Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Bernie Sanders wrote the ACA clause that allowed for VT to try single payer, but VT failed to raise [View all]diabeticman
(3,121 posts)7. WAIT? By your logic Because Bernie is the FEDERAL Senator representing Vermont and got a clause
into a NATIONAL health bill which would give his state a chance for single payer BUT because the state failed to meet the requirements it proves Bernie Sanders would not be a good President?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
200 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Bernie Sanders wrote the ACA clause that allowed for VT to try single payer, but VT failed to raise [View all]
pnwmom
May 2015
OP
Yes, if he is claiming he is a leader. If he is claiming he can affect radical changes.
stevenleser
May 2015
#4
No, the Governor didn't "ditch it as soon as he could". The Governor knew he couldn't make it
okaawhatever
May 2015
#9
The Governor gave up after years of trying to get the tax increases through the legislature.
pnwmom
May 2015
#14
Okay let's flip the question, how will Hillary pass progressive legislation in a country...
Agschmid
May 2015
#69
She's not the one claiming she can. Sanders entire reason for running is based on it. nt
stevenleser
May 2015
#153
In 24 years, why hasn't he written more bills? And why do people here lionize him as such
pnwmom
May 2015
#194
"You're trying to paint Sanders as an ineffectual idealist, and his supporters as out-of-touch...
stevenleser
May 2015
#126
He was in congress three times as long. And yet again evades the question.
stevenleser
May 2015
#136
So there is no reason for a Sanders Presidency. He can't accomplish anything. Thats your answer. nt
stevenleser
May 2015
#144
What legislation that is good for the country would Republicans support?
Bjorn Against
May 2015
#145
Nice ad hominem. Bernie is the one running on a transformative agenda. The onus is on him and his
stevenleser
May 2015
#141
I've never worked for any television network. I have been a recurring guest on several.
stevenleser
May 2015
#150
I'd rather have a very authentic and honest politician who cares about the 99%'ers.
eloydude
May 2015
#5
I think the bottom line is the person has to be able to beat the Rethugs in the general.
pnwmom
May 2015
#15
No, it's embarrassing to see people evade the real questions about what he can get done. nt
stevenleser
May 2015
#127
Yep, I've seen his legislative history. He can't say he can get done the kinds of things
stevenleser
May 2015
#11
How in the world would you expect one of the few uncorrupted politicians to be able to
stillwaiting
May 2015
#35
Electing someone President who can radically shift Americans understanding
stillwaiting
May 2015
#45
In other words, you offer wishful thinking against 24 years of Bernies inability to affect change.
stevenleser
May 2015
#112
All of the media spokespeople are sure to be saying that over the next year.
stillwaiting
May 2015
#115
Because it's an obvious question given the circumstances that Bernie will have to answer.
stevenleser
May 2015
#125
I've already addressed what good a Sanders Presidency could bring to our nation.
stillwaiting
May 2015
#130
And it's all wishful thinking that has no chance of passing either house of congress.
stevenleser
May 2015
#132
Sanders can present his vision to get people in this country to vote for people that SUPPORT
stillwaiting
May 2015
#159
"The power of the president is the power to persuade." (Richard Neustadt) Sanders will leverage
Ed Suspicious
May 2015
#191
Two differences. #1 - She's not running on a promise to remake the country in a progressive image.
stevenleser
May 2015
#13
That's correct. Her campaign would be about Liberal incrementalism. Which is the only thing possible
stevenleser
May 2015
#102
LOL-- so it's ok that Hillary's done less, because she's not trying to improve things anyway.
Marr
May 2015
#120
I'm glad for this thread and especially for this post. I don't see how in the world Sanders' action
Number23
May 2015
#37
Remember when Kucinich was the "anointed one"? Sadly, their legislative successes are on par.
Tarheel_Dem
May 2015
#85
It's just that Hillary's a serious contender for the office, Bernie is not. He just talks alot.
Tarheel_Dem
May 2015
#200
I am 100% serious when I say that I don't understand any of this really breathless, almost manic
Number23
May 2015
#171
"Significantly higher". They say it's "to push Hillary to the left", but how much of the party....
Tarheel_Dem
May 2015
#199
He's been in congress 24 years. That spin doesn't work. He's running to radically change
stevenleser
May 2015
#104
It's spin. you're making excuses for why he couldn't do much in 24 years when he is running to be
stevenleser
May 2015
#108
Thanks for your links. And you're right, passing legislation is just one bit of a Congress person's
Number23
May 2015
#174
Actually, that is the problem with the Democrats in Congress, they won't necessarily stand by the
still_one
May 2015
#109
With your outlook we will just keep getting Republican policy, just like the last 6 years.
cui bono
May 2015
#189
WAIT? By your logic Because Bernie is the FEDERAL Senator representing Vermont and got a clause
diabeticman
May 2015
#7
That's a good point. It's sad though, and I applaud Sanders for trying. But we have to be realistic
Hoyt
May 2015
#8
He helped write the law that allocated ACA money to Vermont, making single-payer possible there.
pnwmom
May 2015
#24
It seems then that this is an example of him succeeding at his job, and the state politicians
Chathamization
May 2015
#49
He did succeed to the best the overarching situation would dictate. Once state pools and oversight
TheKentuckian
May 2015
#100
Not quite Edwards wanted it to evolve into single payer. And other differences.
Snotcicles
May 2015
#182
This is a legitimate discussion and I would like to see answers better than "LOL"
leftofcool
May 2015
#27
I suspect that you would like to see answers like "Oh dear, I must switch to supporting Hillary",
djean111
May 2015
#29
So you don't want to have a serious discussion about his potential effectiveness as President.
pnwmom
May 2015
#39
That is only a "serious question" for the most ardent of Clinton supporters
DefenseLawyer
May 2015
#46
I don't have a candidate.. and it's still a weird distraction about "Bernie's hair" which I find a
Cha
May 2015
#48
Isn't Karl Frisch one of the clowns on the Stephanie Miller Democratic talking point show?
uncleverusername
May 2015
#56
Bernie was not the governor, or a part of the state legislature at the time...
Agschmid
May 2015
#42
He arranged for funding through the ACA, which gave Vermont the chance to set up
pnwmom
May 2015
#65
Government hasn't done anything significant for decades, might be nice to try something new.
Agschmid
May 2015
#67
It's a great question but I would still vote for the candidate that doesn't quit before starting. nt
Bonobo
May 2015
#66
Makes ya think about imaginary power vs. actual power. There is no magic wand. nt
Hekate
May 2015
#72
I'm curious if he did, because if so then the OP's whole line of reasoning is BS.
davidpdx
May 2015
#91
How did Hillary do with Hillarycare? How about her two anti free speech flag burning bills?
merrily
May 2015
#78
Which states are more liberal than Vermont? Hillary learned from the experience,
pnwmom
May 2015
#80
You still haven't backed up your claim. Which states are more liberal than Vermont? n/t
pnwmom
May 2015
#82
"Hillary learned from the experience". Do you know how aristocratic and gross that sounds?
Marr
May 2015
#123
Claiming someone learned from experience is a bad thing now if it's Hillary?
stevenleser
May 2015
#134
this, of course, isn't a reflection on Bernie's desire for single payer. It's more a reflection of..
wyldwolf
May 2015
#89
and of course the legislative branch is required. Some of President Obama's Democratic criticis
still_one
May 2015
#110
True. This is nothing new from that group. They think a President can govern by decree.
stevenleser
May 2015
#133
Yes, I've asked several Bernie supporters for names of GOP Senators who will vote for his agenda.
stevenleser
May 2015
#128
It is an excellent point, but regardless of Vermont, the fact was we did not have the votes to pass
still_one
May 2015
#106
The state asked for the waiver. I fail to see how the means that it was Bernie who got it. MN
jwirr
May 2015
#114
I'm not evading questions; I'm ignoring silly shit-slinging and calling out the shit-slingers.
Comrade Grumpy
May 2015
#161
there is no question to answer. Bernie does not govern vermont or sit in its legislature.
Warren Stupidity
May 2015
#184
Hillary co wrote and sponsored a bill against flag burning... it failed
Ichingcarpenter
May 2015
#147
you keep thinking you've seen how low the PUMAS will go, but it will get worse. Way worse
Doctor_J
May 2015
#173
The president knew that the states would not be able to afford SP. The ACA was designed
Doctor_J
May 2015
#172
He doesn't have to lead the country left ...the country's left will be attracted to him and...
L0oniX
May 2015
#176
Much of the country already embraces "sharp left" issues -- Bernie isn't exactly radical.
SMC22307
May 2015
#195