General Discussion

TheKentuckian

(26,314 posts)

64. Nikki Haley is the Governor of South Carolina, a liberal man would be far more progressive.

Tue May 5, 2015, 06:08 AM

May 2015

Do you contend that Iowa is more progressive with Breadbags Ernst than it was with Tom Harkin?

You argument is stupid, minds are progressive not sex organs.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

67 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hillary: No Need to Prove She’s a Populist [View all] OKNancy May 2015 OP

Populist in social issues but wrong in the economic/foreign policy eloydude May 2015 #1

What has she done exactly to "suck up" to Wall Street? OKNancy May 2015 #3

That's for you to open your mind and begin your research eloydude May 2015 #7

you made the statement. It is up to you. What votes? OKNancy May 2015 #8

DLC zipplewrath May 2015 #13

Warren moved left from the right and they happen to be rated together. Thinkingabout May 2015 #21

Which is why Hillary met with her zipplewrath May 2015 #27

You mean Warren only started moving to the left in the past few months? Thinkingabout May 2015 #28

No, the exact opposite zipplewrath May 2015 #45

You sure have your facts confused. Oh, did somebody tell you this? Thinkingabout May 2015 #46

She'll be like Peter zipplewrath May 2015 #47

K & R, good article and informative. Thinkingabout May 2015 #25

Because claiming you can raise over two BILLION dollars from corporate interests for your campaign BrotherIvan May 2015 #23

Wow, where to start. How about when she gave a speech to Goldman-Sacs rhett o rick May 2015 #33

what bills when she had the power to do so did she introduce or sponsor OKNancy May 2015 #34

I disagree. She is very friendly with Goldman-Sachs and gave them and rhett o rick May 2015 #41

you mean recently? bvar22 May 2015 #38

A real populist would turn down donations from billionaires. There is always the assumption rhett o rick May 2015 #42

No kidding! nt darkangel218 May 2015 #9

Welcome to DU... SidDithers May 2015 #24

Links for proof please! leftofcool May 2015 #29

She doesn't "suck up to wall street". DCBob May 2015 #61

K&R! hrmjustin May 2015 #2

This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words May 2015 #4

Oh FFS! Nt Logical May 2015 #5

+1 AtomicKitten May 2015 #11

+2 darkangel218 May 2015 #15

+3 BrotherIvan May 2015 #22

DU rec...nt SidDithers May 2015 #6

First female president... yallerdawg May 2015 #10

LOL, So you will be happy with Fiorina???? Nt Logical May 2015 #20

Like how Margaret Thatcher ushered in a progressive era? Your notion is absurd. TheKentuckian May 2015 #40

I believe supporting Hillary... yallerdawg May 2015 #44

I can and have supported many TM99 May 2015 #53

Nikki Haley is the Governor of South Carolina, a liberal man would be far more progressive. TheKentuckian May 2015 #64

Great article KMOD May 2015 #12

Marian Wright Edelman and her husband publicly fell out with the Clintons Dems to Win May 2015 #14

and mended fences shortly thereafter. KMOD May 2015 #19

If the article's claim was true, it would be easy to have a laundry list jeff47 May 2015 #16

but she did introduce many bills OKNancy May 2015 #18

Not according to your own lists jeff47 May 2015 #26

There is a list of over 400 bills she has sponsored on the gov track site leftofcool May 2015 #31

Golly, if only I had explicitly addressed that when I replied. jeff47 May 2015 #66

read again OKNancy May 2015 #32

Again, the claim in the OP is she is such a populist we don't even need to look at her record. jeff47 May 2015 #67

i have followed Bill since 1980 but had not spent much time looking at Hillary's record and Thinkingabout May 2015 #17

K&R leftofcool May 2015 #30

Those claiming she is a populist ignore the fact that she is expected to raise rhett o rick May 2015 #35

So? Fight fire with fire... I give $5.00 a month OKNancy May 2015 #36

The point is that big money wants her to win. They are willing to prove it with rhett o rick May 2015 #37

Big money wants the republicans to win. Agschmid May 2015 #48

I understand. But the claim by this OP is that HRC is a Populist. That's not true. rhett o rick May 2015 #50

It's not chicken feed, but if you want Berie to win he is going to have to raise some money as well. Agschmid May 2015 #51

I am disappointed. You know that Sen Sanders can't raise the amount of money that rhett o rick May 2015 #52

No I understand, and I did not make the claim that she was a populist. Agschmid May 2015 #54

It's important that we fight on in spite of those saying we cant win. Clearly it will be an up hill rhett o rick May 2015 #56

If she had no need to prove she's a populist, she wouldn't have "reintroduced" herself winter is coming May 2015 #39

How does she stand up as a populist on issues like Fracking, the TPP, the Patriot Act, rhett o rick May 2015 #43

Good.. I have no reason not to believe Martin Dickinson.. Cha May 2015 #49

It would be impossible; she's not that good an actress. AtomicKitten May 2015 #55

I agree, since she's not. InAbLuEsTaTe May 2015 #57

LOL. woo me with science May 2015 #58

Ok... sendero May 2015 #59

Helping poor children doesn't count BainsBane May 2015 #60

She needs to fulminate against the Clintons and dog whistle about the TPP. ucrdem May 2015 #63

Clinton doesn't need to prove anything, we should take her at her own word and all davidpdx May 2015 #62

There is no need for HRC to prove that she is a liberal Gothmog May 2015 #65