Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So last month HBO ran a documentary about a religion. They portrayed the central figure of that [View all]PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)141. What other religions are "not real"? Just so we're all clear, you know.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
262 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So last month HBO ran a documentary about a religion. They portrayed the central figure of that [View all]
Warren DeMontague
May 2015
OP
Forget the religion part, most if not all in scientolgy dont pretend it is a religion
NoJusticeNoPeace
May 2015
#1
I think if you really want to go down the road of separating "genuine religions" from con jobs
Warren DeMontague
May 2015
#35
The Roman Catholic Church is ostensibly based upon a guy who said "give your stuff to the poor"
Warren DeMontague
May 2015
#40
Read the New Testament, Jesus was an "end of times" Jewish preacher who ...
Humanist_Activist
May 2015
#109
Sometimes I see stuff from people who call themselves "progressives" that blows me right away.
Warren DeMontague
May 2015
#13
...okay, so what she does in not constitutionally protected under the 1st Amendment?
Warren DeMontague
May 2015
#12
And yet, it was Mohammed CARTOONS that drew the violent response, both here and at Charlie Hebdo.
Warren DeMontague
May 2015
#17
Yep, and we've known this is often the type of reaction to these cartoons
justiceischeap
May 2015
#18
Do folks miss the de-humanizing that such analogies encourage? Or is it intentional?
X_Digger
May 2015
#25
I've also seen a shark analogy used here. Another reason these animal analogies fail is --
Nuclear Unicorn
May 2015
#209
Yep, and we've known this is often the type of reaction to these cartoons
justiceischeap
May 2015
#18
So if Muslims are 'the bear' and thus too dangerous to 'poke' what message are you sending to other
Bluenorthwest
May 2015
#23
yes, but as someone else pointed out- Charlie Hebdo ridiculed all religions equally
notadmblnd
May 2015
#32
true, but we had pretty much the same identical discussions here, after Charlie Hebdo.
Warren DeMontague
May 2015
#34
And I never said "the First Amendment is absolute", so you were disputing a point no one made.
Warren DeMontague
May 2015
#62
Like I said, that would probably have to be a civil suit, filed BY the attendees in question.
Warren DeMontague
May 2015
#93
"fighting words" - that exception has been narrowed down to almost nothing.
Warren Stupidity
May 2015
#54
And saying "I'll draw an offensive cartoon tomorrow"- isn't very imminent. ;)
X_Digger
May 2015
#115
Every time someone plays "itchycoo park" on the radio, they are telling people to "Get HI-IIGH!!"
Warren DeMontague
May 2015
#132
Actually the majority of CH's cartoons were aimed at politicians and culture wars
riderinthestorm
May 2015
#212
What if some extremist Republicans threatened to kill anyone who makes fun of Jeb Bush?
oberliner
May 2015
#76
Did the folk who made that doco advocate genocide against adherents of that religion?
Violet_Crumble
May 2015
#44
Is there a difference between "people shouldn't be allowed to" and "people should choose not to"
el_bryanto
May 2015
#47
OK - then on a strictly legal matter Geller should be allowed to say whatever she likes.
el_bryanto
May 2015
#50
Did HBO run the documentary for the intended purposes of provoking Scientologists to violence?
Tommy_Carcetti
May 2015
#55
God that's tiresome. I have to assume that you have never bothered to look at the work of Andres
Bluenorthwest
May 2015
#155
So; Fundamentalists who think they have a mandate from the sky to kill cartoonists
Warren DeMontague
May 2015
#63
Provocation is in the eye of the beholder. Every single attacker who ever attached anyone anywhere
PeaceNikki
May 2015
#67
Agree. Many organized religions treat me as a second class citizen or worse.
PeaceNikki
May 2015
#73
It's too bad that's the world we live in right now, but my denomination, the Episcopalians
Damansarajaya
May 2015
#78
I'm not asking you to do anything. You're asking others to stop mocking and ridiculing people whose
PeaceNikki
May 2015
#80
I'll stop ridiculing organized religion when they stop threatening my autonomy.
PeaceNikki
May 2015
#79
Yeah, it's a major distraction from the peaceful GD banter between the Hillary and Bernie people
Warren DeMontague
May 2015
#64
"money-making corporation that uses the religious cult as its business model"
FLPanhandle
May 2015
#70
Holy shit. Those hospital takeovers are not a good thing for women, you know.
PeaceNikki
May 2015
#82
When was the last time you heard of an atheist institution lobbying against women's rights?
beam me up scottie
May 2015
#86
Atheist equivalent of Mother Theresa, Martin Luther King, Jr., or Benjamin Tutu?
LostOne4Ever
May 2015
#94
There's so many, it's hard to limit the list isn't it? I'd add Andrei Sakharov
riderinthestorm
May 2015
#105
He strikes me as marginally better than the guy who came before him.
Warren DeMontague
May 2015
#129
When a religion is based upon text(s) that calls homosexuality an abomination, demands women be
LostOne4Ever
May 2015
#189
I have found, when it comes to religion here, it is like Animal Farm...
Behind the Aegis
May 2015
#246
Oh my god!! The RCC??! You're putting that corrupt institution up as some paragon of virtue?!
riderinthestorm
May 2015
#106
I'm pretty sure I have no desire to see Tom Cruise and Co. shoot up some event. nt
Tommy_Carcetti
May 2015
#91
You know who also believes in unseen forces that can't be proven? Astrophysicists.
Damansarajaya
May 2015
#69
Right, and the minute God or Vishnu or Zeus, Ra or Osiris exerts a measurable gravitational
Warren DeMontague
May 2015
#74
I'm fine with "religion is silly", although indeed it wasn't the point of this thread.
Warren Stupidity
May 2015
#103
"Trouble is, it can't be perceived with the five senses" - does not mean "can't be proven to exist".
Warren Stupidity
May 2015
#102
In one week, we've found an "Astrophysics is faith guy" and a "blind watchmaker" guy...
Act_of_Reparation
May 2015
#112
You seem to know less than nothing about astrophysics, not to mention what you said...
Humanist_Activist
May 2015
#108
According to the DU Sliding Scale of Arbitrary Postmodern Morality...
Act_of_Reparation
May 2015
#110
LOL! No kidding, imagine NG's outrage if someone claimed islam wasn't a real religion.
beam me up scottie
May 2015
#111
"Scientology's followers are no more or less religious than any other believers."
NanceGreggs
May 2015
#113
Yes, because the unprovable flarmfaddle THEY believe in is extra flarmfaddle-ish.
Warren DeMontague
May 2015
#121
"I've known more than a few in my day - they're not about what one believes"
beam me up scottie
May 2015
#137
If you watched the documentary, there are people who DEFINITELY believe in Xenu the way
Warren DeMontague
May 2015
#138
Hey, I bash scientology all the time, I just don't bash ONLY scientology.
beam me up scottie
May 2015
#146
You might want to think about why you feel such a need to point out, repeatedly,
mr blur
May 2015
#151
There are independent Scientologist not connected with the Church of Scientology
Chathamization
May 2015
#153
If I put honey in your tea because I think you're allergic to it and it will kill you it's the same
Chathamization
May 2015
#154
which, in both situations is adulterating someone else's food/drink without their consent or
Warren DeMontague
May 2015
#157
Well, I suppose if you want to equate attempts to sweeten with attempts to kill.
Chathamization
May 2015
#158
and yet here you are, comparing the drawing of a cartoon that someone doesnt like
Warren DeMontague
May 2015
#159
Let's be honest here. In response to the OP, I gave an example of adding honey to a drink
Chathamization
May 2015
#160
No idea why you feel that's being evaded since everyone here seems to agree the attack was terrible
Chathamization
May 2015
#178
Why is she legally culpable for the fact that OTHER people get pissed off?
Warren DeMontague
May 2015
#190
You don't get to assault/kill other people and claim you were provoked into doing it.
beam me up scottie
May 2015
#161
Has anyone on DU, anywhere, argued that it's OK to assault/kill people because they were provoked?
Chathamization
May 2015
#162
OK, has anyone said that you "get to assault/kill other people and claim you were provoked into
Chathamization
May 2015
#180
It doesn't mean that at all. No one seems to be saying that a political cartoonist is liable for
Chathamization
May 2015
#196
his exact words were "Insulting someone's deity when it is known to cause violence"
Warren DeMontague
May 2015
#199
Again - when the intent is to incite violence. If you choose to ignore that part, his meaning
Chathamization
May 2015
#201
I argue, the posters intent is completely clear, even if you persist in ignoring it
Chathamization
May 2015
#203
For the nth time, the difference you keep ignoring is the intent to incite violence.
Chathamization
May 2015
#207
Ive seen people argue that blasphemy or "insulting a deity" should be illegal.
Warren DeMontague
May 2015
#165
Links to people who've said insulting a deity should be illegal? Because I haven't seen those posts.
Chathamization
May 2015
#179
Did you read that post? They're saying that Geller is culpable for trying to incite violence, not
Chathamization
May 2015
#197
And if people believe in an interpretation of their religion where they feel shooting people is a valid
Warren DeMontague
May 2015
#170
No, I am championing her right to air her noxious-ass views under the 1st Amendment.
Warren DeMontague
May 2015
#194
I'm saying that a small minority of people HAVE argued her speech is somehow not protected under the
Warren DeMontague
May 2015
#232
No, I give the vast majority of Muslims a ton more credit than that.
Warren DeMontague
May 2015
#251
Side stepping & obfuscation? You're the one pretending this is about everything EXCEPT cartoons.
Warren DeMontague
May 2015
#255
"keep trying to take apart an argument I'm not making"...ah, who said irony was dead! N/T
Chathamization
May 2015
#237
That's right. And the ACLU was correct to defend their right to do so. The courts were right to say
Warren DeMontague
May 2015
#192
If you have a strong moral objection to criticizing, satirizing or mocking deeply held beliefs
PeaceNikki
May 2015
#216
Liberal Christians should be leading the charge at mocking those who deserve it
PeaceNikki
May 2015
#218
Not fair? Well funded, hugely successful, widespread efforts to limit my autonomy are not fair.
PeaceNikki
May 2015
#222
Some of the core tenets of Christianity teach that women are dangerous and must submit.
PeaceNikki
May 2015
#224