Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: America is about to make a horrible mistake all over again [View all]jeff47
(26,549 posts)119. History did not start yesterday.
And the "leaked" DRAFTS, something that you KNOW are incomplete, are to be more trusted?
Yes. Even if they are not exactly the final product, at this late stage in the negotiations they are close.
And the Obama administration is free to reveal that anything offensive in the leaked drafts have been renegotiated.
in negotiations, one doesn't broadcast what you are getting, until the deal is done ... that good faith cover is how you get what you want. When you broadcast what you are getting, those you are negotiating with that are giving way, can't be seen as having given in.
suggesting that the USTR's Negotiating Objectives have been reached, or met to a satisfactory degree? (Perhaps, you should confer with someone that negotiates for a living.)
Your bias is showing.
suggesting that the USTR's Negotiating Objectives have been reached, or met to a satisfactory degree? (Perhaps, you should confer with someone that negotiates for a living.)
Your bias is showing.
My bias is showing when you quote yourself. And apparently attack yourself.
Again ... Different President and different times
That's why we're getting 1990s policy. Because everything is different.
What are you talking about? Lax Foreign labor protections (e.g., low wages and unregulated working conditions) and virtually no environmental protections are THE key driver of labor arbitrage!
Nope. Your workers have to eat, and have to have a place to sleep.
Why is labor cheaper in some parts of the US? It isn't because of large differences in environmental laws - those are mostly federal. It isn't because of large differences in labor protection laws. Again, mostly federal.
What is different? Cost of living. A McDonalds in NYC has to pay more than a McDonalds in Syracuse. Same state. Same labor laws. Same environmental laws. Same job. Massive difference in cost of living and large difference in pay.
This is what President Obama is talking about when he referred "fighting the last war" ... the fact is much of the manufacturing jobs in the US are gone, and aren't coming back
So time to make things worse by repeating the same mistakes!! Full speed ahead! The iceberg will sink this time!
See, you are making the same claims as "the last war". You are claiming you will get good results, just like the last war. And now you desperately need people to forget about the results of the last war.
If you want to show that this is an entirely different situation, show that it actually is different. So far, all that has come out is the same promises as last time.
... for exactly the reason you state: AUTOMATION ... but the jobs that ARE being re-shored are those that industry has not figured out a way to effectively automate.
No. Those jobs remain offshore. Re-shoring is trivial except in highly automated manufacturing. Design and development never moved offshore in significant numbers, so you can't point to those jobs as successes.
True, and by addressing the labor arbitrage matter, through universal worker and environmental protections, we also address the Design/Engineering to production lag ... further, making off-shoring less attractive (profitable).
To translate from your attempt to make this sound good, "When we make our workers accept Vietnam's minimum wage, we'll get so many jobs!!!"
Are you arguing fact or assertion? http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t24.htm ... with the exception of "Leisure and hospitality" wages across occupations are comparable to those of manufacturing.
History did not start yesterday.
Manufacturing jobs of the 1960s paid six figures in 2015 money. They're gone, thanks to offshoring. You're now pushing a treaty to increase offshoring. Just how little do you think US workers should be paid?
While I agree with most of this ... you are taking the speculations about jobs losses, as an article of faith
No, every single "free trade" deal in the last 40 years has cost US high-paying manufacturing jobs. The leaks confirm that the TPP is similar in focus to every previous "free trade" deal. To expect the opposite result from this deal is an article of faith. And insane.
How many times do you need rocks to fall on your head before you decide to stop standing at the bottom of a cliff? "No, this time the rocks will just float in the air!!"
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
123 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Well NAFTA was literally a Republican deal, originated, negotiated and signed by George Bush
Bluenorthwest
May 2015
#3
Why did Clinton "walk through" a republican deal? He sold it to Americans! Myself included.
RiverLover
May 2015
#5
Bill kept NAFTA because he was wrong. Why did the author of this piece leave Bush out of the NAFTA
Bluenorthwest
May 2015
#10
The reason that Bush wasn't mentioned is a distraction from the point of the OP.
rhett o rick
May 2015
#69
+1! Warren gave good ex of this, a French company that sued Egypt because Egypt raised its minimum
RiverLover
May 2015
#97
Well, you kind of miss one important point -- the state can sue the corporation in their own courts.
Hoyt
May 2015
#112
Can you point to one case where the corporation won on raising minimum wage, anti-smoking campaigns?
Hoyt
May 2015
#114
Definitely Poppy's brain child. On the other hand Bubba did a lot more than merely walk it through.
merrily
May 2015
#30
I'll bet many of us mocked Ross Perot and his "giant sucking sound," though. J/S.
WinkyDink
May 2015
#4
Not me. I didn't vote for Perot, but whatever else you may have thought of him,
maddiemom
May 2015
#6
Same, I knew these bastards were waiting like a spider in a web to ship high-paying jobs elsewhere.
BlueJazz
May 2015
#19
No regrets for me at all voting for Perot. He was far from ideal I understand that also.
Person 2713
May 2015
#31
Right? He came across as a dweeb, really a shame. The message got lost in the messenger. nt
RiverLover
May 2015
#12
My Favorite Wingnut uses that phrase all the time in attacking Clinton.
Jackpine Radical
May 2015
#35
Its getting old. Really old. We're the perpetual Bad News Bears, always losing to corporations
RiverLover
May 2015
#15
Healthcare reform failed every previous time (for the last 50 years), too ...
1StrongBlackMan
May 2015
#43
Failing to pass proposals and actually passing failures is a nonsensical comparison
TheKentuckian
May 2015
#76
I love it when advocates of single payer attack ACA as "just insurance reform"...
Recursion
May 2015
#106
Apparently you don't, since you mentioned Europe. I don't think any European country
Recursion
May 2015
#110
No, every country we trade with does not get onto status. It's what used to be called most favored
hedda_foil
May 2015
#92
So without NAFTA, "they" would have stayed in the US for another "year or two" and then "moved
pampango
May 2015
#75
According the CEO types in this country Americans don't WANT manufacturing jobs....
Spitfire of ATJ
May 2015
#38
Raise your hand if you think this makes her extremely vulnerable in the general
BrotherIvan
May 2015
#57
Every president must leave office, but not before setting in motion the means to fuck over
whereisjustice
May 2015
#85