Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)

1. Great post KittyWampus

Reply to KittyWampus (Original post)

Mon May 4, 2015, 07:00 PM

May 2015

So many names come to mind:
Stephane Charbonnier,
Sarah Palin,
Pat Robertson,
Oral Roberts,
Rush Limbaugh,
Dick Cheney,
Pamela Geller,

and so many more.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Stochastic Terrorism- Triggering The Shooters. [View all] KittyWampus May 2015 OP

Great post KittyWampus guillaumeb May 2015 #1

pop psychology at it's worst. Mosby May 2015 #2

how so? . . . .n/t annabanana May 2015 #4

because its a "fancy pants" way to claim that the perp was provoked or incited. Mosby May 2015 #5

Not only that, and there might be something to it nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #8

Actually, it's more like crowd-sourced psychology. But, the theory is intuitively appealing. leveymg May 2015 #7

Interesting stuff. . . .n/t annabanana May 2015 #9

Can you direct me to case law on this nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #3

I don't there's any chance to use the concept in establishing legal culpability. KittyWampus May 2015 #10

We might find ourselves there sooner or later. nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #12

The Universe would still be orbiting Earth if we allowed the dumb fucks to run the show seveneyes May 2015 #6

And the "solution" would be what, in accordance with our Constitution and laws? WinkyDink May 2015 #11