Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

BillStein

(758 posts)

4. That's the point, exactly

Reply to Freddie Stubbs (Reply #2)

Wed May 9, 2012, 12:34 PM

May 2012

when the courts rule that you cannot discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation, I will feel safe. Until then, my rights are subject to the whim of the majority. Not a pleasant way to live

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What if a state with a non-white majority voted... [View all] NightWatcher May 2012 OP

I don't know mactime May 2012 #1

Was using hyperbole to illustrate that a majority should not be allowed NightWatcher May 2012 #3

What do you think Jim Crow laws were? EFerrari May 2012 #7

Courts have established the precedent that the government cannot discriminate on the basis of race Freddie Stubbs May 2012 #2

That's the point, exactly BillStein May 2012 #4

Im sorry MrDiaz May 2012 #5

My partner, a US citizen, BillStein May 2012 #6

personally I think we should outlaw christian marriages, they don't seem to work out that well nt msongs May 2012 #8

There would be an uprising by those affected and a few supporters. aikoaiko May 2012 #9