General Discussion

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)

26. It does concern me, unfortunately there is not a candidate that does not have some bad positions

Wed May 6, 2015, 10:57 PM

May 2015

Last edited Wed May 6, 2015, 11:29 PM - Edit history (1)

I support Sanders, but I do not support his position on guns, if he were to get elected President this is an issue I would protest him on. I love Sanders on most issues aside from guns and Israel/Palestine so I will support his bid for the Presidency, but no matter who takes office after the election their feet need to be held to the fire.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

71 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Voting against the Brady Bill versus voting for the Iraq War Resolution? [View all] Nye Bevan May 2015 OP

Your post proves nothing Renew Deal May 2015 #1

Voting against the Brady Bill ... Evergreen Emerald May 2015 #2

Absolutely true BainsBane May 2015 #4

Guns kill more people every year. JaneyVee May 2015 #61

Not just the Brady bill BainsBane May 2015 #3

He voted for the PLCAA because he knows that holding a manufacturer liable for GGJohn May 2015 #6

Good post. bigwillq May 2015 #7

There would be no need for a separate law for that BainsBane May 2015 #10

Oh? And what firearms manufacturers delivered weapons to illegal gun runners? GGJohn May 2015 #11

Manufacturers know purchasers will take care of that. Manufacturers know guns will be misused, Hoyt May 2015 #34

Oh really? GGJohn May 2015 #37

If you made a living off something that hurt so many people, would you keep doing it? Hoyt May 2015 #41

Oh, so that would apply to the auto industry also, GGJohn May 2015 #48

Nope, cars aren't built to kill. Do you have three garages full of cars? Hoyt May 2015 #50

Oh, so you're not just as injured or dead because a car wasn't built for killing? GGJohn May 2015 #51

" People go on about Americans being killed with drones..." beevul May 2015 #55

What was the bill going to do? treestar May 2015 #60

No they are not dsc May 2015 #65

Exempts them from their own negligence? treestar May 2015 #67

As disturbing as your statistic is there is no form of gun violence worse than war Bjorn Against May 2015 #13

That may be BainsBane May 2015 #21

It does concern me, unfortunately there is not a candidate that does not have some bad positions Bjorn Against May 2015 #26

I am too, though I still agree with him more than anyone else out there. arcane1 May 2015 #31

Absolutely BainsBane May 2015 #44

You're disappointed in the same way I'm disappointed at the lack of vegemite cheesecake Scootaloo May 2015 #35

What? BainsBane May 2015 #42

My apologies, BainsBane, I actually had you mixed up with someone else, somehow Scootaloo May 2015 #53

Though it also includes the Civil War BainsBane May 2015 #22

Even so, when you count the Iraqis and Vietnamese killed the number of war deaths is astronomical Bjorn Against May 2015 #29

I understand BainsBane May 2015 #45

Anyone who opposes guns should have opposed the Iraq War Bjorn Against May 2015 #5

There are lots of lives dying in the US from guns, how can any one defend one vote over the other Thinkingabout May 2015 #33

Both votes were wrong, but their effects were not equal Bjorn Against May 2015 #39

You are right both votes may be wrong, for the number of poster claiming they would never Thinkingabout May 2015 #59

This message was self-deleted by its author guillaumeb May 2015 #8

"he opposed the bill because he felt handgun waiting periods could be dealt with at the state level" arcane1 May 2015 #32

no contest PowerToThePeople May 2015 #9

Are you suggesting that Sen. Sanders is a war criminal? eom. GGJohn May 2015 #12

you people.. PowerToThePeople May 2015 #14

Ok, sorry. GGJohn May 2015 #17

sorry if I came across badly PowerToThePeople May 2015 #19

No problem, GGJohn May 2015 #20

Voting NO on the ISIS resolution was not a good vote either. People are still getting killed. Thinkingabout May 2015 #36

So domestic war, no problem? BainsBane May 2015 #23

That's the problem, GGJohn May 2015 #24

Amen to that. n/t 99Forever May 2015 #27

I understand people have differing opinions BainsBane May 2015 #47

Ban all Guns! PowerToThePeople May 2015 #30

The gun lobby is working to overturn local and state restrictions BainsBane May 2015 #49

And "domestic war", to use your phrase, guillaumeb May 2015 #38

excellent point BainsBane May 2015 #46

I ckecked out the Senator's main contributors. guillaumeb May 2015 #69

I think it's forty something percent of Americans who own guns BainsBane May 2015 #70

Neither one are in my top issues for a candidate. n/t tammywammy May 2015 #15

I can despise both just as much, and neither candidate gets a pass. NuclearDem May 2015 #16

Ever notice how the very same folks... 99Forever May 2015 #18

It's a DU rule. n/t cherokeeprogressive May 2015 #25

To the average voter? Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2015 #28

Standard reply, followed by snarky ending. Rex May 2015 #40

Let's see a good vote I support versus one of the most foolish ones ever that I don't? TheKentuckian May 2015 #43

Gee, let's see.... MADem May 2015 #52

False equivalent Gman May 2015 #54

Since Brady around a quarter of a million people have been murdered.* joshcryer May 2015 #56

The excuses are appalling treestar May 2015 #57

false. and don't put that in the past tense. They're still dying and it's due cali May 2015 #58

Yep. I've already said I think the way folks characterize Dems votes for IWR is revisionist history stevenleser May 2015 #62

Wrong LittleBlue May 2015 #68

I honestly believe any attempt to justify the Iraq war is kind of appalling. bullwinkle428 May 2015 #71

The bottom line is: no candidate is going to have a perfect track record. cyberswede May 2015 #63

People write sane stuff, and sane stuff gets ignored in favor of the sexy stuff. ScreamingMeemie May 2015 #64

But but but...ponies! If the small group of shit stirrers don't stir the shit Rex May 2015 #66