Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)The ERA was Re-introduced in the Senate for Ratification Yesterday [View all]
The ERA was Re-introduced in the Senate for Ratification Yesterday

Just in time for Mothers Day, U.S. Senator Ben Cardin (D-Md.) re-introduced yesterday a joint resolution to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) to the U.S Constitution. S.J. Res. 15 was introduced with 26 original cosponsors including Senator Mark Kirk (R-Il). The resolution would remove the deadline set by congress for ratification of the ERA. U.S. Representative Jackie Speier is expected to introduce an ERA resolution in the House.
The ERA originally passed congress in 1972. Like every proposed constitution amendment, after it passed by a two-thirds vote of both the House and Senate, the ERA was sent to the states for ratification. Congress, however, had imposed in the preamble of the ERA a seven-year deadline on the ratification process. That deadline was eventually extended to June 30, 1982. Thirty eight states must ratify an amendment before it can become part of the U.S. Constitution. Thirty five states ratified the ERA by the 1982 deadline.
If the deadline is lifted, only three more states would need to ratify the amendment. This is called the three-state strategy. As part of the strategy, ERA activists in unratified states are working to clear a path for the ERA. The Illinois State Senate passed the ERA in 2014 with a strong 39-11 vote, and in February 2015, the Virginia State Senate which never took a floor vote on the ERA during the campaign in the 1970s and 1980s voted to pass the ERA for the fourth time since 2011.
As America prepares to celebrate Mothers Day, we should be working to ensure that all women realize the promise of equal protection under the law. We cannot allow an arbitrary deadline to stand in the way of equal rights for our mothers and daughters, wives and sisters, aunts and grandmothers, said Senator Cardin.
The ERA states: Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.
. . . .
http://feminist.org/blog/index.php/2015/05/08/the-era-was-re-introduced-in-the-senate-for-ratification-yesterday/
38 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
yes, it is. in this 'greatest, bestest, most wonderful country in the world", women still
niyad
May 2015
#3
I remember the bathroom argument. It's as if they didn't know we had unisex toilets
CTyankee
May 2015
#26
well, that was exactly what was meant, "all white, property-owning males are created equal"
niyad
May 2015
#6
I am surprised this current congress hasn't tried to repeal the 19th amendment
etherealtruth
May 2015
#5
Yes, they have. The GOP and Constitutionalist parties have both pushed this for decades.
freshwest
May 2015
#19
TIME IS NOT ON OUR SIDE. It's why I ignore more online. The real game is in the statehouses.
freshwest
May 2015
#31
That woman has been a thorn in our side for decades. Maybe she's one of the undead?
calimary
May 2015
#14
Exactly. Why do these people want to take all the advantages for themselves and then
calimary
May 2015
#22
It passed Congress in 1972. They can't do it alone. The states defeated the ERA:
freshwest
May 2015
#25
Somebody should ask Jeb Bush why he opposed ratifying the ERA as FL governor in 2003.
seafan
May 2015
#18
The linked article is confusing on that score. There are two different approaches.
Jim Lane
May 2015
#23