not being able to condemn a SCOTUS decision merrily May 2015 #43
The movie was a hit piece on Hillary. Of course, she was against the decision that said it could not merrily May 2015 #16
DU rec...nt SidDithers May 2015 #25
I like that quote you have. Iliyah May 2015 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»For those who seem to for...