Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: it's simple. if gun control is a vitally important issue to you [View all]JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)60. Please ...
... the reason ANYONE says an issue is not so important for them, is to suggest that others see it the same way.
Now ... let's pretend ... Bernie wins the nomination ... and then GASP ... takes corporate money.
I'm sure you will be the first to attack him ... ooops, no ... you, and many others will say its OK because he'd have to do it to win (which would be true).
I could be wrong, maybe he won't take it. And he'd lose, no?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
120 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Same for Howard Dean - both probably because of the states they represented.
AtomicKitten
May 2015
#2
Upstate NY is the same. Rural areas are different from other parts of the country. No one will win
sabrina 1
May 2015
#114
+1; Background checks is something most Americans overwhelmingly support though.
stillwaiting
May 2015
#72
It's his constituency. They are rural and they hunt. Just like Hillary is from NY where Wall St. is.
KittyWampus
May 2015
#12
Since his vote was to shield the gun manufactors and there isn't any manufactures in
Thinkingabout
May 2015
#80
Perhaps it's the principle. You know, occasionally, a politician does actually abide by principle.
X_Digger
May 2015
#110
Deal breaker even in the absence of an explanation of his reasoning?
cherokeeprogressive
May 2015
#73
Gun ownership as a percent of population is far higher where I live than any city
Travis_0004
May 2015
#106
He might not take money from gun manufacturers but it's too bad he protects them. THAT SAID-
KittyWampus
May 2015
#10
There is an extensive history of plaintiffs' attorneys sueing firearms manufacturers...
Eleanors38
May 2015
#68
It shouldn't surprise people that Bernie is a good defender of all civil liberties.
aikoaiko
May 2015
#16
That's great. You don't live in an area with a gun violence problem, so gun control isn't a big
DanTex
May 2015
#19
But it's heroic to submit break up the banks legislation that's "nigh on impossible to pass?"
stevenleser
May 2015
#33
Of course not. The second amendment has nothing to do with civilian gun control, and never did
DanTex
May 2015
#36
And they would be wrong. Any half-decent historian knows that it was always about militias.
DanTex
May 2015
#67
I think someone who votes to provide access to mental health treatment is going to do more to lower
Township75
May 2015
#20
People with mental health issues are only as likely as the rest of the population to be violent.
Neoma
May 2015
#91
For the first time since April 11th. Well, welcome to DU. And welcome back.
KittyWampus
May 2015
#30
He's wrong on gun control and voting for weapons systems. But there is a reason why he does
NoJusticeNoPeace
May 2015
#27
I didn't miss the point. You didn't make one,other than it bothers you to see a President picked on
Autumn
May 2015
#75
" DU will turn on ANY Dem President who does not have an iron clad filibuster proof majority."
pasto76
May 2015
#82
I would politely disagree. Bernie supports gun regulations. He has an F rating from the NRA.
Cheese Sandwich
May 2015
#52
That is a feature not a bug for me, just means he aligns even closer to my beliefs.
TheKentuckian
May 2015
#71