Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
50. Because there's no reason to not believe it.
Fri May 8, 2015, 11:47 AM
May 2015
the "good parts" would be the openly available USTR's Negotiating Objectives

No, those are the claimed goals of the TPP. There is no reason to believe that those goals are being achieved. Nor is there any reason to believe those goals are achieved by the specifics in the agreement.

Remember, we constantly have to battle Democrats who believe NAFTA was good for US jobs.

Trade agreements will NEVER be a "liberal nirvana", and it has never been cast as such

OH MY GOD SOMEONE USED HYPERBOLE!! THAT IS NOT ALLOWED!!!!

The counter-argument is that the "job loss" argument is speculative, based on previous agreements that did NOT have worker and environmental protections in the trade partner countries.

Apparently you're not familiar with NAFTA. It had a retraining program and supposedly required worker and environmental protections. Those protections were poorly designed enough to be meaningless. And without the specifics of the TPP, we have no reason to believe they got it right this time - the same people swore they got it right last time.

It doesn't require much in the way of worker and environmental protections to stem the tide of labor arbitrage

That would be true if worker and environmental protections were the main driver of higher US labor costs. They aren't. Cost of living is.

especially when the off-shoring trend is already reversing itself do to the inefficiencies that have been realized, e.g., the design/engineering to production to design/engineering lag, the customer service language barrier issues, etc.

Except the jobs that are being "re-shored" do not come remotely close to offsetting the jobs lost. "Re-shored" manufacturing is far more automated than it was when it left the US. So you bring the factory back to the US and hire 5 workers instead of 500.

Design/engineering didn't leave the US to begin with, and customer service jobs offer nothing like the pay and benefits of manufacturing jobs.

the bigger concern regarding STEM jobs is the broken American H1-B program

Yes, I left that out since I was talking about those who lose manufacturing jobs. Even without H1Bs, anyone over 40 will have a very hard time moving into STEM from manufacturing. You really need at least 4-year degree to even make an attempt at entering the field. Some retraining won't cut it. Add in the massive age bias in most STEM hiring, and that older person will have a very hard time switching to a STEM job.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Does this sound familiar? Deja Vu is headed our way... RiverLover May 2015 #1
Because if our deomcratic sulphurdunn May 2015 #42
Boom. You nailed it! GoneFishin May 2015 #55
Clinton gave us the Digital Millennium Copyright Act hifiguy May 2015 #120
Because we have no true Labor Party ... Fantastic Anarchist May 2015 #78
HUGE K&R Never forget that NEOLIBERALS are pushing this shit on workers scam. 99Forever May 2015 #2
Correct. And I believe that is how you get backlash votes like the TBF May 2015 #22
ding ding ding! RiverLover May 2015 #53
+1 BrotherIvan May 2015 #56
Absolutely Exactly. nt Fantastic Anarchist May 2015 #79
Well NAFTA was literally a Republican deal, originated, negotiated and signed by George Bush Bluenorthwest May 2015 #3
Why did Clinton "walk through" a republican deal? He sold it to Americans! Myself included. RiverLover May 2015 #5
Bill kept NAFTA because he was wrong. Why did the author of this piece leave Bush out of the NAFTA Bluenorthwest May 2015 #10
LOL I agree: RiverLover May 2015 #13
I suspect ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #40
Who cares where it came from? Fantastic Anarchist May 2015 #80
Good post Dem2 May 2015 #52
Apparently you missed the point of the OP. nm rhett o rick May 2015 #74
The reason that Bush wasn't mentioned is a distraction from the point of the OP. rhett o rick May 2015 #69
I have a friend that does this. Maedhros May 2015 #71
There is no reason to edit out Bush - TBF May 2015 #25
Bubba did more than sign it. merrily May 2015 #28
You would think sulphurdunn May 2015 #47
Nice synopsis from sulpherdunn the question is... sorechasm May 2015 #96
+1! Warren gave good ex of this, a French company that sued Egypt because Egypt raised its minimum RiverLover May 2015 #97
Well, you kind of miss one important point -- the state can sue the corporation in their own courts. Hoyt May 2015 #112
There have been twice sulphurdunn May 2015 #113
Can you point to one case where the corporation won on raising minimum wage, anti-smoking campaigns? Hoyt May 2015 #114
When referring to countries sulphurdunn May 2015 #115
Hopefully, you looked for examples and have learned there aren't many. Hoyt May 2015 #116
Corporations are not altruistic. sulphurdunn May 2015 #117
+1000 nt. polly7 May 2015 #118
He did. cheapdate May 2015 #54
Plus Clinton's VP, our beloved Al Gore, made the case for it in a debate RufusTFirefly May 2015 #62
Definitely Poppy's brain child. On the other hand Bubba did a lot more than merely walk it through. merrily May 2015 #30
I'll bet many of us mocked Ross Perot and his "giant sucking sound," though. J/S. WinkyDink May 2015 #4
Not me. I didn't vote for Perot, but whatever else you may have thought of him, maddiemom May 2015 #6
I did vote for him kacekwl May 2015 #8
Me too. I was pretty young. He made a lot of sense. I went with it. Ed Suspicious May 2015 #17
Same, I knew these bastards were waiting like a spider in a web to ship high-paying jobs elsewhere. BlueJazz May 2015 #19
No regrets for me at all voting for Perot. He was far from ideal I understand that also. Person 2713 May 2015 #31
So did I Mojorabbit May 2015 #48
I almost voted for him, but when he dropped out davidpdx May 2015 #88
I remember how Perot was mocked for his charts and graphs. Maedhros May 2015 #72
Yep RiverLover May 2015 #7
As kooky as that guy seemed, he did make sense sometimes. HappyMe May 2015 #11
Right? He came across as a dweeb, really a shame. The message got lost in the messenger. nt RiverLover May 2015 #12
I kind of liked the dweeb type thing though. HappyMe May 2015 #14
I would like that now that I'm older & wiser. lol RiverLover May 2015 #16
And some of his message ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #41
Whew! Doc Holliday May 2015 #51
That's not even "20/20 hindsight" ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #59
I voted for him as well Punx May 2015 #27
My Favorite Wingnut uses that phrase all the time in attacking Clinton. Jackpine Radical May 2015 #35
Wall Street Wins. Octafish May 2015 #9
Its getting old. Really old. We're the perpetual Bad News Bears, always losing to corporations RiverLover May 2015 #15
I agree. HappyMe May 2015 #23
Fight the future! yallerdawg May 2015 #18
this is NOT the only template for trade. cali May 2015 #20
Thanks for the view from the US Chamber of Commerce. nt Romulox May 2015 #21
It's beyond laughable... sendero May 2015 #29
So it's failed every previous time, but this time it'll work! jeff47 May 2015 #37
Healthcare reform failed every previous time (for the last 50 years), too ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #43
If that were true, we'd also have seen leaks of the "good" parts of the TPP. jeff47 May 2015 #45
Why would you assume that? ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #49
Because there's no reason to not believe it. jeff47 May 2015 #50
Wait ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #73
History did not start yesterday. jeff47 May 2015 #119
Okay. n/t 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #121
Failing to pass proposals and actually passing failures is a nonsensical comparison TheKentuckian May 2015 #76
Okay. n/t 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #82
Health Insurance reform you mean. TM99 May 2015 #94
Truth!!^^^ RiverLover May 2015 #95
See post #100 for reality. n/t 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #101
Actually, I meant "healthcare financing reform" ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #100
I love it when advocates of single payer attack ACA as "just insurance reform"... Recursion May 2015 #106
Universal health care or medicare for all TM99 May 2015 #107
Umm... Medicare is "insurance". You do realize that, right? Recursion May 2015 #108
I know exactly what it is TM99 May 2015 #109
Apparently you don't, since you mentioned Europe. I don't think any European country Recursion May 2015 #110
I don't see the parallels Bradical79 May 2015 #99
The parallel is ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #103
"Health Care Reform" failed this time too - bread_and_roses May 2015 #104
See Post 100 ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #105
LOL, nice try! nt Logical May 2015 #65
We're making progress on getting the facts out. yallerdawg May 2015 #66
"What massive trade agreement do we have with China?" It's called PNTR. hedda_foil May 2015 #90
So you are telling me... yallerdawg May 2015 #91
No, every country we trade with does not get onto status. It's what used to be called most favored hedda_foil May 2015 #92
They moved to Mexico for a year or two... kentuck May 2015 #24
And the resultant crash of the Mexican economy, combined with Jackpine Radical May 2015 #36
So without NAFTA, "they" would have stayed in the US for another "year or two" and then "moved pampango May 2015 #75
Kick and R. BeanMusical May 2015 #26
HUGE K & R !!! - THANK YOU !!! WillyT May 2015 #32
No, America's Leadership is About fredamae May 2015 #33
The ones putting this shit in place do not care about the working classes Marrah_G May 2015 #34
According the CEO types in this country Americans don't WANT manufacturing jobs.... Spitfire of ATJ May 2015 #38
Not a mistake RoccoR5955 May 2015 #39
NAFTA worked exactly as intended. Maybe even better than intended. pa28 May 2015 #70
Really interesting post, pa28 RiverLover May 2015 #83
THIS^^^^^^^ SomeGuyInEagan May 2015 #123
K&R! Phlem May 2015 #44
The hits to the working and middle classes just keep on coming.... blackspade May 2015 #46
Raise your hand if you think this makes her extremely vulnerable in the general BrotherIvan May 2015 #57
It was a huge reason many supported Obama instead in 2008 - TBF May 2015 #58
Zactly BrotherIvan May 2015 #60
If a (D) signs it Puzzledtraveller May 2015 #61
I really don't like the tone of the article . . FairWinds May 2015 #63
You make good points - TBF May 2015 #64
Exactly! nikto May 2015 #77
Here's some international action ag TPP...if only we could coordinate! RiverLover May 2015 #84
point well taken ibegurpard May 2015 #87
I say NAFTA.... awoke_in_2003 May 2015 #67
Not a mistake. NAFTA did exactly what it was supposed to and what was expected. pa28 May 2015 #68
I believe Obama believes the TPP will do good for "us". jomin41 May 2015 #81
he believes no such thing Skittles May 2015 #86
Every president must leave office, but not before setting in motion the means to fuck over whereisjustice May 2015 #85
Clintonia yadig May 2015 #89
K & R AzDar May 2015 #93
Clinton-Obama-Clinton = NAFTA-TPP-??? polichick May 2015 #98
Seriously!! RiverLover May 2015 #122
It's not a mistake, LWolf May 2015 #102
Dragging out middle class down to the Mexican standard of living... krispos42 May 2015 #111
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»America is about to make ...»Reply #50