Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Mon May 4, 2015, 10:04 AM May 2015

Bill Clinton: Foundation's done nothing 'knowingly inappropriate' [View all]

Former President Bill Clinton dismissed the controversy over foreign donations to his family's foundation, saying in a testy interview that the charitable organization has "never done anything knowingly inappropriate."

"There is no doubt in my mind that we have never done anything knowingly inappropriate in terms of taking money to influence any kind of American government policy," he said in an interview that aired Monday on NBC's "Today" show. "That just hasn't happened."

The Clinton Foundation's fundraising practices have drawn scrutiny as Hillary Clinton launches her second run for president. Critics have raised questions about donations from foreign governments that had projects or financial interests under Clinton's jurisdiction during her time as secretary of State.

<snip>

But his defense of the Clinton Foundation weren't his only comments from Monday morning that are likely to spark controversy. Republican attack group America Rising was already blasting Clinton's comments confirming he'd continue giving paid speeches — which can draw half a million dollars in speaking fees — even as his wife runs for president.

"I gotta pay our bills," he said. "And I also give a lot of it to the foundation every year."

http://www.cnn.com/2015/05/04/politics/bill-clinton-defends-clinton-foundation/

45 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
That depends on what "knowingly" ...is ...is. L0oniX May 2015 #1
they're gonna have to keep Bill on a short leash- that line about cali May 2015 #6
Hey, it's hard out there for a pimp. B2G May 2015 #19
I am not calling him anything of the sort cali May 2015 #20
Settle down, I'm not saying you were B2G May 2015 #27
Nail on head. nt cwydro May 2015 #30
I guess it depends on what he means by ... GeorgeGist May 2015 #2
Of course MosheFeingold May 2015 #3
"They are no more progressives than Bush Jr is a MENSA member" Bwahahahaha L0oniX May 2015 #8
You can have an International Foundation, or you can be Secretary of State. You can't have both. NYC_SKP May 2015 #4
that actually is the bottom line cali May 2015 #9
Wouldn't be the first time he "got ahead of his judgement". L0oniX May 2015 #10
what gets me, is that even after all this negative focus on cali May 2015 #15
. stevenleser May 2015 #5
They just don't care. NCTraveler May 2015 #22
The period plus that link will be my standard response to these OPs. stevenleser May 2015 #26
I don't think anyone has suggested it has. JayhawkSD May 2015 #7
I don't think that is correct. What liberal critics are saying isn't that cali May 2015 #12
Did you read the part where I said that... JayhawkSD May 2015 #44
Even the appearance of impropriety should have been eschewed. closeupready May 2015 #11
yes,the lack of judgment is a big honking problem and they don't seem to cali May 2015 #13
Agreed. closeupready May 2015 #14
"...no controlling legal authority." cherokeeprogressive May 2015 #16
could you elaborate on what you're saying by using that quote? cali May 2015 #17
Sure. "knowingly inappropriate" are "weasel words" just like Gore's testimony was. cherokeeprogressive May 2015 #36
Yawn trumad May 2015 #18
does money buy access? cali May 2015 #21
Did money buy access? boston bean May 2015 #25
of course it bought access- cali May 2015 #29
Ridiculous. You are making it seem like there boston bean May 2015 #32
NO. I did not infer that there was any quid pro quo. And I posted Facts cali May 2015 #33
That is exactly what Schweizer says too. boston bean May 2015 #34
wrong. he strongly infers that there are quid pro quos cali May 2015 #35
I'll wait for Obama to make a stink about it. boston bean May 2015 #37
of course you will. why think for yourself when you can have Obama do it? cali May 2015 #38
Better than zephyr and teachout, no?? boston bean May 2015 #39
Did you wait also for Obama to make a stink about Abu Ghraib and US war crimes Bonobo May 2015 #45
Double Yawn trumad May 2015 #42
Right-Wing media and DUers unite to attack Democrats. nt onehandle May 2015 #23
+1 LordGlenconner May 2015 #24
sorry, Zephyr Teachout? NOT right wing. far fucking from it. cali May 2015 #31
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words May 2015 #28
The GOP wishes you would stop talking about it... kentuck May 2015 #40
The repeated violations of the Memorandum of Understanding says otherwise. AtomicKitten May 2015 #41
Once upon a time, Bill was just Slick Willie Dems to Win May 2015 #43
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bill Clinton: Foundation'...