Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Let's just get this out in the open. [View all]Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)21. I think four or five more would be good.
It will make debates more interesting.
I'd rather not see a Republican style cattle stampede.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
78 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Maybe it can give the eventual candidate a better sense of what voting Dems are thinking?
CanonRay
May 2015
#4
IMO, the purpose of primaries should be to hash out which candidate best represents
winter is coming
May 2015
#8
Obviously the opposition has not hurt her in any way so I say go ahead and oppose!
leftofcool
May 2015
#9
I oppose her because I want to win in the General. She is a loser for our party on that alone.
NYC_SKP
May 2015
#11
I believe winning in 2016 is critical. I'd rather Clinton spend time and money speaking out against
Hoyt
May 2015
#14
If God wanted you to have a choice, there would be multiple Hillary Clintons.
Liberal Veteran
May 2015
#16
Yes, and that is not the rush. We are working on the primaries now. Iowa and NH are the first ones
jwirr
May 2015
#61
I do not know what that date is because I no longer live in Iowa. But I know that is when the
jwirr
May 2015
#72
In the primary, it is good. Having options is good otherwise why have a primary?
uppityperson
May 2015
#35
Right. being an independent is so advantageous that everyone wants to do it!
LondonReign2
May 2015
#73
LMAO, Hillary has 91% name recognition, hundreds of millions of $$$, DNC backing, has been
merrily
May 2015
#51
I'd rather avoid a Dem crash and burn though I imagine some would find it thrilling. nt
ucrdem
May 2015
#53
In your mind, it seems to be inconceivable that Hillary would lose the general.
merrily
May 2015
#55
I think it is a good thing - gets the Dems thinking about the issues and how significant
DrDan
May 2015
#42
I was in favor of Bernie joining the race. Seeing how his supporters act, now I am not so sure.
stevenleser
May 2015
#52
It's lazy and counterproductive. If I was advocating for Bernie, I would have a lot to say
stevenleser
May 2015
#67
It's a waste of time. Clinton is being coronated and will preside as a far right "democrat"
Doctor_J
May 2015
#74