Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

cali

(114,904 posts)

6. as the article details, there's really no way to do that

Reply to Buns_of_Fire (Reply #5)

Mon May 4, 2015, 09:26 AM

May 2015

"resolution" won't end it as an issue.

I think she probably will go with the obfuscating. hell she already is. I think that's political calculation that is nothing short of political cowardice.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

TPA (fast track) A lose-lose choice for Hillary Clinton [View all] cali May 2015 OP

kick cali May 2015 #1

HRC is a very powerful woman, but KMOD May 2015 #2

I'm damned sure she's the most influential member of the democratic party cali May 2015 #4

What an incredible... sendero May 2015 #3

I imagine if I were her, I'd just say as little as possible about it Buns_of_Fire May 2015 #5

as the article details, there's really no way to do that cali May 2015 #6

I think she's skilled enough to talk her way around it without really taking a position. Buns_of_Fire May 2015 #7

except she already has the reputation of being a slippery politician cali May 2015 #10

Has Bill Clinton aspirant May 2015 #8

. stevenleser May 2015 #9

..... cali May 2015 #11

Close, HDS. nt stevenleser May 2015 #12