Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cyberswede

(26,117 posts)
10. Not just good...essential.
Thu May 7, 2015, 06:55 PM
May 2015

Having robust debate on issues and positions makes all the candidates stronger.

The eventual nominee can then bring their best game to the general.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The more the merrier. No matter what election. JaneyVee May 2015 #1
Ditto rock May 2015 #70
Coronations are for monarchies and Repukes. hifiguy May 2015 #2
Good by a long shot NoJusticeNoPeace May 2015 #3
Maybe it can give the eventual candidate a better sense of what voting Dems are thinking? CanonRay May 2015 #4
It's a very good thing to have multiple candidates. peacebird May 2015 #5
Good. blm May 2015 #6
I am glad Bernie is in the race. I am a Hillary upaloopa May 2015 #7
Exactly! You are spot on... CTyankee May 2015 #41
Well said. nt. NCTraveler May 2015 #47
IMO, the purpose of primaries should be to hash out which candidate best represents winter is coming May 2015 #8
Obviously the opposition has not hurt her in any way so I say go ahead and oppose! leftofcool May 2015 #9
You see what is wrong with your statement, correct? LondonReign2 May 2015 #43
GOP hasn't hurt her yet. She still beats most of them by double digits. leftofcool May 2015 #76
Not just good...essential. cyberswede May 2015 #10
Concur with that cyberswede! bluesbassman May 2015 #30
I oppose her because I want to win in the General. She is a loser for our party on that alone. NYC_SKP May 2015 #11
Good. I'd like to see more primaries in congressional races too n/t arcane1 May 2015 #12
Gonna exercise my new rule, do NOT respond to that group of people NoJusticeNoPeace May 2015 #13
I believe winning in 2016 is critical. I'd rather Clinton spend time and money speaking out against Hoyt May 2015 #14
Hi Hoyt. I too believe winning in 2016 is critical. lovemydog May 2015 #20
fighting off pests? seveneyes May 2015 #25
Obviously good (nt) CrawlingChaos May 2015 #15
If God wanted you to have a choice, there would be multiple Hillary Clintons. Liberal Veteran May 2015 #16
Very good. For example, Bernie Sanders has a sincere message lovemydog May 2015 #17
It gives the people choices and allows scrutiny of the candidates. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2015 #18
It's a good thing. KMOD May 2015 #19
I think four or five more would be good. Agnosticsherbet May 2015 #21
I agree. kentuck May 2015 #22
A lot depends on how the campaign is run ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #23
Agree with a lot of what you say. blue neen May 2015 #33
I don't understand Dyedinthewoolliberal May 2015 #24
Must be important? kentuck May 2015 #27
No matter how much talking folks do Dyedinthewoolliberal May 2015 #32
Are you saying that the Iowa caucuses is 18 months away? jwirr May 2015 #36
No Dyedinthewoolliberal May 2015 #59
Yes, and that is not the rush. We are working on the primaries now. Iowa and NH are the first ones jwirr May 2015 #61
and when is that date? Dyedinthewoolliberal May 2015 #71
I do not know what that date is because I no longer live in Iowa. But I know that is when the jwirr May 2015 #72
Voting between these two is much much closer than 18 months. nt. NCTraveler May 2015 #46
Of course it's a good thing. The Velveteen Ocelot May 2015 #26
good roody May 2015 #28
My original pick for prez has never won the nomination Gman May 2015 #29
Good. bigwillq May 2015 #31
AFN: Absolutely Fucking Necessary Throd May 2015 #34
In the primary, it is good. Having options is good otherwise why have a primary? uppityperson May 2015 #35
It's a good thing. Blue_In_AK May 2015 #37
Good for the party, good for her, good for the country Yo_Mama May 2015 #38
No objections to a fair fight but that's not what we've got here. ucrdem May 2015 #39
Being an independent is an unfair advantage? Who knew LondonReign2 May 2015 #44
Think about it. ucrdem May 2015 #48
ANYONE can do that tkmorris May 2015 #62
But they wouldn't ucrdem May 2015 #64
Enforceable guarantee? There isn't one. For anyone tkmorris May 2015 #65
Right, which is why he should run as an Independent. ucrdem May 2015 #66
Right. being an independent is so advantageous that everyone wants to do it! LondonReign2 May 2015 #73
LMAO, Hillary has 91% name recognition, hundreds of millions of $$$, DNC backing, has been merrily May 2015 #51
I'd rather avoid a Dem crash and burn though I imagine some would find it thrilling. nt ucrdem May 2015 #53
In your mind, it seems to be inconceivable that Hillary would lose the general. merrily May 2015 #55
I can think of many ways she could lose and a Nader maneuver is just one. nt ucrdem May 2015 #56
Where is your mind? yallerdawg May 2015 #58
How Bernie Sanders will help Hillary Clinton in the general election Gothmog May 2015 #40
I think it is a good thing - gets the Dems thinking about the issues and how significant DrDan May 2015 #42
It is good to support who you want to be in the general. NCTraveler May 2015 #45
I think it is the purpose of primaries to give people choices Marrah_G May 2015 #49
Whoever wants to run in the primaries should run. MineralMan May 2015 #50
I was in favor of Bernie joining the race. Seeing how his supporters act, now I am not so sure. stevenleser May 2015 #52
Take away TPP and Clinton Cash and Bernie has no campaign. ucrdem May 2015 #57
It's lazy and counterproductive. If I was advocating for Bernie, I would have a lot to say stevenleser May 2015 #67
Way Good. Hiraeth May 2015 #54
The framing of this question is utterly insane. True Blue Door May 2015 #60
Unlike Republicans, Democrats do not select the "next person in line." yellowcanine May 2015 #63
It is absolutely good. lumberjack_jeff May 2015 #68
I think we have a lot on the line in 2016 - TBF May 2015 #69
It's a waste of time. Clinton is being coronated and will preside as a far right "democrat" Doctor_J May 2015 #74
A robust primary season is essential. What is counterproductive is the scene at DU.... Hekate May 2015 #75
Having one name on the ballot reminds me of the old Soviet Union Binkie The Clown May 2015 #77
Well it depends on if you like democracy or not imo. Rex May 2015 #78
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Let's just get this out i...»Reply #10