Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Clinton's long history as a warhawk [View all]Divernan
(15,480 posts)15. Village Voice referred to HRC as "Mama Warbucks."
Yes, I full well realize these quotes detail her actions in the Senate - not yesterday! Her supporters tout her Senate years as qualifying her for the Oval Office - so they are on the table for consideration.
Mama Warbucks
Her presidential campaign has received far more money from defense contractors than any other candidate Democrat or Republican and her close ties to the defense industry has led the Village Voice to refer to her as Mama Warbucks. She has even fought the Bush administration in restoring funding for some of the very few weapons systems the Bush administration has sought to cut in recent years. Pentagon officials and defense contractors have given Senator Clinton high marks for listening to their concerns, promoting their products and leveraging her ties to the Pentagon, comparing her favorably to the hawkish former Washington Senator Scoop Jackson and other pro-military Democrats of earlier eras.
http://fpif.org/hillary_clinton_on_military_policy/
MAMA WARBUCKS (headline)
When someone like Newt Gingrich commends a Democrat's service on the Senate Armed Services Committee, you know you're looking at a serious hawk. That hawk is Hillary Clinton, junior senator from blue-state New York and possible presidential candidate in 2008.
Gingrich, with an eye on his White House bid, told a group of newspaper editors last month that she'd make a formidable opponent. "Senator Clinton is very competent, very professional, very intelligently moving toward the center, very shrewdly and effectively serving on the Armed Services Committee," the GOP hard-liner said. Gringrich should know: He sits with her on a star-studded Pentagon advisory group.
When not fending off terrorists or bucking up the troops in Iraq, Clinton has been equally fierce about defending defense dollars for her home state. Senator Hillary Clinton may never see New York return to its glory days of defense contracting, when it was known as the "cradle of aviation." But she's trying. In fiscal 2003 before Clinton got her spot on the committee, New York ranked 13 out of 50 states in contracts, with $4.3 billion. Today, the latest statistics show that the Empire State has nudged up a point to 12 in the nation, with $5.2 billion in procurements.
Just ask Joe Lieberman of Connecticut, who got the back-off sign from her at an April 19 budget meeting of a Senate Armed Services subcommittee. Clinton isn't assigned to this smaller group, but she showed up anyway. And we know what she said, because her aides sent out a press release and video snippet of their Democratic boss fighting the good fight on Capitol Hill.
http://www.villagevoice.com/2005-04-26/news/mama-warbucks/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
97 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Must be a qualitative belief, because it's certainly not quantitatively as bad.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
May 2015
#6
Can't win for losing. If you object to a third wayer on grounds of political position, you're too
merrily
May 2015
#12
And you're buying that Hillary overrode the President and the Pentagon re: military action?
Buzz Clik
May 2015
#26
Bullshit. I don't doubt that there are sources, but I do doubt their accuracy on one issue.
Buzz Clik
May 2015
#53
If someone says something bad about Hillary, they become an "anti-Hillary source," apparently.
Comrade Grumpy
May 2015
#77
The dirty secret of the 2016 campaign will be how big defense issues will play.
Renew Deal
May 2015
#29
The 2002 vote giving GW Bush authority to invade Iraq is my #1 litmus test in a Democratic primary
Martin Eden
May 2015
#30
I hadn't discovered DU yet, I was immersed in scrambling to save my career
magical thyme
May 2015
#44
Interesting a post to show Hillary as a "war hawk" and it brings to light by Bernie backers
Thinkingabout
May 2015
#36
If Bernie has been in Congress for 25 years he has not shown he is willing to handle national
Thinkingabout
May 2015
#59
He's been in Congress long enough to staunchly support the U.S. bombing campaign in Kosovo
LanternWaste
May 2015
#87
His voting for the last couple of decades has proven he is not willing to handle national security.
Thinkingabout
May 2015
#60
What are you trying to say? He has voted countless times on national security issues.
Comrade Grumpy
May 2015
#83
Bernie voted against sending American men & women into a war even the UN refused to sanction
think
May 2015
#64
Yep, you have listed a vote by Bernie which brings to question his ability to handle national
Thinkingabout
May 2015
#65
Is this the only time a bill dealing with national security has come before Congress?
Thinkingabout
May 2015
#73
Please feel free to explain how this brings into question Sander's leadership on national security.
think
May 2015
#68
He has had several times in which he could have taken a stand on national security and I have yet to
Thinkingabout
May 2015
#72
I have responded more than once. If this is the only thing he has voted on in two
Thinkingabout
May 2015
#92
some here seem to think that her recent statement of regret over her Iraq war vote
magical thyme
May 2015
#96