Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

True Blue Door

(2,969 posts)
58. What's that childhood game where you just randomly insert words into sentences?
Mon May 4, 2015, 10:41 AM
May 2015

You seem to be playing that game, only you're inserting an entire alternate universe into a conversation.

The point is, you want them silenced. I'm puzzled how this jives with your proclaimed fierce support of freedom of speech.


If Vladimir Putin wants to spread his psychotic views he can write a damn book like Hitler did, not hijack the whole damn internet with armies of paid trolls flooding fake comments to spew lies 24/7 like the bastard love child of the Ministry of Truth and Nyarlathotep. That's a far bigger danger to freedom than the long odds you'll accidentally happen upon one of the five actual liberals in the world who support Putin and make them feel unwelcome.

if often seems as if many DU'ers only suddenly become concerned with and hypoeractively supportive of "free speech" when it's specifically hate speech against Muslims


I see nothing of the sort, and furthermore, seeing resistance to terrorism as an attack on Muslims is some pretty nasty crypto-bigotry. Is that how you see them - in the acts of the radicals who bully and tyrannize them? That's like going into a cancer ward and not being able to distinguish the patients from their tumors. No wonder you think supporting Vladimir Putin is a real thing.

I mean you know, journalists are being corralled in Baltimore, and beaten by police if they dare leave the bullpen... Whistleblowers face prosecution from corporations and the government


And you have the ability to post your own threads about those subjects and every other deliberate distraction you can namedrop, but instead you're here trying to stop others from talking about people being murdered for "offending Islam." That, and the psychopathic rationalizations of same, is the subject of this thread.

You know, just like i didn't excuse the shooters, or "blame america first' or any of hte other cockamamie stuff you've imagined thus far.


So your very first post here wasn't to dismiss the entire subject by noting the lack of civilian deaths in Texas, even though the OP doesn't directly mention the recent incident? Your very next post after that wasn't a laundry list of "Yeahbut" accusations against the United States that you apparently felt somehow meant we shouldn't be discussing this subject? You haven't spent the whole time obsessively trying to change the subject and demonizing everyone who won't play your game?

Well, for starters, we're talking about Garland, Texas.


You are talking about Garland, Texas. The OP is talking about people being murdered for "insulting Islam," which happens all over the world, and the demented perverts who respond to those incidents by blaming the victims.

And for some apparently compelling reason, you don't want anyone talking about that - so desperately, in fact, that instead of just posting new threads about all those other issues you say we should talk about instead, you're still here, trying to drown out the subject with an endless spew of evasions and lies.

Second, my criticism is that you, like so many others, are going to be vastly more outraged...


Yeahbut, yeahbut, yeahbut...more evasions, subject changes, and lies. The subject is still the moral perversion of people who blame the victims of Islamic terrorist attacks.

You just got done howling about the evils of Muslim nations, you know.


You mean, stating the fact that Muslims are oppressed by the people you don't want me criticizing, and advocating for their religious freedom - which apparently also infuriates you? Yeah, I just got done doing my job as a liberal in a discussion on a liberal website, and you're doing the exact opposite. So that raises a deeper question: Why do you post on DU if you despise the people here, and the values we represent? Why do you even think it appropriate to do so?

And due to the overwhelming amount of islamophobia on DU


If people tripping all over themselves to be inclusive, and drowning everything they say on the subject in caveats and Sensitivity Training language to avoid giving offense to anyone who isn't determined to find it...if that is "overwhelming Islamophobia" in your eyes, the problem is yours. If you see "overwhelming Islamophobia" among a bunch of left-wing liberals, your views are beyond extreme. And the question remains why you think it appropriate to participate in a forum whose population you demonize as corrupt bigots.

or i could keep expressing my freedom of speech to inform you that i find your wild-eyed, pulpit-pounding nonsense to be fairly loathsome and irritating.


Repeatedly, without meaningful variation. Also known as...

[img][/img]

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This x infinity. Well said NT. Ex Lurker May 2015 #1
fundie religions attract lunatics gwheezie May 2015 #2
You know the only people killed were the suspects, right? Scootaloo May 2015 #3
That's good to know. It wasn't clear earlier. True Blue Door May 2015 #10
You know what bothers me? Scootaloo May 2015 #18
Tolerance and sympathy for religious madmen is acceptable because... police brutality? Kurska May 2015 #22
I don't recall saying it was acceptable. Scootaloo May 2015 #30
You've vented more spleen at the OP than you have at the gunman. Kurska May 2015 #62
Well, they failed and are now very dead. Scootaloo May 2015 #73
I would usually view attempted murder as a more serious offense than disagreeing with me. Kurska May 2015 #74
By far. Which is why those two dudes are dead Scootaloo May 2015 #75
There's a word for that kind of comment: "Yeahbutting." True Blue Door May 2015 #29
Not at all Scootaloo May 2015 #31
So you deny yeahbutting, then immediately yeahbut. True Blue Door May 2015 #35
Only if "yeahbut" is a meaningless neologism Scootaloo May 2015 #43
A "yeahbut" is what happens when bigotry is confronted by inconvenient reality. True Blue Door May 2015 #44
You realize you just typed five brief paragraphs of nothing, right? Scootaloo May 2015 #45
I took the nothing that you're saying and ran with it. True Blue Door May 2015 #46
Nope. I simply find this "discussion" repetitious and obnoxious Scootaloo May 2015 #47
This is all projection, repeated immediately after I just said the same things to YOU: True Blue Door May 2015 #51
No, it's actual quotes from your posts, where you squawk like Joseph Farah Scootaloo May 2015 #54
What's that childhood game where you just randomly insert words into sentences? True Blue Door May 2015 #58
Mad Libs!! PeaceNikki May 2015 #59
Ahhhh, yeah that's the one. True Blue Door May 2015 #60
Seems like an ODDLY appropriate name, no? PeaceNikki May 2015 #61
Yes, indeed. True Blue Door May 2015 #63
That post of yours IS a Gish gallop Yorktown May 2015 #83
The attackers shot an unarmed security guard. SunSeeker May 2015 #20
I love how you immediately try to make like I said it was okay Scootaloo May 2015 #21
You ignore that the attackers shot someone. SunSeeker May 2015 #26
I do not think a calf wound is worthy of an existential "clash of civilizations" rant. Scootaloo May 2015 #32
A bullet to the leg is worth at least a rant. SunSeeker May 2015 #72
Linking the two is emminently reasonable and justified muriel_volestrangler May 2015 #50
Really? I was aiming for tired and fed-up Scootaloo May 2015 #53
Who killed them? treestar May 2015 #55
My understanding is that it was the police, yeah Scootaloo May 2015 #57
K & R nt okaawhatever May 2015 #4
So who won the contest? JaneyVee May 2015 #5
Everyone attending. This was their jackpot. Scootaloo May 2015 #6
+1 beam me up scottie May 2015 #13
+1 jeff47 May 2015 #68
not sure. linuxman May 2015 #41
Gellar. Just the way she intended to. hifiguy May 2015 #70
Thank you. Thank you. JDPriestly May 2015 #7
Good rant there. n/t freshwest May 2015 #8
Thank you. It is also not "liberalism" to accept misogyny in certain other foreign cultures pnwmom May 2015 #9
Very important points. Either we believe in our own values or we don't. True Blue Door May 2015 #12
It's even more odd that our Government, which speaks for us, has so many allies whose cultures sabrina 1 May 2015 #15
Some have been speaking out for decades. pnwmom May 2015 #17
Hillary Clinton agrees with you! bettyellen May 2015 #79
Great point. romanic May 2015 #81
I don't believe in absolutes, sorry Warpy May 2015 #11
The Christians who did that were WRONG and that doesn't excuse the people who do it now. pnwmom May 2015 #14
Mostly by consent. LiberalAndProud May 2015 #16
The dissidents generally know what they're up against Warpy May 2015 #19
There is a difference between having no power to change a thing LiberalAndProud May 2015 #24
Fine, go do it in THEIR countries. Warpy May 2015 #71
They have those laws by "common consent" because challenging them True Blue Door May 2015 #23
+1 EOM Kurska May 2015 #25
The RW kooks who sponsored this, 'Art Exhibit" AgingAmerican May 2015 #27
Or maybe they just wanted to LiberalAndProud May 2015 #33
Yeah, probably. They're assholes, but they're within their rights. True Blue Door May 2015 #34
It's amazing AgingAmerican May 2015 #36
This message was self-deleted by its author True Blue Door May 2015 #37
Note the sarcasm tag AgingAmerican May 2015 #38
Ah, sorry. The syntax is very confusing. True Blue Door May 2015 #39
There is no rationalizing terrorism, especially religious terrorism AgingAmerican May 2015 #40
There's an interesting allegory about desert sand. True Blue Door May 2015 #42
My point being AgingAmerican May 2015 #66
We will. The world will be completely off of fossil fuels by mid-century. True Blue Door May 2015 #67
Except McVeigh killed people. Lots of them. geek tragedy May 2015 #48
K & R SunSeeker May 2015 #28
Very well said. sufrommich May 2015 #49
amen. PeaceNikki May 2015 #52
No one is excusing these gunmen treestar May 2015 #56
True, but fadedrose May 2015 #64
Would you be okay with the same thing "Not hurting Christians by insulting Jesus" Kurska May 2015 #65
I'm close to being an athiest fadedrose May 2015 #76
There's a massive difference between calling someone a racial slur True Blue Door May 2015 #69
where are the leftists cheering for murder? Doctor_J May 2015 #77
++ thread. There is no excuse for physical attacks on people criticizing an ideology. Yorktown May 2015 #78
thank you rollin74 May 2015 #80
Why can't I be against both again? booley May 2015 #82
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Taking a radical right-wi...»Reply #58