Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Capt. Obvious

(9,002 posts) Wed May 6, 2015, 09:05 AM May 2015

We currently have 47 Dems to choose from for 2016 [View all]

I can see now why the Clinton machine is rigging the game.

I wouldn't want to debate James "Titus The Great" Law either. Ronald Satish Emrit would be a tough opponent too with the full backing of the United Emrits Of America Comittee.

Here is the full list of official Presidential candidates: http://www.fec.gov/press/resources/2016presidential_form2pty.shtml

I'm glad to see that Lee Mercer Jr. hasn't given up on his dream (all three).

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

We currently have 47 Dems to choose from for 2016 [View all] Capt. Obvious May 2015 OP

But we should have 30 debates with all 47 candidates, anything else is rigging by the DNC!!!11!!11!! stevenleser May 2015 #1

Is there any interest in starting KMOD May 2015 #2

... NuclearDem May 2015 #4

You'll have to fight the James "Titus the Great" Law group! muriel_volestrangler May 2015 #7

There is this one that's already started up: freshwest May 2015 #9

So What You Are Saying Is.... global1 May 2015 #3

hate to break this to you but it's usually that way cali May 2015 #5

+1 Marr May 2015 #6

And if we did, most of the same folks would complain about that too. They have before. nt stevenleser May 2015 #8

And there were 47 signers on the Iran letter. Coincidence? pinboy3niner May 2015 #10