Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Let's just get this out in the open. [View all]cyberswede
(26,117 posts)10. Not just good...essential.
Having robust debate on issues and positions makes all the candidates stronger.
The eventual nominee can then bring their best game to the general.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
78 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Maybe it can give the eventual candidate a better sense of what voting Dems are thinking?
CanonRay
May 2015
#4
IMO, the purpose of primaries should be to hash out which candidate best represents
winter is coming
May 2015
#8
Obviously the opposition has not hurt her in any way so I say go ahead and oppose!
leftofcool
May 2015
#9
I oppose her because I want to win in the General. She is a loser for our party on that alone.
NYC_SKP
May 2015
#11
I believe winning in 2016 is critical. I'd rather Clinton spend time and money speaking out against
Hoyt
May 2015
#14
If God wanted you to have a choice, there would be multiple Hillary Clintons.
Liberal Veteran
May 2015
#16
Yes, and that is not the rush. We are working on the primaries now. Iowa and NH are the first ones
jwirr
May 2015
#61
I do not know what that date is because I no longer live in Iowa. But I know that is when the
jwirr
May 2015
#72
In the primary, it is good. Having options is good otherwise why have a primary?
uppityperson
May 2015
#35
Right. being an independent is so advantageous that everyone wants to do it!
LondonReign2
May 2015
#73
LMAO, Hillary has 91% name recognition, hundreds of millions of $$$, DNC backing, has been
merrily
May 2015
#51
I'd rather avoid a Dem crash and burn though I imagine some would find it thrilling. nt
ucrdem
May 2015
#53
In your mind, it seems to be inconceivable that Hillary would lose the general.
merrily
May 2015
#55
I think it is a good thing - gets the Dems thinking about the issues and how significant
DrDan
May 2015
#42
I was in favor of Bernie joining the race. Seeing how his supporters act, now I am not so sure.
stevenleser
May 2015
#52
It's lazy and counterproductive. If I was advocating for Bernie, I would have a lot to say
stevenleser
May 2015
#67
It's a waste of time. Clinton is being coronated and will preside as a far right "democrat"
Doctor_J
May 2015
#74