General Discussion

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)

22. +3

Reply to Logical (Reply #5)

Mon May 4, 2015, 03:47 PM

May 2015

That is the worst winning strategy ever. Like, ever.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

67 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hillary: No Need to Prove She’s a Populist [View all] OKNancy May 2015 OP

Populist in social issues but wrong in the economic/foreign policy eloydude May 2015 #1

What has she done exactly to "suck up" to Wall Street? OKNancy May 2015 #3

That's for you to open your mind and begin your research eloydude May 2015 #7

you made the statement. It is up to you. What votes? OKNancy May 2015 #8

DLC zipplewrath May 2015 #13

Warren moved left from the right and they happen to be rated together. Thinkingabout May 2015 #21

Which is why Hillary met with her zipplewrath May 2015 #27

You mean Warren only started moving to the left in the past few months? Thinkingabout May 2015 #28

No, the exact opposite zipplewrath May 2015 #45

You sure have your facts confused. Oh, did somebody tell you this? Thinkingabout May 2015 #46

She'll be like Peter zipplewrath May 2015 #47

K & R, good article and informative. Thinkingabout May 2015 #25

Because claiming you can raise over two BILLION dollars from corporate interests for your campaign BrotherIvan May 2015 #23

Wow, where to start. How about when she gave a speech to Goldman-Sacs rhett o rick May 2015 #33

what bills when she had the power to do so did she introduce or sponsor OKNancy May 2015 #34

I disagree. She is very friendly with Goldman-Sachs and gave them and rhett o rick May 2015 #41

you mean recently? bvar22 May 2015 #38

A real populist would turn down donations from billionaires. There is always the assumption rhett o rick May 2015 #42

No kidding! nt darkangel218 May 2015 #9

Welcome to DU... SidDithers May 2015 #24

Links for proof please! leftofcool May 2015 #29

She doesn't "suck up to wall street". DCBob May 2015 #61

K&R! hrmjustin May 2015 #2

This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words May 2015 #4

Oh FFS! Nt Logical May 2015 #5

+1 AtomicKitten May 2015 #11

+2 darkangel218 May 2015 #15

+3 BrotherIvan May 2015 #22

DU rec...nt SidDithers May 2015 #6

First female president... yallerdawg May 2015 #10

LOL, So you will be happy with Fiorina???? Nt Logical May 2015 #20

Like how Margaret Thatcher ushered in a progressive era? Your notion is absurd. TheKentuckian May 2015 #40

I believe supporting Hillary... yallerdawg May 2015 #44

I can and have supported many TM99 May 2015 #53

Nikki Haley is the Governor of South Carolina, a liberal man would be far more progressive. TheKentuckian May 2015 #64

Great article KMOD May 2015 #12

Marian Wright Edelman and her husband publicly fell out with the Clintons Dems to Win May 2015 #14

and mended fences shortly thereafter. KMOD May 2015 #19

If the article's claim was true, it would be easy to have a laundry list jeff47 May 2015 #16

but she did introduce many bills OKNancy May 2015 #18

Not according to your own lists jeff47 May 2015 #26

There is a list of over 400 bills she has sponsored on the gov track site leftofcool May 2015 #31

Golly, if only I had explicitly addressed that when I replied. jeff47 May 2015 #66

read again OKNancy May 2015 #32

Again, the claim in the OP is she is such a populist we don't even need to look at her record. jeff47 May 2015 #67

i have followed Bill since 1980 but had not spent much time looking at Hillary's record and Thinkingabout May 2015 #17

K&R leftofcool May 2015 #30

Those claiming she is a populist ignore the fact that she is expected to raise rhett o rick May 2015 #35

So? Fight fire with fire... I give $5.00 a month OKNancy May 2015 #36

The point is that big money wants her to win. They are willing to prove it with rhett o rick May 2015 #37

Big money wants the republicans to win. Agschmid May 2015 #48

I understand. But the claim by this OP is that HRC is a Populist. That's not true. rhett o rick May 2015 #50

It's not chicken feed, but if you want Berie to win he is going to have to raise some money as well. Agschmid May 2015 #51

I am disappointed. You know that Sen Sanders can't raise the amount of money that rhett o rick May 2015 #52

No I understand, and I did not make the claim that she was a populist. Agschmid May 2015 #54

It's important that we fight on in spite of those saying we cant win. Clearly it will be an up hill rhett o rick May 2015 #56

If she had no need to prove she's a populist, she wouldn't have "reintroduced" herself winter is coming May 2015 #39

How does she stand up as a populist on issues like Fracking, the TPP, the Patriot Act, rhett o rick May 2015 #43

Good.. I have no reason not to believe Martin Dickinson.. Cha May 2015 #49

It would be impossible; she's not that good an actress. AtomicKitten May 2015 #55

I agree, since she's not. InAbLuEsTaTe May 2015 #57

LOL. woo me with science May 2015 #58

Ok... sendero May 2015 #59

Helping poor children doesn't count BainsBane May 2015 #60

She needs to fulminate against the Clintons and dog whistle about the TPP. ucrdem May 2015 #63

Clinton doesn't need to prove anything, we should take her at her own word and all davidpdx May 2015 #62

There is no need for HRC to prove that she is a liberal Gothmog May 2015 #65