Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Fukushima Report Delayed as TEPCO Gets New Chance to Explain [View all]FBaggins
(28,718 posts)14. Nope... I merely claimed that active fission ended years ago
Where's your source, FBaggins?
More than four years of posting on this stuff and still don't get even the basics of how a reactor works? That's stunning.
What's the source? Basic inalterable laws of physics... that's the source.
When a reactor is active, the fission reaction creates more than just heat for boiling water. It creates lots of other elements ("fission products"
, many of which are radioactive. Those elements give off heat as they decay (adding to the total heat) and many of their decay daughter products are also radioactive (giving off even more heat).
Once the reactor has been running for awhile, the active fission makes up only ~90% of the total heat that the reactor produces (IIRC). The other 10% is from the decay of other elements. Some of them have very long half-lives (and thus have low activity and put out little of that heat)... and some have much shorter half-lives (and thus have much higher activity levels and coincident heat production).
Once the reactor is turned off, fission stops almost instantaneously - but the reactor is still producing 10% of the amount of heat from when it was active. This drops off fairly quickly as those short-half-life elements disappear. Within the hour (about when backup power was cut off) it's down to just a couple percent of the initial heat. Then the decline slows.
Now... I'm sure that you remember most of that... but you're missing what it means. The largest bq-counts of the Fukushima release are never really counted, because they're "noble gases" that are lighter than air and have incredibly short half-lives. Nobody "counts" them because they couldn't impact anyone and were quickly gone. The largest bq release that people pay attention to was the radioiodine with its 8-day half-life (and most common health impact). It took a couple months for that to disappear entirely.
Those elements die off because they are produced by the fission and their levels rise in a reactor until the amount dying off (half every eight days) equals the amount being created in the active reaction. When the fission stops, they aren't produced any longer and start to disappear. But the point is that it's gone.
Here's the point to pay attention to. If you can't detect those elements... then there isn't any fission going on. You can't have fission without creating the fission products that go along with it. It isn't physically possible.
Radioiodine is incredibly easy to detect/identify and impossible to hide. None has been found for almost four years... and therefore there has been no active fission since the reactors shut down as the earthquake struck. Q.E.D.
More than four years of posting on this stuff and still don't get even the basics of how a reactor works? That's stunning.
What's the source? Basic inalterable laws of physics... that's the source.
When a reactor is active, the fission reaction creates more than just heat for boiling water. It creates lots of other elements ("fission products"
Once the reactor has been running for awhile, the active fission makes up only ~90% of the total heat that the reactor produces (IIRC). The other 10% is from the decay of other elements. Some of them have very long half-lives (and thus have low activity and put out little of that heat)... and some have much shorter half-lives (and thus have much higher activity levels and coincident heat production).
Once the reactor is turned off, fission stops almost instantaneously - but the reactor is still producing 10% of the amount of heat from when it was active. This drops off fairly quickly as those short-half-life elements disappear. Within the hour (about when backup power was cut off) it's down to just a couple percent of the initial heat. Then the decline slows.
Now... I'm sure that you remember most of that... but you're missing what it means. The largest bq-counts of the Fukushima release are never really counted, because they're "noble gases" that are lighter than air and have incredibly short half-lives. Nobody "counts" them because they couldn't impact anyone and were quickly gone. The largest bq release that people pay attention to was the radioiodine with its 8-day half-life (and most common health impact). It took a couple months for that to disappear entirely.
Those elements die off because they are produced by the fission and their levels rise in a reactor until the amount dying off (half every eight days) equals the amount being created in the active reaction. When the fission stops, they aren't produced any longer and start to disappear. But the point is that it's gone.
Here's the point to pay attention to. If you can't detect those elements... then there isn't any fission going on. You can't have fission without creating the fission products that go along with it. It isn't physically possible.
Radioiodine is incredibly easy to detect/identify and impossible to hide. None has been found for almost four years... and therefore there has been no active fission since the reactors shut down as the earthquake struck. Q.E.D.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
89 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'm sure they will have a good li, er, explanation for it all. Smile and leave the bananas alone.
Mnemosyne
May 2015
#2
Who should we believe, real investigative reporters and experts who warned about the danger, or Big
sabrina 1
May 2015
#49
You know a whole lot more about what Alex Jones has to say than I do. Greg Palast
sabrina 1
May 2015
#51
When ridicule is all you have, that's not much of an argument. Here, learn something:
Octafish
May 2015
#20
You should post that as an OP, so we can see who wins the "rightness" popularity contest.
Orrex
May 2015
#47
That top picture on the left side, MY HAT, that is where the fucking thing is! Where was that taken
snooper2
May 2015
#77
Fukushima’s “Caldrons of Hell”: More than 300 Tons of Highly Radioactive Water Generated Daily
Ichingcarpenter
May 2015
#17