Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A political reality check. [View all]RiverLover
(7,830 posts)34. There were also "far-sighted" republicans in FDR's congress. "Progessive" Republicans even~
The New Deal wasnt just a product of Democratic super-majorities. Principled legislators in both parties were willing to work together to revive the economy.
The true conservative seeks to protect the system of private property and free enterprise by correcting such injustices and inequalities as arise from it. The most serious threat to our institutions comes from those who refuse to face the need for change. Liberalism becomes the protection for the far-sighted conservative. - Franklin D. Roosevelt
Republican Senator Olympia Snowes recent announcement that she has decided to leave the Senate because of partisan gridlock is being widely viewed on both sides of the aisle as further confirmation as if we needed it of just how dysfunctional our political process has become. In good health and likely to win if she were to run, Senator Snowe said she had to consider how productive an additional term would be given the polarized environment in Congress. In light of this, and in light of the fact that she does not expect the intense partisanship of recent years to change over the short term, she reluctantly decided not to seek re-election. Her fellow senator, Republican Susan Collins of Maine, remarked that she is devastated by the news, while Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont called her decision a real loss, noting that he misses the days when Republicans and Democrats worked together for the good of the country.
Partisanship has been part of Americas political process from the beginning. Why, then, is todays partisanship so much more destructive than in the past? The answer may lie in the makeup of the parties themselves. Many Americans, for example, assume that Franklin Roosevelt was able to get through such landmark pieces of legislation as the Social Security Act or the National Labor Relations Act because the Democrats held huge majorities in both houses of Congress. But the truth is that many of FDRs harshest critics came from the conservative wing of the Democratic Party, while some of his strongest supporters were progressive Republicans.
http://www.rooseveltinstitute.org/new-roosevelt/bipartisanship-made-new-deal-possible
The true conservative seeks to protect the system of private property and free enterprise by correcting such injustices and inequalities as arise from it. The most serious threat to our institutions comes from those who refuse to face the need for change. Liberalism becomes the protection for the far-sighted conservative. - Franklin D. Roosevelt
Republican Senator Olympia Snowes recent announcement that she has decided to leave the Senate because of partisan gridlock is being widely viewed on both sides of the aisle as further confirmation as if we needed it of just how dysfunctional our political process has become. In good health and likely to win if she were to run, Senator Snowe said she had to consider how productive an additional term would be given the polarized environment in Congress. In light of this, and in light of the fact that she does not expect the intense partisanship of recent years to change over the short term, she reluctantly decided not to seek re-election. Her fellow senator, Republican Susan Collins of Maine, remarked that she is devastated by the news, while Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont called her decision a real loss, noting that he misses the days when Republicans and Democrats worked together for the good of the country.
Partisanship has been part of Americas political process from the beginning. Why, then, is todays partisanship so much more destructive than in the past? The answer may lie in the makeup of the parties themselves. Many Americans, for example, assume that Franklin Roosevelt was able to get through such landmark pieces of legislation as the Social Security Act or the National Labor Relations Act because the Democrats held huge majorities in both houses of Congress. But the truth is that many of FDRs harshest critics came from the conservative wing of the Democratic Party, while some of his strongest supporters were progressive Republicans.
http://www.rooseveltinstitute.org/new-roosevelt/bipartisanship-made-new-deal-possible
Those days with sane rethugs who stood for people are long gone!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
35 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
In the foreseeable future which is all a reasonable person can purport to see
DemocratSinceBirth
May 2015
#1
Absolutely. I am very afraid that the answer to the last question may actually be: another Great
jwirr
May 2015
#5
Warren tried in 2013 with her "21st Century Glass-Steagall Act" bill which breaks up the banks
RiverLover
May 2015
#22
There were also "far-sighted" republicans in FDR's congress. "Progessive" Republicans even~
RiverLover
May 2015
#34
The next admin won't have this advantage: Obama's quid pro quo on raising taxes
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
May 2015
#25
all you have to do is look to obama yrs and how hard it was. see what happened to bill he passed
seabeyond
May 2015
#29
i think we have to address state power and gerrymandering to really get the support.
seabeyond
May 2015
#33