Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

progressoid

(50,425 posts)
28. Ratifications 1972–1977
Sun May 10, 2015, 04:38 PM
May 2015

Hawaii (March 22, 1972)
New Hampshire (March 23, 1972)
Delaware (March 23, 1972)
Iowa (March 24, 1972)
Idaho (March 24, 1972)
Kansas (March 28, 1972)
Nebraska (March 29, 1972)
Texas (March 30, 1972)
Tennessee (April 4, 1972)
Alaska (April 5, 1972)
Rhode Island (April 14, 1972)
New Jersey (April 17, 1972)
Colorado (April 21, 1972)
West Virginia (April 22, 1972)
Wisconsin (April 26, 1972)
New York (May 18, 1972)
Michigan (May 22, 1972)
Maryland (May 26, 1972)
Massachusetts (June 21, 1972)
Kentucky (June 26, 1972)
Pennsylvania (September 27, 1972)
California (November 13, 1972)
Wyoming (January 26, 1973)
South Dakota (February 5, 1973)
Oregon (February 8, 1973)
Minnesota (February 8, 1973)
New Mexico (February 28, 1973)
Vermont (March 1, 1973)
Connecticut (March 15, 1973)
Washington (March 22, 1973)
Maine (January 18, 1974)
Montana (January 25, 1974)
Ohio (February 7, 1974)
North Dakota (March 19, 1975)
Indiana (January 24, 1977)

Ratifications rescinded 1973–1979

Legislators in the following states voted to rescind their earlier ratification of the ERA:[21]

Nebraska (March 15, 1973 – Legislative Resolution No. 9)
In 1972, the Nebraska Legislature adopted the improperly-worded Legislative Resolution No. 83 followed by correctly-worded Legislative Resolution No. 86, to ratify ERA. In 1973, the Nebraska Legislature then adopted Legislative Resolution No. 9 to rescind only the aforementioned improperly-worded LR No. 83. This may mean that Nebraska—technically—did not rescind its 1972 ERA ratification.[22]
Tennessee (April 23, 1974 – House Joint Resolution No. 371 and Senate Joint Resolution No. 29)[22]
Idaho (February 8, 1977 – Senate Joint Resolution No. 133 and House Concurrent Resolution No. 10)
Kentucky (March 17, 1978 – House (Joint) Resolution No. 2 and House (Joint) Resolution No. 20)
The Lieutenant Governor of Kentucky, Thelma Stovall, who was acting as governor in the Governor's absence, vetoed the rescinding resolution.
South Dakota (March 1, 1979 – Senate Joint Resolution No. 1 and Senate Joint Resolution No. 2)
Senate Joint Resolution No. 2, while not going quite so far as to rescind its prior ratification of ERA, stipulated that the ERA's opportunity for ratification—by any state of the Union—would expire on March 22, 1979; furthermore, Senate Joint Resolution No. 2 made clear that South Dakota's own ratification of the ERA would only be valid up until March 22, 1979, and that any ratification activities transpiring after that date anywhere else would be considered by South Dakota to be null and void.


The Constitution is silent regarding whether the governor of a state has any authority regarding whether that state ratifies an amendment to the Constitution. The Constitution is likewise silent regarding a state's authority to rescind its ratification of a proposed, but not yet adopted, constitutional amendment.[23]

Incomplete ratifications

At various times, in 9 of the 15 non-ratifying states, at least one house of the legislature approved the ERA, those 9 states being:

Florida – whose House of Representatives voted to ratify the ERA on March 24, 1972, with a tally of 91 to 4; a second time on April 10, 1975, with a tally of 62 to 58; a third time on May 17, 1979, with a tally of 66 to 53; and a fourth time on June 21, 1982, with a tally of 60 to 58.
Illinois – whose Senate voted to ratify the ERA in May 1972, with a tally of 30 to 21; and whose House of Representatives voted to ratify the ERA on May 1, 1975, with a tally of 113 to 62; and again on May 21, 2003, with a tally of 76 to 41 (House Joint Resolution Constitutional Amendment No. 1). At various times, votes were conducted in both houses of the Illinois General Assembly on the question of ratifying the ERA and while most members voted in favor of ratification, the result was always less than the requirement of a three-fifths supermajority vote in each house of the Illinois General Assembly being required for ratification by that state.
Louisiana – whose Senate voted to ratify the ERA on June 7, 1972, with a tally of 25 to 13.
Missouri – whose House of Representatives voted to ratify the ERA on February 7, 1975, with a tally of 82 to 75.
Nevada – whose Assembly voted to ratify the ERA on February 17, 1975, with a tally of 27 to 13; and whose Senate voted to ratify the ERA on February 8, 1977, with a tally of 11 to 10.
North Carolina – whose House of Representatives voted to ratify the ERA on February 9, 1977, with a tally of 61 to 55.
Oklahoma – whose Senate voted to ratify the ERA on March 23, 1972, by a voice vote.
South Carolina – whose House of Representatives voted to ratify the ERA on March 22, 1972, with a tally of 83 to zero.
Virginia – whose Senate voted to ratify the ERA on February 7, 2011, with a tally of 24 to 16 (Senate Joint Resolution No. 357); a second time on February 14, 2012, with a tally of 24 to 15 (Senate Joint Resolution No. 130); a third time on February 5, 2014, with a tally of 25 to 8 (Senate Joint Resolution No. 78); and a fourth time on February 5, 2015, with a tally of 20 to 19 (Senate Joint Resolution No. 216).

Over the past twenty years, ratification resolutions have also been introduced, but failed to win full approval in Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Illinois, Mississippi, Missouri, and Oklahoma.[24][25]
K&R... awoke_in_2003 May 2015 #1
It's shameful that this didn't happen decades ago. n/t winter is coming May 2015 #2
yes, it is. in this 'greatest, bestest, most wonderful country in the world", women still niyad May 2015 #3
I worked on that campaign.... Spitfire of ATJ May 2015 #11
I remember the bathroom argument. It's as if they didn't know we had unisex toilets CTyankee May 2015 #26
It's pathetic we even need an ERA Novara May 2015 #4
well, that was exactly what was meant, "all white, property-owning males are created equal" niyad May 2015 #6
I am surprised this current congress hasn't tried to repeal the 19th amendment etherealtruth May 2015 #5
actually, there have been proposals for that very thing. niyad May 2015 #7
Yes, they have. The GOP and Constitutionalist parties have both pushed this for decades. freshwest May 2015 #19
jeeezus... BlancheSplanchnik May 2015 #29
TIME IS NOT ON OUR SIDE. It's why I ignore more online. The real game is in the statehouses. freshwest May 2015 #31
k&r beam me up scottie May 2015 #8
wont have that jackass henry hyde messing w the vote in il this time. mopinko May 2015 #9
I still hate his rotting putrid corpse...... lastlib May 2015 #15
well, that. mopinko May 2015 #16
Fill the visitor galleries of these states with women. Spitfire of ATJ May 2015 #10
The ERA will never be passed I'm afraid... Archae May 2015 #12
That woman has been a thorn in our side for decades. Maybe she's one of the undead? calimary May 2015 #14
Of course. Archae May 2015 #21
Exactly. Why do these people want to take all the advantages for themselves and then calimary May 2015 #22
Yet another reason why we must retake Congress. okasha May 2015 #13
It passed Congress in 1972. They can't do it alone. The states defeated the ERA: freshwest May 2015 #25
K&R Terra Alta May 2015 #17
Somebody should ask Jeb Bush why he opposed ratifying the ERA as FL governor in 2003. seafan May 2015 #18
Would it even be valid? davidn3600 May 2015 #20
The linked article is confusing on that score. There are two different approaches. Jim Lane May 2015 #23
Is there a list of the states that have ratified it! n/t patricia92243 May 2015 #24
Ratifications 1972–1977 progressoid May 2015 #28
How can they extend the deadline without going back in time to before 1982? Reter May 2015 #27
Just like BumRushDaShow May 2015 #30
Key words "about to expire" Reter May 2015 #35
You didn't read the link BumRushDaShow May 2015 #37
Let the brassiere bonfire begin... AngryAmish May 2015 #32
Lets assume this amendment jamzrockz May 2015 #33
R#76 & K nt UTUSN May 2015 #34
Great. Now we can have a second go at being told we aren't equal. n/t Ms. Toad May 2015 #36
. . . . niyad May 2015 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The ERA was Re-introduced...»Reply #28