Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Bernie Sanders wrote the ACA clause that allowed for VT to try single payer, but VT failed to raise [View all]stevenleser
(32,886 posts)112. In other words, you offer wishful thinking against 24 years of Bernies inability to affect change.
It doesn't work.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
200 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Bernie Sanders wrote the ACA clause that allowed for VT to try single payer, but VT failed to raise [View all]
pnwmom
May 2015
OP
Yes, if he is claiming he is a leader. If he is claiming he can affect radical changes.
stevenleser
May 2015
#4
No, the Governor didn't "ditch it as soon as he could". The Governor knew he couldn't make it
okaawhatever
May 2015
#9
The Governor gave up after years of trying to get the tax increases through the legislature.
pnwmom
May 2015
#14
Okay let's flip the question, how will Hillary pass progressive legislation in a country...
Agschmid
May 2015
#69
She's not the one claiming she can. Sanders entire reason for running is based on it. nt
stevenleser
May 2015
#153
In 24 years, why hasn't he written more bills? And why do people here lionize him as such
pnwmom
May 2015
#194
"You're trying to paint Sanders as an ineffectual idealist, and his supporters as out-of-touch...
stevenleser
May 2015
#126
He was in congress three times as long. And yet again evades the question.
stevenleser
May 2015
#136
So there is no reason for a Sanders Presidency. He can't accomplish anything. Thats your answer. nt
stevenleser
May 2015
#144
What legislation that is good for the country would Republicans support?
Bjorn Against
May 2015
#145
Nice ad hominem. Bernie is the one running on a transformative agenda. The onus is on him and his
stevenleser
May 2015
#141
I've never worked for any television network. I have been a recurring guest on several.
stevenleser
May 2015
#150
I'd rather have a very authentic and honest politician who cares about the 99%'ers.
eloydude
May 2015
#5
I think the bottom line is the person has to be able to beat the Rethugs in the general.
pnwmom
May 2015
#15
No, it's embarrassing to see people evade the real questions about what he can get done. nt
stevenleser
May 2015
#127
Yep, I've seen his legislative history. He can't say he can get done the kinds of things
stevenleser
May 2015
#11
How in the world would you expect one of the few uncorrupted politicians to be able to
stillwaiting
May 2015
#35
Electing someone President who can radically shift Americans understanding
stillwaiting
May 2015
#45
In other words, you offer wishful thinking against 24 years of Bernies inability to affect change.
stevenleser
May 2015
#112
All of the media spokespeople are sure to be saying that over the next year.
stillwaiting
May 2015
#115
Because it's an obvious question given the circumstances that Bernie will have to answer.
stevenleser
May 2015
#125
I've already addressed what good a Sanders Presidency could bring to our nation.
stillwaiting
May 2015
#130
And it's all wishful thinking that has no chance of passing either house of congress.
stevenleser
May 2015
#132
Sanders can present his vision to get people in this country to vote for people that SUPPORT
stillwaiting
May 2015
#159
"The power of the president is the power to persuade." (Richard Neustadt) Sanders will leverage
Ed Suspicious
May 2015
#191
Two differences. #1 - She's not running on a promise to remake the country in a progressive image.
stevenleser
May 2015
#13
That's correct. Her campaign would be about Liberal incrementalism. Which is the only thing possible
stevenleser
May 2015
#102
LOL-- so it's ok that Hillary's done less, because she's not trying to improve things anyway.
Marr
May 2015
#120
I'm glad for this thread and especially for this post. I don't see how in the world Sanders' action
Number23
May 2015
#37
Remember when Kucinich was the "anointed one"? Sadly, their legislative successes are on par.
Tarheel_Dem
May 2015
#85
It's just that Hillary's a serious contender for the office, Bernie is not. He just talks alot.
Tarheel_Dem
May 2015
#200
I am 100% serious when I say that I don't understand any of this really breathless, almost manic
Number23
May 2015
#171
"Significantly higher". They say it's "to push Hillary to the left", but how much of the party....
Tarheel_Dem
May 2015
#199
He's been in congress 24 years. That spin doesn't work. He's running to radically change
stevenleser
May 2015
#104
It's spin. you're making excuses for why he couldn't do much in 24 years when he is running to be
stevenleser
May 2015
#108
Thanks for your links. And you're right, passing legislation is just one bit of a Congress person's
Number23
May 2015
#174
Actually, that is the problem with the Democrats in Congress, they won't necessarily stand by the
still_one
May 2015
#109
With your outlook we will just keep getting Republican policy, just like the last 6 years.
cui bono
May 2015
#189
WAIT? By your logic Because Bernie is the FEDERAL Senator representing Vermont and got a clause
diabeticman
May 2015
#7
That's a good point. It's sad though, and I applaud Sanders for trying. But we have to be realistic
Hoyt
May 2015
#8
He helped write the law that allocated ACA money to Vermont, making single-payer possible there.
pnwmom
May 2015
#24
It seems then that this is an example of him succeeding at his job, and the state politicians
Chathamization
May 2015
#49
He did succeed to the best the overarching situation would dictate. Once state pools and oversight
TheKentuckian
May 2015
#100
Not quite Edwards wanted it to evolve into single payer. And other differences.
Snotcicles
May 2015
#182
This is a legitimate discussion and I would like to see answers better than "LOL"
leftofcool
May 2015
#27
I suspect that you would like to see answers like "Oh dear, I must switch to supporting Hillary",
djean111
May 2015
#29
So you don't want to have a serious discussion about his potential effectiveness as President.
pnwmom
May 2015
#39
That is only a "serious question" for the most ardent of Clinton supporters
DefenseLawyer
May 2015
#46
I don't have a candidate.. and it's still a weird distraction about "Bernie's hair" which I find a
Cha
May 2015
#48
Isn't Karl Frisch one of the clowns on the Stephanie Miller Democratic talking point show?
uncleverusername
May 2015
#56
Bernie was not the governor, or a part of the state legislature at the time...
Agschmid
May 2015
#42
He arranged for funding through the ACA, which gave Vermont the chance to set up
pnwmom
May 2015
#65
Government hasn't done anything significant for decades, might be nice to try something new.
Agschmid
May 2015
#67
It's a great question but I would still vote for the candidate that doesn't quit before starting. nt
Bonobo
May 2015
#66
Makes ya think about imaginary power vs. actual power. There is no magic wand. nt
Hekate
May 2015
#72
I'm curious if he did, because if so then the OP's whole line of reasoning is BS.
davidpdx
May 2015
#91
How did Hillary do with Hillarycare? How about her two anti free speech flag burning bills?
merrily
May 2015
#78
Which states are more liberal than Vermont? Hillary learned from the experience,
pnwmom
May 2015
#80
You still haven't backed up your claim. Which states are more liberal than Vermont? n/t
pnwmom
May 2015
#82
"Hillary learned from the experience". Do you know how aristocratic and gross that sounds?
Marr
May 2015
#123
Claiming someone learned from experience is a bad thing now if it's Hillary?
stevenleser
May 2015
#134
this, of course, isn't a reflection on Bernie's desire for single payer. It's more a reflection of..
wyldwolf
May 2015
#89
and of course the legislative branch is required. Some of President Obama's Democratic criticis
still_one
May 2015
#110
True. This is nothing new from that group. They think a President can govern by decree.
stevenleser
May 2015
#133
Yes, I've asked several Bernie supporters for names of GOP Senators who will vote for his agenda.
stevenleser
May 2015
#128
It is an excellent point, but regardless of Vermont, the fact was we did not have the votes to pass
still_one
May 2015
#106
The state asked for the waiver. I fail to see how the means that it was Bernie who got it. MN
jwirr
May 2015
#114
I'm not evading questions; I'm ignoring silly shit-slinging and calling out the shit-slingers.
Comrade Grumpy
May 2015
#161
there is no question to answer. Bernie does not govern vermont or sit in its legislature.
Warren Stupidity
May 2015
#184
Hillary co wrote and sponsored a bill against flag burning... it failed
Ichingcarpenter
May 2015
#147
you keep thinking you've seen how low the PUMAS will go, but it will get worse. Way worse
Doctor_J
May 2015
#173
The president knew that the states would not be able to afford SP. The ACA was designed
Doctor_J
May 2015
#172
He doesn't have to lead the country left ...the country's left will be attracted to him and...
L0oniX
May 2015
#176
Much of the country already embraces "sharp left" issues -- Bernie isn't exactly radical.
SMC22307
May 2015
#195