Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What Pam Gellar did is akin to.... [View all]leftynyc
(26,060 posts)31. You keep posting that
as if it actually means anything. Your OP was ridiculous and you apparently don't like being told that so you think you can play games with language. Either defend your position or delete the post because you're wasting everyone's time.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
115 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If your willful actions to provoke puts innocent people in danger, then yes.
Tommy_Carcetti
May 2015
#3
So do you honestly think it is okay to intentionally try to provoke violence....
Tommy_Carcetti
May 2015
#74
If there exists enough intimidation and threats of violence to stop people from showing cartoons
FLPanhandle
May 2015
#89
No, we don't need people to intentionally create violent flashpoints for selfish means.
Tommy_Carcetti
May 2015
#93
I think the end game for humans is to embrace science and technology and not mythology
snooper2
May 2015
#67
Here's the thing about rights- they don't give a flying fuck about the 'end game'.
X_Digger
May 2015
#110
It's what many self called Christians do daily and have for hundreds of years......
AuntPatsy
May 2015
#17
Real stupidity often involves courses of action that only make a problem worse
Martin Eden
May 2015
#82
But exactly who are we comparing to the sharks, which have no choice in how they behave?
Gidney N Cloyd
May 2015
#5
OK, exactly who are we saying are analagous to the sharks, which have no choice in how they behave?
Gidney N Cloyd
May 2015
#26
Thank you. And I believe a metaphor might be "Pam Geller chummed the waters to draw the sharks."
Gidney N Cloyd
May 2015
#87
Do you think the people who tried to shoot-up Geller's event are like sharks with no moral will?
Nuclear Unicorn
May 2015
#6
if that'sthe case the the person who yells fire in a crowded theater,causes a panic and some
Romeo.lima333
May 2015
#27
that article is on the limits of free speech -and didnt answer the question
Romeo.lima333
May 2015
#37
No- if anyone incited it would be those who said people who draw Mohammad must die
Lee-Lee
May 2015
#23
HARDLY. "Incitement to riot" is exactly and precisely that, exhortation, rabble-rousing. Not a DRAW-
WinkyDink
May 2015
#38
she did what charlie hebdo does and one is cheered and the other villified
Romeo.lima333
May 2015
#19
Neither art nor "art" is or ever was the CAUSE of murder, except to the deranged murderer.
WinkyDink
May 2015
#36
Precisely equivalent, not at all, I agree. Sufficiently so to merit comparison?
Lizzie Poppet
May 2015
#101
As a gay person, I'm used to Geller's ilk although they are usually religious clergy or GOP
Bluenorthwest
May 2015
#63
I think your OP is chumming the waters to rile up lovers of free speech.
Binkie The Clown
May 2015
#72