Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: For years, Bernie Sanders has spoken out against big money in politics. HRC is the poster [View all]morningfog
(18,115 posts)82. And the consequence of his votes has been reelection and promotion for 30 years.
And now a presidential run.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
83 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
For years, Bernie Sanders has spoken out against big money in politics. HRC is the poster [View all]
cali
May 2015
OP
He has not spoken any lies. Those that are pushing this meme are dishonest if they can't
rhett o rick
May 2015
#60
Interesting where some people go when one mentions the strong influence of money
rhett o rick
May 2015
#66
What lie did he tell? Can you come up with the actual quote? You didn't make that up did you?
rhett o rick
May 2015
#24
bs. he re-directed a specific question about hillary into an general question about an issue
magical thyme
May 2015
#39
CU allows unlimited $ for negative ads against oppostion which the GOP excells at
ErikJ
May 2015
#26
I think pragmatism is used by people to hide behind, that are afraid to fight for their freedoms
rhett o rick
May 2015
#29
And if Sanders wins the primary and doesn't take the big money how does he win?
hrmjustin
May 2015
#9
No it won't be. They willhave tons of money and ads and Sanders won't have enough to get his message
hrmjustin
May 2015
#14
The distribution of population for the electoral college makes it simple mathematics
BrotherIvan
May 2015
#74
No, she doesn't have to take the money. But she will, and if this continues, believing there is no
sabrina 1
May 2015
#16
People power. It's time to take our government back and Sen Sanders is the person to
rhett o rick
May 2015
#32
So are you saying that Hillary does give preferential treatment to Clinton Foundation donors? nt
magical thyme
May 2015
#40
No. What I am saying is that she takes in a lot of money from donors so that she can compete.
hrmjustin
May 2015
#41
I should tell my kids that they should cheat on tests to keep up with the kids that cheat on tests..
Bonobo
May 2015
#45
Didn't say it was. It's a general message that has been been out there and here on DU.
L0oniX
May 2015
#67
Good point, a prime example is the Clinton Global Intuitive. Warren Buffett is giving his
Thinkingabout
May 2015
#15
the split is between Dems who think that money lets you win more often and then you get to do what
MisterP
May 2015
#13
We know it takes money for the candidate to advertise, travel and support a staff.
Thinkingabout
May 2015
#18
Do you think a candidate on the national level is going anywhere without traveling and
Thinkingabout
May 2015
#25
Do you think banning advertising on tv is the prime suspect? Getting Citizens
Thinkingabout
May 2015
#27
It is not verboten. It is pointless during a primary season, and in a general election,
djean111
May 2015
#55
In the unlikely event Sanders wins primary, he'll need far more than Clinton to withstand what the
Hoyt
May 2015
#31
And the consequence of his votes has been reelection and promotion for 30 years.
morningfog
May 2015
#82
But..but..Hillary is now talking about election reform. To take effect after she rakes in the cash.
Tierra_y_Libertad
May 2015
#36
The way our system currently works is that money wins the White House. Do you want Dems to retain
Metric System
May 2015
#68