Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

starroute

(12,977 posts)
19. Pipelines threaten to destroy pristine rural areas
Wed May 6, 2015, 05:32 PM
May 2015

They have the potential to contaminate water supplies on which major cities depend. Even the coating on the outside of the pipes intended to keep them corroding can release toxins into the water supply.

They disrupt wildlife migration routes.

Once they go through a farm, the soil above them becomes unfarmable.

They run across steep slopes, causing destructive erosion, and across streams and rivers, putting fish at risk. They are a threat to the tourism and recreation on which many rural areas depend without supplying any local economic benefits in exchange.

Even land that taxpayers have paid to protect from development is open to being seized through eminent domain.

The construction companies that promise landowners to put things back almost exactly the way they were often leave destruction and polluted wells in their wake.

And where there aren't enough rural areas lined up in a row, they plow through shopping centers and suburban backyards.

"Rural areas" is not a synonym for "nobody gives a damn."

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

So I guess Heimdal is German for Lac-Megantic KamaAina May 2015 #1
I don't know about that. MineralMan May 2015 #3
One of those puppies exploded in downtown Lac-Megantic, Quebec a couple of years ago KamaAina May 2015 #7
Yes, I know about that. MineralMan May 2015 #9
CSX goes over a very old single track overpass 1/2 mile from our house. dixiegrrrrl May 2015 #11
Yes. Those trains are everywhere. MineralMan May 2015 #12
So without a pipeline B2G May 2015 #2
An excellent question, indeed. MineralMan May 2015 #4
There are risks with any transport method B2G May 2015 #5
Yes. The oil will move. MineralMan May 2015 #6
Totally agree. nt B2G May 2015 #8
Pipelines threaten to destroy pristine rural areas starroute May 2015 #19
Who's debating whether or not to transport? JaneyVee May 2015 #16
The same people complaining about the pipeline B2G May 2015 #17
If you get your fucking pipeline is transportation by rail going to be banned? TheKentuckian May 2015 #20
And that's the sad truth malaise May 2015 #15
Yes. It would be far better if this oil was not needed. MineralMan May 2015 #21
Pam Geller just called herself a victim of this accident. nt Tommy_Carcetti May 2015 #10
Asher Heimermann has set up a fund to help the community recover pinboy3niner May 2015 #13
Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton are going to have a debate in front of the burning wreckage. nt Tommy_Carcetti May 2015 #14
As far as I understood this from several sadoldgirl May 2015 #18
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Breaking: Another Oil Tra...»Reply #19