Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Regardless of whether Al Gore or Ralph Nader was to blame for "losing" the 2000 election... [View all]nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)98. Nope no admission there
A historical fact. Third parties have existed since parties started in the late 1700's. Due to the system in theConstitution two dominate. Sometimes third parties take over other major parties. Sometimes they become such a pain in the ass their ideology is absorbed by a major party.
But they exist. Your inability to comprehend this and keep going but Nader is yours alone. And it is the same shit, different year that happens in 2008 when that other fella got into the race. This is purely about Sanders and your anxiety. Same shit was tried last time with that other fella.
If nothing else this silly season is following the sane exact pattern.
So please proceed with this silliness
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
105 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Regardless of whether Al Gore or Ralph Nader was to blame for "losing" the 2000 election... [View all]
YoungDemCA
May 2015
OP
Sorry. No Nader, no Bush. despite any of the other factors. I don't defend BFEE,
HERVEPA
May 2015
#2
Here's the exit poll results from a Harvard Political Science professor for a paper
DemocratSinceBirth
May 2015
#81
It's a peer reviewed paper for the American Political Science Association
DemocratSinceBirth
May 2015
#84
It is in fact incredibly relevant, because it answers the question. The answer is "no."
Scootaloo
May 2015
#10
because this was a brand-new sentiment that Nader introduced to American politics?
Scootaloo
May 2015
#26
But 'the parties are the same" is not a remotely new sentiment in US politics
Scootaloo
May 2015
#33
(Nader) haters gonna hate. What can you do? (Although you are exhibiting the
KingCharlemagne
May 2015
#27
I've often wondered why defecting to the Republicans rarely rates a mention,
winter is coming
May 2015
#20
Presumably, the Dems who voted for Nader wanted something different, too,
winter is coming
May 2015
#41
Nader took 20,000 votes from Gore in Florida which made the results close enough for
world wide wally
May 2015
#13
Thank you. Yet some people seem unable to digest this simple fact. No Nader, no Bush
HERVEPA
May 2015
#15
That is simplistic thinking. We have no way of knowing what else bush was willing to do to steal it.
morningfog
May 2015
#55
Couldn't anyone have checked the ballots in Florida and made a fuss about the butterfly ballot?
Chathamization
May 2015
#19
And when the election came down to whom you'd prefer to have a beer with, why
KingCharlemagne
May 2015
#45
Yes, Ralph Nader is an enemy of democracy and did everything he could to split the vote
The Second Stone
May 2015
#42
There were so many Republican shenanigans going on in Florida at the time,
Art_from_Ark
May 2015
#58
And if Nader hadn't also spoiled New Hampshire, Florida's electoral votes could have
The Second Stone
May 2015
#78
Yes, I remember it well, and with the dirty tricks that we see in most elections
The Second Stone
May 2015
#67
Ross Perot absolutely ran to spoil the race of GHW Bush and throw it to Clinton
The Second Stone
May 2015
#73
Those are the biggest enemies of American democracy that we have ever seen
world wide wally
May 2015
#96