Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
34. There were also "far-sighted" republicans in FDR's congress. "Progessive" Republicans even~
Sat May 9, 2015, 02:29 PM
May 2015
The New Deal wasn’t just a product of Democratic super-majorities. Principled legislators in both parties were willing to work together to revive the economy.

The true conservative seeks to protect the system of private property and free enterprise by correcting such injustices and inequalities as arise from it. The most serious threat to our institutions comes from those who refuse to face the need for change. Liberalism becomes the protection for the far-sighted conservative. - Franklin D. Roosevelt

Republican Senator Olympia Snowe’s recent announcement that she has decided to leave the Senate because of partisan gridlock is being widely viewed on both sides of the aisle as further confirmation — as if we needed it — of just how dysfunctional our political process has become. In good health and likely to win if she were to run, Senator Snowe said she had to consider how productive an additional term would be given the “polarized environment” in Congress. In light of this, and in light of the fact that she does not expect the intense partisanship of recent years to change over the short term, she reluctantly decided not to seek re-election. Her fellow senator, Republican Susan Collins of Maine, remarked that she is “devastated” by the news, while Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont called her decision a real loss, noting that he misses the days when “Republicans and Democrats worked together” for the good of the country.

Partisanship has been part of America’s political process from the beginning. Why, then, is today’s partisanship so much more destructive than in the past? The answer may lie in the makeup of the parties themselves. Many Americans, for example, assume that Franklin Roosevelt was able to get through such landmark pieces of legislation as the Social Security Act or the National Labor Relations Act because the Democrats held huge majorities in both houses of Congress. But the truth is that many of FDR’s harshest critics came from the conservative wing of the Democratic Party, while some of his strongest supporters were progressive Republicans.

http://www.rooseveltinstitute.org/new-roosevelt/bipartisanship-made-new-deal-possible


Those days with sane rethugs who stood for people are long gone!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

A political reality check. [View all] kentuck May 2015 OP
In the foreseeable future which is all a reasonable person can purport to see DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author whatchamacallit May 2015 #12
Here is another reality check - what will happen if we do not even try? djean111 May 2015 #2
I agree. kentuck May 2015 #4
I'm confused. Didn't Obama get obstructed on almost everything? WhaTHellsgoingonhere May 2015 #20
Absolutely. I am very afraid that the answer to the last question may actually be: another Great jwirr May 2015 #5
In my view ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #3
And if we don't find some way to make that change, Jackpine Radical May 2015 #6
The more important question is what will become onecaliberal May 2015 #7
Here are some things people were told about political realism in the past Bjorn Against May 2015 #8
Very difficult MaggieD May 2015 #9
To make changes to future realities... kentuck May 2015 #10
You're surprised rethugs are in charge.... MaggieD May 2015 #11
I'm not surprised Republicans are in charge... kentuck May 2015 #13
Well let's put it this way.... MaggieD May 2015 #14
Yeah, liberals really suck. kentuck May 2015 #15
The ones that bash Democrats do MaggieD May 2015 #16
You are bashing Democrats Bjorn Against May 2015 #18
People that spend their life bashing... MaggieD May 2015 #26
Well they sound like happy republicans.... MaggieD May 2015 #27
For someone who says you don't like seeing attacks on Democrats... Bjorn Against May 2015 #17
Which of the purists here.... MaggieD May 2015 #19
You don't have to run for office to be a Democrat Bjorn Against May 2015 #23
If people are going to parrot.... MaggieD May 2015 #24
This country will make no forward progress workinclasszero May 2015 #21
Warren tried in 2013 with her "21st Century Glass-Steagall Act" bill which breaks up the banks RiverLover May 2015 #22
Agreedd. Until we elect enough non-repubs nothing good will happen. riqster May 2015 #30
There were also "far-sighted" republicans in FDR's congress. "Progessive" Republicans even~ RiverLover May 2015 #34
The next admin won't have this advantage: Obama's quid pro quo on raising taxes WhaTHellsgoingonhere May 2015 #25
Here's the political reality: Maedhros May 2015 #28
all you have to do is look to obama yrs and how hard it was. see what happened to bill he passed seabeyond May 2015 #29
As long as many Americans seem to believe moondust May 2015 #31
This message was self-deleted by its author AtomicKitten May 2015 #32
i think we have to address state power and gerrymandering to really get the support. seabeyond May 2015 #33
The first and third could have been accomplished during the Exilednight May 2015 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A political reality check...»Reply #34