Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
19. Yes, they have. The GOP and Constitutionalist parties have both pushed this for decades.
Sat May 9, 2015, 11:02 PM
May 2015

Last edited Sat May 9, 2015, 11:49 PM - Edit history (1)

They are angling for an Article V Convention to rewrite the United States Constitution, from the state houses. They are keeping count and making sure the legislators will march in lockstep. That is why they elect anyone, no matter how outrageous who will vote their will. They are very close to that majority, if they do not already have it, to call for it.

We can rest assured with a GOP POTUS it will happen. With an Article V concvention, the great tool box to make the Constitution fit the Koch agenda will be opened and the government will rewritten to set up their system. Check ALEC or Reid and Sander's revelations that I have posted here to see what they intend. They have nearly fulfilled it now.

It is all legal. I don't know if the ERA will be ratified in time to stop them, no more than an amendment to overturn Citizens United. Obama said immediately after CU that a grassroots movement would be required to do this and he was talking about from the statehouses. It was the state houses that denied us the ERA before. In the meantime, the media did its job and people did not vote, enabling more of the Koch agenda to be enacted.

They want Birthright Citizenship, Due Process and Equal Treatment Under the Law, all part of the 14th repealed. Rand Paul wants the convention to rewrite the 14th to declare who is a person under the Constitution will be and we know Rand Paul (R- national personhood bill) intends to take that back to conception. Or since the GOP doesn't know when that occurs, at ejacultion. Women = Concubines.

The 4th did not protect women any more than it did Dred Scott, so the 14th and other Civil War amendments had to be passed. People who think they are voting against 'anchor babies' are really putting their own liberty and rights of citizenship at risk, but they don't think about what they are really supporting. Imagine a GOP trifeca and endless war. Many of the GOP envision a Starship Trooper form of citizenship, where only those who serve in the military will have the right to vote. The rest are just their servants and have no voice.

And like the Koch brothers and Grover Nordquist, Libertarians and Truthers, they want the IRS gone. To make sure those pesky laws never show their faces again.

Who can forget Ann Coulter and since then other women's remarks that women should not be voting?

Like LGBT, women are suspect, they are 'the wrong sex.'

We need the ERA more than ever. It would make all the restrictive laws lose their powers, but we must get control of the state houses to make it happen. The Senate can introduce this but it cannot makes it laws, as it is merely a proposal to the states, AFAIK.

And who controls the states? The ones who showed up in 2010 and 2014 to vote. What a nightmare.

K&R... awoke_in_2003 May 2015 #1
It's shameful that this didn't happen decades ago. n/t winter is coming May 2015 #2
yes, it is. in this 'greatest, bestest, most wonderful country in the world", women still niyad May 2015 #3
I worked on that campaign.... Spitfire of ATJ May 2015 #11
I remember the bathroom argument. It's as if they didn't know we had unisex toilets CTyankee May 2015 #26
It's pathetic we even need an ERA Novara May 2015 #4
well, that was exactly what was meant, "all white, property-owning males are created equal" niyad May 2015 #6
I am surprised this current congress hasn't tried to repeal the 19th amendment etherealtruth May 2015 #5
actually, there have been proposals for that very thing. niyad May 2015 #7
Yes, they have. The GOP and Constitutionalist parties have both pushed this for decades. freshwest May 2015 #19
jeeezus... BlancheSplanchnik May 2015 #29
TIME IS NOT ON OUR SIDE. It's why I ignore more online. The real game is in the statehouses. freshwest May 2015 #31
k&r beam me up scottie May 2015 #8
wont have that jackass henry hyde messing w the vote in il this time. mopinko May 2015 #9
I still hate his rotting putrid corpse...... lastlib May 2015 #15
well, that. mopinko May 2015 #16
Fill the visitor galleries of these states with women. Spitfire of ATJ May 2015 #10
The ERA will never be passed I'm afraid... Archae May 2015 #12
That woman has been a thorn in our side for decades. Maybe she's one of the undead? calimary May 2015 #14
Of course. Archae May 2015 #21
Exactly. Why do these people want to take all the advantages for themselves and then calimary May 2015 #22
Yet another reason why we must retake Congress. okasha May 2015 #13
It passed Congress in 1972. They can't do it alone. The states defeated the ERA: freshwest May 2015 #25
K&R Terra Alta May 2015 #17
Somebody should ask Jeb Bush why he opposed ratifying the ERA as FL governor in 2003. seafan May 2015 #18
Would it even be valid? davidn3600 May 2015 #20
The linked article is confusing on that score. There are two different approaches. Jim Lane May 2015 #23
Is there a list of the states that have ratified it! n/t patricia92243 May 2015 #24
Ratifications 1972–1977 progressoid May 2015 #28
How can they extend the deadline without going back in time to before 1982? Reter May 2015 #27
Just like BumRushDaShow May 2015 #30
Key words "about to expire" Reter May 2015 #35
You didn't read the link BumRushDaShow May 2015 #37
Let the brassiere bonfire begin... AngryAmish May 2015 #32
Lets assume this amendment jamzrockz May 2015 #33
R#76 & K nt UTUSN May 2015 #34
Great. Now we can have a second go at being told we aren't equal. n/t Ms. Toad May 2015 #36
. . . . niyad May 2015 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The ERA was Re-introduced...»Reply #19