Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Baltimore Cop Admits Police Plotting to Depose Mayor After Having to “Stand Down” to the “Animals” [View all]KamaAina
(78,249 posts)29. Late last year.
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/politics/bs-md-ci-vetoes-20141201-story.html
Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake carried out her promise and vetoed bills Monday that would have barred most merchants from distributing plastic bags and required Baltimore police to wear body cameras.
The City Council is expected to formally receive the vetoes during a meeting Thursday. Supporters of the legislation have acknowledged they don't have enough votes to override them. The votes of 12 of the council's 15 members are needed to override a veto.
In a letter to the council, Rawlings-Blake said she supports having police wear body cameras but opposes the legislation, in part, she argues, because the council does not have the authority to impose the requirement.
"The council's power does not and should not extend to legislating the operations of the police department," she wrote. "I would be equally as concerned with an ordinance that mandated the use of a specific type of bullet."
The City Council is expected to formally receive the vetoes during a meeting Thursday. Supporters of the legislation have acknowledged they don't have enough votes to override them. The votes of 12 of the council's 15 members are needed to override a veto.
In a letter to the council, Rawlings-Blake said she supports having police wear body cameras but opposes the legislation, in part, she argues, because the council does not have the authority to impose the requirement.
"The council's power does not and should not extend to legislating the operations of the police department," she wrote. "I would be equally as concerned with an ordinance that mandated the use of a specific type of bullet."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
51 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Baltimore Cop Admits Police Plotting to Depose Mayor After Having to “Stand Down” to the “Animals” [View all]
KamaAina
May 2015
OP
50 citizens isn't a large start towards a recall, and I suspect their attitude won't go far . . .
Journeyman
May 2015
#1
Citizens? Apparently a large number of the Baltimore PD aren't even Marylanders
Scootaloo
May 2015
#17
That will certainly make it more difficulty for them to mount a recall campaign. . .
Journeyman
May 2015
#39
Oh I get it. The implication is if one is bad, the way things are playing out now, it's safe to
Ed Suspicious
May 2015
#25
That was very disturbing clear back then. We really must get a handle on corruption.
Enthusiast
May 2015
#48
Pobrecita. Should have chosen a different line of work. Somebody throws something at you and you
Ed Suspicious
May 2015
#10
Maybe this is the kind of situation that lead to the Mayor inviting the feds in to investigate?
Ford_Prefect
May 2015
#41