General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Fukushima Report Delayed as TEPCO Gets New Chance to Explain [View all]FBaggins
(28,772 posts)For instance... would "You know a whole lot more about what Alex Jones has to say than I do." be a smear?
How about the claim that those who disagree are believing "big corporations who profit from all of this"... rather than... oh, I don't know... actual experts in health physics and global/governmental specialists?
Why associate a DUer with what someone not even in the conversation said?
The key in this case is to get her to understand the real value (or lack thereof) of the sources that she's relying on. There are legitimate reasons to oppose nuclear power and there are reasonable people who do so... then there's a whole spectrum from there to the lunatic fringe. It helps to be able to recognize that fringe and how firmly they stick together. Pallast is not a valuable source when considering Fukushima... he really hasn't added anything of value... he just parrots that fringe.